Jump to content

Slithering Towards Dictatorship


Kemp

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said:

I'm still more worried about what will happen if Trump refuses to accept his loss to Hillary in 2016.

Ha! Classic! I’ll never forget that one. Who knew at the time that we’d still be dealing with the delicious irony of that question?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, 32ABBA said:

I thought "the end of America as we know it" was what they wanted? I thought the Good old USA was a terrible, racist, sexist country?

 

 

 

...of course it is.....the world's arrogant bully needs to be taken down a few notches and moved to the middle of the pack.......irrespective of Trump, the IDEA of MAGA is detested.....

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/1/2020 at 9:58 AM, Buffalo Timmy said:

While that standard is ridiculous your rant is over the top. Trump is not a dictator and the reason I voted for him is he has at no point told me to turn over my rights to the govt.

 

Through November 15, the Trump administration had filed 29 eminent domain suits tied to border-wall construction this year, up from 11 each of the past two years, according to federal court records. All but four of this year's suits were filed in Texas. Eminent domain is the right of a government to seize private land for public use, while providing compensation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

Through November 15, the Trump administration had filed 29 eminent domain suits tied to border-wall construction this year, up from 11 each of the past two years, according to federal court records. All but four of this year's suits were filed in Texas. Eminent domain is the right of a government to seize private land for public use, while providing compensation.

Good....I can't think of a better use of eminent domain than border security. Also, Mexican cartels have bought a good deal of border property. So the chance is good that they are forcing the cartels to sell it back. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sabrecrazed said:

Good....I can't think of a better use of eminent domain than border security. Also, Mexican cartels have bought a good deal of border property. So the chance is good that they are forcing the cartels to sell it back. 

 

Another poster said Trump had not taken anything away from private citizens.

So, the government can steal your property if they think it's a good thing. Yeah, I'm sure you would be fine with that if it was your property.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Kemp said:

Through November 15, the Trump administration had filed 29 eminent domain suits tied to border-wall construction this year, up from 11 each of the past two years, according to federal court records. All but four of this year's suits were filed in Texas. Eminent domain is the right of a government to seize private land for public use, while providing compensation.


You are soooo bad at this. ?

 

plagiarized.jpg

Edited by Golden Goat
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

Another poster said Trump had not taken anything away from private citizens.

So, the government can steal your property if they think it's a good thing. Yeah, I'm sure you would be fine with that if it was your property.


So you think eminent domain is a new power seized by trump? 
 

I agree that it should only be used in extreme circumstance, but that’s a different discussion. If you’re asserting that this is something new under trump and evidence of some move to dictatorship, you’re WAY misinformed. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

Yes, I should post things from people I never heard of on Twitter, instead of factual information.

 

Care to comment on the actual authoritarian/dictatorial overreach? Or nah? 

 

22 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Funny how Kemp doesn't want to talk about the actual authoritarian overreach committed by the government... 

 

 

Page 82: NSA examined all queries using identifiers for "U.S. persons targeted pursuant to Sections 704 and 705(b) of FISA using the [REDACTED / X-Keyscore] tool in [REDACTED] ... from November 1, 2015 to May 1, 2016." Id. at 2-3 (footnote omitted). Based on that examination, "NSA estimates that approximately eighty-five percent of those queries, representing [REDACTED] queires conducted by approximately [REDACTED] targeted offices, were not compliant with the applicable minimization procedures." Id. at 3. Many of these non-compliant queries involved use of the same identifiers over different date ranges. Id. Even so, a non-compliance rate of 85% raises substantial questions about the propriety of using of [REDACTED / X-KEYSCORE] to query FISA data. While the government reports that it is unable to provide a reliable estimate of the number of non-compliant queries since 2012, id., there is no apparent reason to believe the November 2015-April 2016 period coincided with an unusually high error rate.

 

(Emphasis my own)

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf

 

 

Horowitz reportedly finds FBI lawyer falsified FISA doc

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/horowitz-finds-evidence-fbi-employee-altered-russia-probe-document

 

 

 

FISA court slams FBI conduct in Carter Page surveillance warrant applications

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/17/politics/fisa-court-slams-fbi-conduct/index.html

 

 

DOJ Determines 2 FISA Spy Warrants on Trump Campaign Adviser Were “Not Valid”

https://themarketswork.com/2020/01/23/doj-determines-2-fisa-spy-warrants-on-trump-campaign-adviser-were-not-valid/

 

Comparing the allegations about Trump and the Ukraine to the proven crimes committed above is not something Kemp wishes to do. Because he knows one is far more dangerous of a slide towards a dictatorship than the other. And, because Kemp is a fool, he's upset about the wrong one. 

 

NPCs say the darndest things. 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the 2020 elections go against Trump and he claims that the election was rigged and refuses to accept the results, will you support him in his actions?

I understand that it falls into the unlikely category, but replying with a non-answer would be saying you would back him. 

The only answer that does not endorse a dictatorship would be to reject his assertion and agree that he must leave.

3 minutes ago, Golden Goat said:

 

How about using your brain and writing your own ****? Is it really that difficult?

 

I don't recall you posting something similar when DR posts literally thousands of other people's tweets.

By the way, it's still true, even if it is copy and pasted.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kemp said:

If the 2020 elections go against Trump and he claims that the election was rigged and refuses to accept the results, will you support him in his actions?

 

:lol: Like you did in 2016 you mean? Or the DNC? Or the media? 

 

Comments like this just show how stupid of a person you actually are. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kemp said:

If the 2020 elections go against Trump and he claims that the election was rigged and refuses to accept the results, will you support him in his actions?

I understand that it falls into the unlikely category, but replying with a non-answer would be saying you would back him. 

The only answer that does not endorse a dictatorship would be to reject his assertion and agree that he must leave. ...

 

 

i'm sorry but... have the Democrats actually accepted that they lost the '16 election yet?

 

:lol:

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...