Warren Zevon Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 11 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: They are after yet another whistleblower! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 ERIC CIAMARELLA IS NOT A “WHISTLEBLOWER,” HE’S AN OPERATIVE: Schiff Hides Transcript to Protect ‘Whistleblower.’ The Democrats’ Last Ditch Effort To Upend the Trump Trial New York Sun, by Editorial Original Article Has the Trump impeachment drama reached its Brett Kavanaugh or Clarence Thomas moment? That would be the moment when, after the hearings are more or less done and it looks like the target will survive, the Democrats confect a last ditch scandal to block, in the case of the two justices, Senate confirmation or, in the case of President Trump, acquittal. We confess we’ve been expecting something to be brought up at the last minute. It is, after all, the Democratic Party’s modus operandi. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: They are after yet another whistleblower! The Soros cubicle farm has been trying to reach you. You are supposed to be doing pro-Sanders propaganda today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 minute ago, RochesterRob said: The Soros cubicle farm has been trying to reach you. You are supposed to be doing pro-Sanders propaganda today. You are such an idiot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob in Mich Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 I have been watching Fox this morning to see how the Bolton book has been covered. They are hammering the point that the timing is aligned with the book release. Step 1 - attack credibility. Step 2 - focus on the evil leaker to the NYT rather than issue. In addition, they say the President is denying it. If Trump denies something, I think it was Ainsley claimed we have to believe him. After all with his record of honesty above all else, no one could question his side of the story, right? I don't think this Bolton news moves the needle for the Republican Senators. They just need to find a defensible position. If they keep their eyes and ears closed, there are still a lot of those. I am coming around to the idea though that this Senate Hearing may end up hurting Republican Senators in the longer run. It seems to me that over time more evidence of these misdeeds surfaces. It looks worse and worse for those that claim that they don't want to hear any more possible evidence. Seems political opponents of the Repub Senators will point out the dishonesty of this willful blindness during future campaigns. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Just now, Tiberius said: You are such an idiot Your replies are being read in the voice of Piotr Rosmenko today who was the prototypical Eastern European man on Laugh-In done by the late great Arte Johnson. As far as staying on subject your employers MEAN IT. They have a vested interest in having Sanders create as much havoc as possible in the US political system and by golly you are going to get with the program as long as you are drawing a paycheck from them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 https://twitter.com/RepLeeZeldin/status/1221584242230075394 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 minute ago, Bob in Mich said: I have been watching Fox this morning to see how the Bolton book has been covered. They are hammering the point that the timing is aligned with the book release. Step 1 - attack credibility. Step 2 - focus on the evil leaker to the NYT rather than issue. In addition, they say the President is denying it. If Trump denies something, I think it was Ainsley claimed we have to believe him. After all with his record of honesty above all else, no one could question his side of the story, right? I don't think this Bolton news moves the needle for the Republican Senators. They just need to find a defensible position. If they keep their eyes and ears closed, there are still a lot of those. I am coming around to the idea though that this Senate Hearing may end up hurting Republican Senators in the longer run. It seems to me that over time more evidence of these misdeeds surfaces. It looks worse and worse for those that claim that they don't want to hear any more possible evidence. Seems political opponents of the Repub Senators will point out the dishonesty of this willful blindness during future campaigns. question for you, if you don't mind, Bob. did you pay attention to the Kavanaugh Hearings? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 11 minutes ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/RepLeeZeldin/status/1221584242230075394 Just call witnesses now, it's a trial! No taxes, no witnesses, no documents, no allowing cabinet officials to get Senate approval. This will no end well for Trump in the long run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob in Mich Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, Foxx said: question for you, if you don't mind, Bob. did you pay attention to the Kavanaugh Hearings? Not too closely but some. Why is that relevant to my Bolton book comments? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Not too closely but some. Why is that relevant to my Bolton book comments? ThE dEmS hAvE dOnE tHiS bEfOrE (The Dems didn't do anything. One of Trump's former appointees (likely) leaked a portion of his book that is bad for the president) Edited January 27, 2020 by Gary Busey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 A MERE TECHNICALITY: Dershowitz: Democrats’ case meritless because no crime committed. Appearing on Fox News Sunday, Dershowitz, a member of Trump’s defense team, said Democrats had not made a sufficient case to charge the president with a crime as they presented their arguments in 24 hours over three days. “The conduct has to be criminal in nature — it can’t be abuse of power, it can’t be obstruction of Congress,” he said referring to the two charges laid out in the articles of impeachment against Trump. “Those are precisely the arguments that the framers rejected.” To be fair, Democrats reject the Framers and the Constitution for a whole lot of things. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 16 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Not too closely but some. Why is that relevant to my Bolton book comments? go back and look at the timeline of events. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 The Left's John Bolton ‘Hail Mary’ is proof we are watching Kavanaugh Part 2. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 I have yet to see anyone talk up Bolton's character. That's a talking point without evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 "Bolton bombshell" is only a bombshell in the minds of Twitterati and MSNBC/WaPo types. Do you really think ordinary people are going to be like, "Hmm, this really changes my mind. You see, the timeline asserted has been shifted by XYZ"? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob in Mich Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Just now, Foxx said: go back and look at the timeline of events. No, I will not go back to Kavanaugh hearing articles looking for some vague connection. If you want to make a point for discussion, please just state your point. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 5 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: No, I will not go back to Kavanaugh hearing articles looking for some vague connection. If you want to make a point for discussion, please just state your point. are you saying you don't want to investigate things yourself, that you would rather have your opinions fed to you? because... that's what it sure sounds like. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts