Kemp Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: Q: If your esteem of the posters here is -SO- low, why are you here? A: Because you're a piece of garbage and a troll. Again, you can insult me, but you can't dispute all of Trump’s lies about the virus. Try. Nah. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/04/trumps-lies-about-coronavirus/608647/ Edited May 5, 2020 by Kemp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Just now, SectionC3 said: Fake logic. There is more than one possible conclusion. And, you should thank me. I just found a potential miracle cure for COVID-19. We could be on the vanguard of an incredible approach here. Answer the question. Just now, Kemp said: Again, you can insult me, but you can't dispute all of Trump’s lies about the virus. Try. Nah. Answer the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, Kemp said: Facts always disagree with the lies Trump tells. You can insult me, but you can't argue with truth. Well, you can, but it will only prove you're lying and not very bright. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/04/trumps-lies-about-coronavirus/608647/ The cult won’t even click the link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Just now, Joe in Winslow said: Answer the question. Which one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Just now, Q-baby! said: The cult won’t even click the link. Do they know how? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Just now, Q-baby! said: The cult won’t even click the link. Probably too busy racing to Home Depot or Lowe's (with their gun t-shirts and without their masks, if they're anything like the people at the OP Lowe's) to get Roundup after I announced my miracle cure. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Just now, SectionC3 said: Which one? My word, bless your dense little heart. If your esteem of posters here is SO low, why are you here? Surely someone of your esteemed intellect could spend his or her time among their "peers." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reality Check Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 7 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Actually I think the people in Corona might have been on to my miracle cure before I discovered it. Yesterday I was doing a little weeding and I realized that, although not a lot of people know this, Roundup knocks out weeds in minutes. So, I thought, why not try it on COVID-19? I figure that since Roundup does a tremendous number on weeds, surely it would be interesting to check its efficacy with respect to COVID-19. Bottom line: whacking the virus with a little Roundup could be our path to victory over this invisible enemy. If there is a way to do something like that by injection inside, then we could be days away from getting out of this mess. Name calling is a sign of defeat. Do you actually use Round-Up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Not sure what you're talking about with respect to the "esteem of posters." Are you talking about my views of one poster? Two posters? Or a larger group of posters? I can't answer the question without additional information. That aside, I'm here largely for entertainment. And, at least this morning, to inform the world of my potential Covid Cure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan1959 Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Just now, SectionC3 said: How much is "much"? 10%? 25%? 50%? Or more? Does the weight of the data (e.g., more than 50%) support your position? I am not in a position of making policy and only offering my opinion. I am advocating reopening based on the data I have read. I would think it obvious in that statement that I feel there is enough data out there now for me to feel comfortable in my stance. So, tell me, how certain do you need to be about the data before you reopen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: Answer the question. Answer the question. I drop by once in a while to marvel at the stupidity and the inability of you to dispute Trump’s lies, in this case about the virus. Your turn. Deny Trump’s lies about the virus that I posted a link to. You won't. You can't. Prove me wrong or continue to insult, the mark of the weak. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Just now, SectionC3 said: Not sure what you're talking about with respect to the "esteem of posters." Are you talking about my views of one poster? Two posters? Or a larger group of posters? I can't answer the question without additional information. That aside, I'm here largely for entertainment. And, at least this morning, to inform the world of my potential Covid Cure. Scroll up. Read the genius Kemp's post in this thread. "I don't care what you think about me...yakkity blah, edited for bloviation" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, Reality Check said: Do you actually use Round-Up? No. I don't need it, and to my understanding it's pretty bad both for the environment and for people. But also bad for Coronavirus. So, take the good with the bad, I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reality Check Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 4 minutes ago, Kemp said: Again, you can insult me, but you can't dispute all of Trump’s lies about the virus. Try. Nah. You mean the COVID 19 virus that has GP 120 spliced into it? The glycoprotein that makes HIV so infectious? Patented by Fauci? Released from a lab in Wuhan that Fauci does BUSINESS with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Just now, Kemp said: I drop by once in a while to marvel at the stupidity and the inability of you to dispute Trump’s lies, in this case about the virus. Your turn. Deny Trump’s lies about the virus that I posted a link to. You won't. You can't. Prove me wrong or continue to insult, the mark of the weak. Simple. An editorial article posted from the Atlantic - a fully paid for and operative propaganda outlet for the establishment Democratic party - can't be trusted to publish anything remotely truthful or objective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 1 minute ago, Reality Check said: You mean the COVID 19 virus that has GP 120 spliced into it? The glycoprotein that makes HIV so infectious? Patented by Fauci? Released from a lab in Wuhan that Fauci does BUSINESS with? Nutbar alert! ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Just now, billsfan1959 said: I am not in a position of making policy and only offering my opinion. I am advocating reopening based on the data I have read. I would think it obvious in that statement that I feel there is enough data out there now for me to feel comfortable in my stance. So, tell me, how certain do you need to be about the data before you reopen? Let's dig a little deeper here. You said "much" of the data supports reopening. "Much," as you know, is a fungible thing. It could be 10%. It could be 35%. Or it could be more. I'd like the weight of the relevant information to support reopening. It's kind of like the HCL discussion. There is some information that supports its broad use in this context. But the weight of the data does not. Said differently, the approach isn't generally accepted within the relevant scientific community. So I would wait on that front, and would take the same approach on reopening unless and until the relevant scientific community accepts an approach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: Simple. An editorial article posted from the Atlantic - a fully paid for and operative propaganda outlet for the establishment Democratic party - can't be trusted to publish anything remotely truthful or objective. Ha ha!!! So typical. So dishonest! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Just now, Q-baby! said: Ha ha!!! So typical. So dishonest! Look at you, blindly accepting the ***** your masters spoon feed you. Like a good little sheep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Just now, Joe in Winslow said: Simple. An editorial article posted from the Atlantic - a fully paid for and operative propaganda outlet for the establishment Democratic party - can't be trusted to publish anything remotely truthful or objective. Wow! Either you didn't read it or you're simpler than I thought. Is the following an editorial or statement of fact? When: Multiple timesThe claim: The Trump White House “inherited” a “broken,” “bad,” and “obsolete” test for the coronavirus.The truth: The novel coronavirus did not exist in humans during the Obama administration. Public-health experts agree that, because of that fact, the CDC could not have produced a test, and thus a new test had to be developed this year. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reality Check Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, Q-baby! said: Nutbar alert! ? Your fear of the truth warms my heart. Trump 2020. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Just now, Joe in Winslow said: Look at you, blindly accepting the ***** your masters spoon feed you. Like a good little sheep. I watch everything he says live on TV. Is that fake too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan1959 Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 (edited) 9 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Let's dig a little deeper here. You said "much" of the data supports reopening. "Much," as you know, is a fungible thing. It could be 10%. It could be 35%. Or it could be more. I'd like the weight of the relevant information to support reopening. It's kind of like the HCL discussion. There is some information that supports its broad use in this context. But the weight of the data does not. Said differently, the approach isn't generally accepted within the relevant scientific community. So I would wait on that front, and would take the same approach on reopening unless and until the relevant scientific community accepts an approach. So, what is the wieight of the data regarding your position? 10%? 25%? 50%? Or more? Does the weight of the data (e.g., more than 50%) support your position? Edited May 5, 2020 by billsfan1959 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 4 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said: So, what is the wieight of the data? 10%? 25%? 50%? Or more? Does the weight of the data (e.g., more than 50%) support your position? Weight of the data is pretty obvious. I'll leave that alone. On reopening, my general POV is that there probably isn't a one size fits all solution, and that reopening probably will have to be gradual, both in terms of geography and industry. The Cuomo approach seems to be a smart one, and the grouping of linked areas (e.g., tri-state area around NYC) makes a lot of sense. Whether the weight of the data supports that position I can't say - I haven't studied the issue sufficiently to reach such a conclusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 7 minutes ago, Q-baby! said: I watch everything he says live on TV. Is that fake too? You'll pardon me if I don't believe this statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 10 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: Look at you, blindly accepting the ***** your masters spoon feed you. Like a good little sheep. Kind of like OAN viewers. Or is that "non-fake" news? I get so confused trying to figure out which news is regarded as fake and which is real these days. One day the WSJ is real. Then it's fake. One day Fox is real. Then that's fake, too. It's almost as if whether news is real or fake depends on whether such news is good or bad for Trump. 2 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: You'll pardon me if I don't believe this statement. Good work on addressing the statement. Now, the question. Is that fake, too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Just now, SectionC3 said: Good work on addressing the statement. Now, the question. Is that fake, too? It's patently fake that he/she/it/whatever watches the President daily. 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: Kind of like OAN viewers. Or is that "non-fake" news? I get so confused trying to figure out which news is regarded as fake and which is real these days. One day the WSJ is real. Then it's fake. One day Fox is real. Then that's fake, too. It's almost as if whether news is real or fake depends on whether such news is good or bad for Trump. For the record, I don't watch ANY television news outlet. It's all trash. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reality Check Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 19 minutes ago, Kemp said: I drop by once in a while to marvel at the stupidity and the inability of you to dispute Trump’s lies, in this case about the virus. Your turn. Deny Trump’s lies about the virus that I posted a link to. You won't. You can't. Prove me wrong or continue to insult, the mark of the weak. I'd like to commend you on single-handedly keeping the furniture industry afloat these past few months. Hopefully you bought local. Cheers ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: It's patently fake that he/she/it/whatever watches the President daily. For the record, I don't watch ANY television news outlet. It's all trash. Why is it patently fake? If I said I watch the President daily, would you think that's fake, too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Hey Joe. You're still here, so how about an answer? I answered your question. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reality Check Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Just now, SectionC3 said: Why is it patently fake? If I said I watch the President daily, would you think that's fake, too? Yep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 21 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: Simple. An editorial article posted from the Atlantic - a fully paid for and operative propaganda outlet for the establishment Democratic party - can't be trusted to publish anything remotely truthful or objective. I loved the author's article from early March where they opined that Liz Warren lost because she's too competent. ?? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 1 minute ago, Kemp said: Hey Joe. You're still here, so how about an answer? I answered your question. Fake. Knowing the atlantic, they probably de-contextualized a statement to editorialize. Remember, these are the people who acted in concert with people who attempted to overturn a legitimate election and lied to do so. So yes, ANYTHING they publish is fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan1959 Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 (edited) 11 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Weight of the data is pretty obvious. I'll leave that alone. On reopening, my general POV is that there probably isn't a one size fits all solution, and that reopening probably will have to be gradual, both in terms of geography and industry. The Cuomo approach seems to be a smart one, and the grouping of linked areas (e.g., tri-state area around NYC) makes a lot of sense. Whether the weight of the data supports that position I can't say - I haven't studied the issue sufficiently to reach such a conclusion. So, the weight of the data is pretty obvious; however, you haven't studied the issue of reopening enough to know whether the weight of the data supports it? Just an observation: If you don't know whether the weight of the data supports a position, then the weight of the data isn't that obvious. And if you haven't studied the issue of reopening enough to reach a conclusion, then maybe you should do so before calling out other people's opinions. Edited May 5, 2020 by billsfan1959 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reality Check Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 5 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: It's patently fake that he/she/it/whatever watches the President daily. For the record, I don't watch ANY television news outlet. It's all trash. You know that video recordings exist of things he says right? Not watching them doesn’t change what he says. You are in denial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 Just now, Joe in Winslow said: Fake. Knowing the atlantic, they probably de-contextualized a statement to editorialize. Remember, these are the people who acted in concert with people who attempted to overturn a legitimate election and lied to do so. So yes, ANYTHING they publish is fake. There it is. Joe short-circuited when confronted with something he could not answer. Don't feel bad Joe. None of your friends will be able to answer, either. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted May 5, 2020 Share Posted May 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: So yes, ANYTHING they publish is fake. lol I wouldn't even say that about OAN. You are Fake, Joe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts