Jump to content

Cali Mileage Tax


Dante

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, westerndecline said:

Its already been proven for yrs with the tiny house examples

 

Once the solar panel is put in place, u may pay for propane once a month, some type of insignificant camper lot fee, rain water sustainability, etc

 

Ur left paying for basic maintenance of any standard living qtrs

 

 

Per month

rent zero or 50$

Water maybe 10$

Propane 10-20$

Electricity virtually zero maybe 50$ per month savings for maintenance

 

 

 

This isnt even considering electic cars which would eliminate fuel cost and focus on battery efficiency

 

U can already take a couple heavy duty car batteries and a converter to supply massive energy

Random

 

An absolutely bizarre post; the massive blanks between sentences notwithstanding. 

Way too much to comment on, but as a start, this nonsense of a one unit solar panel indicates gross ignorance, and it isn't the first time.

As a guy who has looked at this for a long time, and it takes just a second, you don't get any kind of efficiency with a solar panel.

It takes a lot of solar panels and a lot of storage capacity to hold what is realized potential.

Evidently, you don't know that.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

An absolutely bizarre post; the massive blanks between sentences notwithstanding. 

Way too much to comment on, but as a start, this nonsense of a one unit solar panel indicates gross ignorance, and it isn't the first time.

As a guy who has looked at this for a long time, and it takes just a second, you don't get any kind of efficiency with a solar panel.

It takes a lot of solar panels and a lot of storage capacity to hold what is realized potential.

Evidently, you don't know that.

 

 

 

Dude 

 

What solar panels are you talking about

 

Honestly.

 

Im curious because ive seen it work first hand, and there are thousands of ppl off grid that contradict your thoughts.

 

Again

 

Either youre consuming a ridiculous massive amount of energy or youre simply ideological

 

Here man . another example among thousands of green sustainable living that has eliminated her rent, and crazy utility $

 

I dont know wtf fantasy land youre living in

 

I sincerely think its ideological with u

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, westerndecline said:

 

Here man . another example among thousands of green sustainable living that has eliminated her rent, and crazy utility $

 

I dont know wtf fantasy land youre living in

 

I sincerely think its ideological with u

 

Do you have friends who can help you?

This is another link to someone who has nothing to do with green, sustainable energy.

Do you actually understand what those terms mean?

 

Again, as your other link, she is using propane and wood.

Do you get that?

 

The void between what you post and what reality is, is vast, but here is a start.

Reducing the amount of square footage you use is not "green," when you are using propane and wood to solve your heat issues.


Evidently, since you've made that claim twice, this concept exceeds you.

 

Good luck.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is our disagreement just on space and lifestyles???

 

Will u admit this couple's cost is a virtual zero?

 

Otherwise ur just trolling and its messageboard laughs

I mean u keep saying propane and wood and thts like 25-50$ a month

 

And thts in the winter.....(MAXIMUM)

 

hell u can cut the wood for a whole month in an hour with a buddy

 

Do u not get tht???

Edited by westerndecline
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cost has nothing to do with whether it is green or not.

Propane is not nearly as efficient as natgas, and it certainly isn't "green" nor sustainable.

Burning wood is absolutely not "green," and it's an uncomfortable heat.

 

What you have "discovered," and misnamed it minimalist, is the RV lifestyle, and it has been around for a century.

The travelling woman, (the one with "Ventura Highway" in the background), is literally living in an rv in an rv park with rv electrical and water hookups.

Thousands of people do it, and with far more efficient rigs than that thing she is towing around.

If she was not in a park, and totally self contained, it would be called "boondocking," but she isn't.

Go to http://www.irv2.com/forums and see if you recognize anything.

 

Nothing you have ever posted in this thread backs up the claims you made in the third post of this thread, regarding how cheap green energy is.

Your claim that someone threw up a solar panel and collects rain water and therefore has "no utilities" is crazy, and repeatedly throwing up links to wood burning propane users is meaningless, not green, not efficient, not comfortable and certainly not for a family.

 

And by the way, you mentioned in your post with that link that she has "eliminated her rent."

That is absolutely not true. She is paying for those RV water and 20 amp service hookups in any RV park she stays in. Guaranteed.
She just didn't tell you about it. 

Done with this nonsense.

 

 

Edited by sherpa
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

I find all taxes to be fairly invasive, so I tend toward tax structures whichat least  allow the individuals consuming services to be billed proportionately.  I conceded that no form of taxation is ideal, and all are onerous.  

 

The way I would implement it would be a meter reading when your car is inspected, with itemized deductions for out of state travel.

 

When your car is inspected?  What's that?  I suggest you learn about how things work in all 50 before you go recommending things.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

When your car is inspected?  What's that?  I suggest you learn about how things work in all 50 before you go recommending things.  

It's something that happens in others states which could be implemented in California, which is what is being discussed.

 

If we're being dickheads however,  I'm not dumb enough to live there so I really don't care if they replace the revenue by jacking up income taxes to 30% or more.  They have income taxes in California, right Jim?  You're not going to claim some sort of stupid victory through ignorance of that concept as well, are you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, westerndecline said:

Dude 

 

What solar panels are you talking about

 

Honestly.

 

Im curious because ive seen it work first hand, and there are thousands of ppl off grid that contradict your thoughts.

 

Again

 

Either youre consuming a ridiculous massive amount of energy or youre simply ideological

 

Here man . another example among thousands of green sustainable living that has eliminated her rent, and crazy utility $

 

I dont know wtf fantasy land youre living in

 

I sincerely think its ideological with u

 

I'll have to show this video to my wife and see if she'll go for that in retirement.  Problem for me though is I need about a 2000sf garage with a lot of bright lights.

Edited by keepthefaith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, sherpa said:

The cost has nothing to do with whether it is green or not.

Propane is not nearly as efficient as natgas, and it certainly isn't "green" nor sustainable.

Burning wood is absolutely not "green," and it's an uncomfortable heat.

 

What you have "discovered," and misnamed it minimalist, is the RV lifestyle, and it has been around for a century.

The travelling woman, (the one with "Ventura Highway" in the background), is literally living in an rv in an rv park with rv electrical and water hookups.

Thousands of people do it, and with far more efficient rigs than that thing she is towing around.

If she was not in a park, and totally self contained, it would be called "boondocking," but she isn't.

Go to http://www.irv2.com/forums and see if you recognize anything.

 

Nothing you have ever posted in this thread backs up the claims you made in the third post of this thread, regarding how cheap green energy is.

Your claim that someone threw up a solar panel and collects rain water and therefore has "no utilities" is crazy, and repeatedly throwing up links to wood burning propane users is meaningless, not green, not efficient, not comfortable and certainly not for a family.

 

And by the way, you mentioned in your post with that link that she has "eliminated her rent."

That is absolutely not true. She is paying for those RV water and 20 amp service hookups in any RV park she stays in. Guaranteed.
She just didn't tell you about it. 

Done with this nonsense.

 

 

So it is lifestyle

 

Enjoy paying for rent and oil retard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why any of you are indulging this "tiny house" foolishness in a discussion about mainstream life style energy consumption and revenue replacement.

 

"California won't need to replace revenues lost with the elimination of taxes associated with fossil fuel consumption because it's possible to live an almost cost free existence if you reside in a well insulated shed and drink rain water!"

 

 

 

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

I'm not sure why any of you are indulging this "tiny house" foolishness in a discussion about mainstream life style energy consumption and revenue replacement.

 

"California won't need to replace revenues lost with the elimination of taxes associated with fossil fuel consumption because it's possible to live an almost cost free existence if you reside in a well insulated shed and drink rain water!"

 

 

 

You just don't understand. She doesn't pay rent, it's a camping fee!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...