bdutton Posted November 11, 2018 Share Posted November 11, 2018 https://i.imgur.com/dlJErga.mp4 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 Trumpy Bear is killin' me. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 2 hours ago, LABillzFan said: Trumpy Bear is killin' me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 CNN and Acosta sue not just the White House, but also individual secret service agent because Acosta is classy like that. https://mobile.twitter.com/charliespiering/status/1062351684750458885 https://mobile.twitter.com/AP/status/1062352634995269632 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: CNN and Acosta sue not just the White House, but also individual secret service agent because Acosta is classy like that. https://mobile.twitter.com/charliespiering/status/1062351684750458885 https://mobile.twitter.com/AP/status/1062352634995269632 The WH was probably going to let him come back to the briefings after a short time, that makes for a more effective example for the rest. But now............................they almost have to keep him out due to the lawsuit..................... . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: CNN and Acosta sue not just the White House, but also individual secret service agent because Acosta is classy like that. https://mobile.twitter.com/charliespiering/status/1062351684750458885 https://mobile.twitter.com/AP/status/1062352634995269632 On what grounds? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Just now, TakeYouToTasker said: On what grounds? I haven't read the complaint yet, but I heard (not confirmed) it cites both 1st and 5th amendment concerns 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 I'm suing for access. I wrote a few articles in school, have doesn't a few press releases, and once did a Madlibs by myself. Accosta is a that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: I haven't read the complaint yet, but I heard (not confirmed) it cites both 1st and 5th amendment concerns Acosta is asserting that he, individually, has the right to be in the White House press pool? On First Amendment grounds? That's insane. And the insanity doesn't even begin to touch on a Fifth Amendment concerns, which is even more laughable. He should be beaten with a length of rubber hose. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 12 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I haven't read the complaint yet, but I heard (not confirmed) it cites both 1st and 5th amendment concerns Oh, just ***** that *****ery. Acosta doesn't have a First Amendment right to be an ass to the rest of the press corps. CNN might have a First Amendment right to be present at briefings - I'd argue they do - but that right is not embodied in the person of Acosta, and they can assign someone else. 5th Amendment... Quote No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. What crime was he punished for? What double jeopardy was he subjected to? What testimony against himself was he compelled to give? What life, liberty, or property was taken from him? What private property was taken for him without compensation? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 23 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I haven't read the complaint yet, but I heard (not confirmed) it cites both 1st and 5th amendment concerns Is that asshat is trying to claim he has a property right in his 'hard pass'? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Just now, Koko78 said: Is that asshat is trying to claim he has a property right in his 'hard pass'? Only possible thing that makes sense. Can't wait until the court forces the White House to give it back, then they take it away again, then he sues for double jeopardy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 32 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: I'm suing for access. I wrote a few articles in school, have doesn't a few press releases, and once did a Madlibs by myself. Accosta is a that. Those must have been done on a keyboard designed for a person with ten thumbs, right? I was going to highlight "have doesn't" and ask you if you meant half dozen but realized that your entire post deserved highlighting because WTF? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 (edited) 32 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Oh, just ***** that *****ery. Acosta doesn't have a First Amendment right to be an ass to the rest of the press corps. CNN might have a First Amendment right to be present at briefings - I'd argue they do - but that right is not embodied in the person of Acosta, and they can assign someone else. I'm not sure that they do. That would be an argument that all press outlets have the right to be in the briefing room. I would argue that their First Amendment protections are limited to the Government's lacking of the authority to silence them, or to prosecute them for publishing or disseminating. Being in the briefing room is a privilege. Quote 5th Amendment... What crime was he punished for? What double jeopardy was he subjected to? What testimony against himself was he compelled to give? What life, liberty, or property was taken from him? What private property was taken for him without compensation? Exactly this. 5 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Those must have been done on a keyboard designed for a person with ten thumbs, right? I was going to highlight "have doesn't" and ask you if you meant half dozen but realized that your entire post deserved highlighting because WTF? I'm pretty sure this was the Madlibs he was talking about. Also, golf is a sport. Edited November 13, 2018 by TakeYouToTasker 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: I'm not sure that they do. That would be an argument that all press outlets have the right to be in the briefing room. Not just all outlets, but specific people from those outlets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, GG said: Not just all outlets, but specific people from those outlets. I was addressing Tom's narrow argument that CNN has the First Amendment right to be in the briefing room. However the absurdist in me would I'd love to see liberals successfully arguing that corporations are people. Edited November 13, 2018 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 4 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: I'm not sure that they do. That would be an argument that all press outlets have the right to be in the briefing room. I would argue that their First Amendment protections are limited to the Government's lacking of the authority to silence them, or to prosecute them for publishing or disseminating. Being in the briefing room is a privilege. Exactly this. I'm pretty sure this was the Madlibs he was talking about. Also, golf is a sport. Of course it is. I was obsessed with it for years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 1 minute ago, TakeYouToTasker said: I was addressing Tom's narrow argument that CNN has the First Amendment right to be in the briefing room. However the absurdist in my would I'd love to see liberals successfully arguing that corporations are people. Especially in light of their opposition to Citizens United Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Just now, GG said: Especially in light of their opposition to Citizens United Exactly my point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts