Jump to content

This is sickening


Recommended Posts

Nancy Pelosi and Democrats have it exactly wrong on feds vs. protesters in Portland

by Rich Lowry

 

Original Article

 

If only mobs were allowed to destroy federal property without consequence. Then, there wouldn’t have to be any dispute over federal agents defending a federal courthouse in Portland, Ore.; it could simply be over-run and burned to the ground with no unwelcome resistance from the government.

 

As it is, Portland’s mayor, Ted Wheeler, who presides over a city that has become a watchword over the years for left-wing thuggery unchecked by municipal authorities, has roused himself to a state of high dudgeon — over federal officers trying to counter ongoing assaults on a federal building.

 

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LB3 said:

@Teddy KGB Can you come bring the puppy back to the sandbox? He's shitting all over the place here and we just got a new rug. It really ties the room together.


I can’t help you.    He blocks me every other week as he melts down whenever someone doesn’t “like” his 18 straight copy pasted anti trump shouts on a football website ?

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:

https://www.newsweek.com/republican-rand-paul-breaks-trump-over-portland-cannot-give-liberty-security-1519204

 

Republican Rand Paul Breaks With Trump Over Portland: 'Cannot Give Up Liberty for Security'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I agree with this.  See how easy that is to disagree with Donald Trump?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These democrat voters unfortunately need to learn a hard lesson.  When you vote for Communists, you get life under Communism.  That means hard-handed, authoritarian life for the law abiding while the troops do the dirty work and make life even more miserable.  The blue states and cities that have been blue for generations are learning the hard way what happens when you vote for comrades like De Blasio, et. al.

 

In other words, let these places burn and take care let them rebuild on their own.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

Does protecting a federal courthouse include knocking out a bicyclist?

 

 

 

Read your own post.

 

 

That was Portland Police.

 

And you don't have ANY idea why they were after him.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

Does protecting a federal courthouse include knocking out a bicyclist?

 

 

 

Got him!  That was good heads up form tacking.

 

Maybe this could be the filler sport we need until the NFL can get back on it's feet.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bilzfancy said:

So you are against law and order, which means you are an anarchist

 

I am against cops taking out a bicyclist like Terry Tate, yes. If the bicyclist is guilty of a crime, there are other ways to apprehend the suspect.

 

What law did the bicyclist break that required that excessive use of force?

Edited by wAcKy ZeBrA
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

Does protecting a federal courthouse include knocking out a bicyclist?

 

 

Longer clip. Where they're announcing people will be arrested by force if they are there. Totally justified. Especially for this guy riding back and forth looking for trouble.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

INDEED: Portland’s Pottery Barn Rule: If a mayor won’t stop violence in his city, why should Trump let him off the hook?

Exhibit A is Portland, Ore. Like many American cities, Portland has been consumed by protests. This is an overwhelmingly white city—African-Americans make up less than 6% of the population—run by a progressive white mayor, Ted Wheeler. In the Portland context he may be the moderate: his rival in the coming election is a woman who has said, “I am Antifa.” . . .

 

It’s not lack of resources that keeps such mayors from maintaining order. It’s lack of will. As South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott pointed out after Democrats sank his crime bill, the communities suffering most from the urban unrest “have been run by Democrats for decades. Decades.”

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:

Kissing Don's ass every day as he abuses his power and breaks the law.   

 

It is shameful actually 


The Insurrection Act of 1807 give the President the authority to activate the National Guard or US military domestically under prescribed circumstances.

 

Initially, the law required the request of the states governor to put down an insurrection against state or federal law, however After the Civil War the law was amended to grant the Federal Government unilateral authority to act, assuming that the state is refusing to protect the Constitutionally protected rights of its citizens.


There are miles of precedent for the President’s application of the law, including in 1957 when Eisenhower used it to integrate Arkansas schools Against the wishes of the Governor.

 

The President isn’t doing anything illegal.

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dubs said:

 

I agree with this.  See how easy that is to disagree with Donald Trump?

 

 

 

Except he's wrong.  Federal property means federal jurisdiction means federal police.  Kind of like how FPS protects the social security admin building in my city instead of the city PD and Capitol Police protects Congress instead of Metro PD.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, LB3 said:

Longer clip. Where they're announcing people will be arrested by force if they are there. Totally justified. Especially for this guy riding back and forth looking for trouble.

 

Let's guess which clip gets run a hundred time by the MSM today???

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...