WEATHER DOT COM Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 Just now, westside2 said: Go pound some yen CCP traitor. You're worse than BillZtime 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 1 hour ago, Doc said: This is patently false. Russian collusion is still believed by the entirety of the left despite 4 years of failure to prove a single thing. That's the definition of refusing to accept the results of an election. And impeachment happened because they had a majority in the House and wanted desperately to get him on something. Not unlike Clinton with lying about a BJ, although at least there Clinton perjured himself. As for trying to unilaterally jail people...who has been jailed? No. The definition of refusing to accept an election result would be to dispute it by legal means, as Trump has said he may do if he loses.. Trying to unilaterally jail people isn't the same as someone being jailed. Do you really not understand the difference? 6 minutes ago, westside2 said: Go pound some yen CCP traitor. You must be an attorney with those oratory skills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 21 hours ago, Unforgiven said: What world do you live in? Bernie isn't running ergo scratch Socialism No Guns? Hardly. It's Heep Guns out of the hands of unstable people (Don's followers) Worship the Government? What about Worshiping Donald Fat Assed Trump? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teddy KGB Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 6 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: What world do you live in? Bernie isn't running ergo scratch Socialism No Guns? Hardly. It's Heep Guns out of the hands of unstable people (Don's followers) Worship the Government? What about Worshiping Donald Fat Assed Trump? Lmao. Why does Don’s figure bring you to tears? How is a 60 year old man this dumb ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 50 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said: How is a 60 year old man this dumb ? Practice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 1 hour ago, Kemp said: No. The definition of refusing to accept an election result would be to dispute it by legal means, as Trump has said he may do if he loses.. Trying to unilaterally jail people isn't the same as someone being jailed. Do you really not understand the difference? You must be an attorney with those oratory skills. You must be a traitor to the United States with those commie views. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 (edited) 53 minutes ago, westside2 said: You must be a traitor to the United States with those commie views. Commie views? Are you pretending to be an idiot? Are you really this simple? I'm beginning to believe that Westside is a composite of stereotypes someone invented. Is he a cartoon character? Edited October 21, 2020 by Kemp 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plano Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 On 10/18/2020 at 9:13 AM, All_Pro_Bills said: When you can't refute fact use the old go-to move here? 1000% BS on the Russia story here. Aren't we bored with this narrative yet which has zero, absolutely zero proof or facts to drive it? The facts show the source e-mails and data are legitimate. BIDEN TOTALLY BUSTED. GAME OVER! you honestly think people give a *****? Hunter Biden isn't running for president. /thread /trump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 17 minutes ago, Plano said: you honestly think people give a *****? Hunter Biden isn't running for president. /thread /trump Of course people care, at least some people do. The only question is whether or not it swings voters into one column or another. You may not care about it, business as usual in Washington, but I’m thinking you were unTrumpian to begin with. I care, but my vote was decided long ago with some wiggle room in case something that bothered me came up. It’s not us that matter, really. It’ll be must see TV to see how Trump approaches Biden about Hunter at the debate, how Biden handles it and we go from there. It’s sad imo, but that’s the way the game is played. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 Trump’s own business history is filled with overseas financial deals, and some have involved the Chinese state. He spent a decade unsuccessfully pursuing projects in China, operating an office there during his first run for president and forging a partnership with a major government-controlled company. And it turns out that China is one of only three foreign nations — the others are Britain and Ireland — where Trump maintains a bank account, according to an analysis of the president’s tax records, which were obtained by The New York Times. The foreign accounts do not show up on Trump’s public financial disclosures, where he must list personal assets, because they are held under corporate names. The identities of the financial institutions are not clear. The Chinese account is controlled by Trump International Hotels Management LLC, which the tax records show paid $188,561 in taxes in China while pursuing licensing deals there from 2013 to 2015. https://news.yahoo.com/trump-records-shed-light-chinese-120755338.html TeddyTrump insinuated I’m dumb huh? the same clown that can’t define Antifia after a year of being asked what it means? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 17 hours ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said: No doubt about it Three of the attorneys that represented Trump during his impeachment were attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, Kemp said: No. The definition of refusing to accept an election result would be to dispute it by legal means, as Trump has said he may do if he loses.. Trying to unilaterally jail people isn't the same as someone being jailed. Do you really not understand the difference? Tell me about Bush v. Gore... You can't unilaterally jail people in this country. And no, it hasn't happened and won't happen under Trump. Edited October 21, 2020 by Doc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER DOT COM Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 1 minute ago, Kemp said: Three of the attorneys that represented Trump during his impeachment were attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein. One of the attorneys that represented Trump during his impeachment is accused of raping a 17 yeard old acquantaince of Epstein's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 17 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Of course people care, at least some people do. The only question is whether or not it swings voters into one column or another. You may not care about it, business as usual in Washington, but I’m thinking you were unTrumpian to begin with. I care, but my vote was decided long ago with some wiggle room in case something that bothered me came up. It’s not us that matter, really. It’ll be must see TV to see how Trump approaches Biden about Hunter at the debate, how Biden handles it and we go from there. It’s sad imo, but that’s the way the game is played. Going after Hunter will be an awful move. If it's being brought up it needs to be kept to Joe's direct actions and involvement. Anything beyond that will not play well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 4 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: Going after Hunter will be an awful move. If it's being brought up it needs to be kept to Joe's direct actions and involvement. Anything beyond that will not play well. Who is bringing that up? The people that cried foul over Don Jr's meeting with a Russian lawyer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 9 minutes ago, Doc said: Who is bringing that up? The people that cried foul over Don Jr's meeting with a Russian lawyer? I'm pretty sure it was one of the things that played the worst across the board for him in the first debate. At least in the post-debate feedback I consumed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 27 minutes ago, Doc said: Tell me about Bush v. Gore... You can't unilaterally jail people in this country. And no, it hasn't happened and won't happen under Trump. Because Barr is blocking Trump's attempts. True or not true? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 43 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: Going after Hunter will be an awful move. If it's being brought up it needs to be kept to Joe's direct actions and involvement. Anything beyond that will not play well. I disagree, though I would not have a few years ago. The Hunter story is about graft, corruption and pay for play. The fact that the guy has addiction issues, stripper issues and sleep with his dead brother’s wife issues are one thing, and should be left off the table..except... Hunter getting a cushy job, his father shaking down the Ukrainians and bragging about it like he’s Boss Tweed, combined with all the rest hits right to the point many disenchanted voters feel that Washington is all about—patronage and backwater deals. The game is played the way it’s played. Kavanaugh a serial rapist. Romney a serial chauvinist. Trump every version of a -phobe there is. Don Trump Jr part of the Russian collision tale. Ivanka is a feckless ...... You have your shot, take it. I agree you make it about Joe by talking about Hunter, but that’s the way it goes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 36 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: I'm pretty sure it was one of the things that played the worst across the board for him in the first debate. At least in the post-debate feedback I consumed Maybe then, but things have changed now. 28 minutes ago, Kemp said: Because Barr is blocking Trump's attempts. True or not true? He is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 27 minutes ago, Doc said: Maybe then, but things have changed now. He is? Trump has asked him to go after Biden. You've heard him say it. Barr doesn't seem anxious to do what Trump is asking of him. Is this news to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts