Chef Jim Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: Morning third, hope all is well with you Turley also confessed, “The use of military aid for a quid pro quo to investigate one’s political opponent, if proven, can be an impeachable offense.” Kicking you in the nuts, if proven (gotta have nuts to kick), is a prosecutable offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 17 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: (Better clip) *************** Schiff did that? Well golly! ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 5, 2019 Author Share Posted December 5, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Schiff did that? Well golly! ? HAHA Gator, once again putting 2 and 2 together and coming up with zero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: not that it could or would happen (as this is not Horowitz purview) but how satisfying would it be to see certain members arrested right there on national TV while the sham is being conducted? Edited December 5, 2019 by Foxx 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1202616255276109824 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1202616406522703875 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 11 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: HAHA Gator, once again putting 2 and 2 together and coming up with zero. Which 2? 2 and -2 is zero! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 Adam Schiff is back in the news in a big way. He’s about as funny as a rubber crutch, but it can’t be wrong to call a timeout to laugh at him. Tom Shillue has mastered the bizarreries of Schiff’s deportment in a manner that brings insight to impersonation. The compilation of Shillue clips below made me laugh out loud. It is the second of two such compilations on YouTube. The first is here. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 11 minutes ago, Foxx said: not that it could or would happen (as this is not Horowitz purview) but how satisfying would it be to see certain members arrested right there on national TV while the sham is being conducted? It would look something like this: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 34 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: She looks like she is short-circuiting. Between Nancy and Joey-B it appears that Democratic leadership could get a group discount at the local dementia home. It is past time for her to retire. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 8 minutes ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1202616255276109824 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1202616406522703875 Hmmmn, OIG report is coming out on Monday. Probably just a coincidence. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 5, 2019 Author Share Posted December 5, 2019 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 Tins- the Garth of PPP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 1 hour ago, Foxx said: you're incredulous. the only tort you have to my impeaching your statement about Karlan making an apology is to resort to grammar police? then in an attempt to slam me, you try to imply something about my quoting pedophile sources. what the ***** are you going on about here? Incredible and retort are the words you're looking for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 11 minutes ago, John Adams said: Incredible and retort are the words you're looking for. i had to Google Scott Ritter to find the allegations against him. thank you for making me aware, though the nature in which you attempted to do so is a bit *****. while we are here, are you claiming his alleged crime also invalidates the allegations that the alleged gas attacks by Assad were manufactured? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 14 minutes ago, Foxx said: i had to Google Scott Ritter to find the allegations against him. thank you for making me aware, though the nature in which you attempted to do so is a bit *****. He's a skeevy guy and I noted it, and I'm the jerk? Mmm-kay. 14 minutes ago, Foxx said: while we are here, are you claiming his alleged crime... Sorry bud, he was convicted. And both of his arrests were not ever really disputed. He's a 100% creep. We were commenting on the guy you follow. Attacking the source is one of the PPP gang's favorite activities is it not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Goat Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 5, 2019 Author Share Posted December 5, 2019 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 48 minutes ago, John Adams said: He's a skeevy guy and I noted it, and I'm the jerk? Mmm-kay. Sorry bud, he was convicted. And both of his arrests were not ever really disputed. He's a 100% creep. We were commenting on the guy you follow. Attacking the source is one of the PPP gang's favorite activities is it not? yes, the way you attempted to shame me was jerky. i don't expect you to understand that however. you say it like i supported him when he was merely the conduit for allegations. okay, he was convicted, duly noted.. again, your being a ***** and didn't answer my question. attacking a source can be legitimate, yes. however this is not the Washington Post or the NYTimes, both of which have obvious conflicts in their reporting. is/was there an obvious conflict with what was being reported here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, John Adams said: He's a skeevy guy and I noted it, and I'm the jerk? Mmm-kay. Sorry bud, he was convicted. And both of his arrests were not ever really disputed. He's a 100% creep. We were commenting on the guy you follow. Attacking the source is one of the PPP gang's favorite activities is it not? here, i'll show you what being jerky looks like... you know, just so you can get a 'shoe on the other foot perspective'. should we get into your PM to me just prior to Thanksgiving trying to explain away your deletion of certain postings on the forum with regard to pedophilia? are you mad because i essentially told you to ***** off? Edited December 5, 2019 by Foxx 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts