OCinBuffalo Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 (edited) 19 minutes ago, westerndecline said: Lol can you show the logical fallacy ? Can you go look up ad hominem, and provide a definition, as well as an example of its practical use, to this board? Edited December 8, 2017 by OCinBuffalo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westerndecline Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Just now, OCinBuffalo said: Can you go look up adhominem, and provide a definition, as well as an example of its practical use, to this board? When attack a person personally insteadof their arguments Which is what Tom did, so I returned the favor If he's constantly using ad hominem. It's impossible to debate U see the difference??? Not to mention stalking.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 3 minutes ago, westerndecline said: When attack a person personally insteadof their arguments Which is what Tom did, so I returned the favor If he's constantly using ad hominem. It's impossible to debate U see the difference??? Not to mention stalking.... You just called DC_Tom a name {{ }} yet you've been invoking "ad hominem" for the last 3 pages. It's not impossible to debate, because there is no debate: you are either an unmitigated moron, or, you're a hypocrite. Choose. I eagerly await() your response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Tra la la lala la la tra la la lala la la Flipping like a pancake popping like a cork fleagle bingo drooper and snork Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 3 minutes ago, row_33 said: Tra la la lala la la tra la la lala la la Flipping like a pancake popping like a cork fleagle bingo drooper and snork Which...unfortunately, is about the best we can expect from you here, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, OCinBuffalo said: Which...unfortunately, is about the best we can expect from you here, isn't it? You get a participation trophy for that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 1 minute ago, row_33 said: You get a participation trophy for that one. Speaking of irony.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Well duh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 (edited) 20 minutes ago, row_33 said: Tra la la lala la la tra la la lala la la Flipping like a pancake popping like a cork fleagle bingo drooper and snork Thanks...........................an obscure 60's "saturday morning" show reference was just what I needed as a break from the "OC setting up an unaware westerndecline" faceoff . Edited December 8, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 It was a great show, they all had their own breakfast cereals as well, but the Danger Island segments were a bit spooky for young kids. besides, love is kinda crazy with a spooky little tramp like blue..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westerndecline Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 21 minutes ago, OCinBuffalo said: You just called DC_Tom a name {{ }} yet you've been invoking "ad hominem" for the last 3 pages. It's not impossible to debate, because there is no debate: you are either an unmitigated moron, or, you're a hypocrite. Choose. I eagerly await() your response. If u keep posting reasons And Tom keeps calling u a dumbass ( ad hominem) You then call him a dick face Because, BECAUSE HE WONT DEBATE that's called a person who u can't debate because they refuse to debate Get it???? Ppl can't be this !@#$in stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Just now, westerndecline said: If u keep posting reasons And Tom keeps calling u a dumbass ( ad hominem) You then call him a dick face Because, BECAUSE HE WONT DEBATE that's called a person who u can't debate because they refuse to debate Get it???? Quoted for...I dunno...perhaps some poster with experience in mental health can aid in explaining...this abortion. Rest assured: I will keep posting...reason. 7 minutes ago, B-Man said: Thanks...........................an obscure 60's "saturday morning" show reference was just what I needed as a break from the "OC setting up an unaware westerndecline" faceoff . I'm not old enough to remember your nostalgia, and never going to care. Perhaps you can share it with the other nurses on your shift. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 15, 2017 Share Posted December 15, 2017 BREAKING: Net Neutrality Repealed, Left Loses Its DAMN MIND https://www.dailywire.com/news/24691/breaking-net-neutrality-repealed-left-loses-its-ben-sh LIVE look at planet earth after FCC repeals Obama-era net neutrality rules: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulus Posted December 15, 2017 Share Posted December 15, 2017 Can any supporters of removing net neutrality tell me why it is a good thing? I'm beat, sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted December 15, 2017 Share Posted December 15, 2017 1 hour ago, Paulus said: Can any supporters of removing net neutrality tell me why it is a good thing? I'm beat, sorry. Do you think that a highly competitive and innovative industry in the 21st century should be regulated like a 1870's railroad monopoly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted December 15, 2017 Share Posted December 15, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, Paulus said: Can any supporters of removing net neutrality tell me why it is a good thing? I'm beat, sorry. Look no further than this very thread: On 11/22/2017 at 6:41 PM, GG said: This is the official ruling in the Fed Register. But your link also lays out the ridiculous assertion by Netflix & Google. They are taking a disproportionate share of Internet traffic, but want others to pay for that transit. On 11/22/2017 at 6:52 PM, GG said: Plenty of discussion on this in the past. Do a search. But basically by reclassifying the ISPs as common carriers meant that they had to treat everyone the same and not prioritize services by fee or content. Sounds great to liberals, but breaks down in practice, because Netflix demands are much greater than Mario's corner pizza shop. So ISPs must upgrade their networks to transmit Netflix traffic, but can't charge Netflix more money for the transit. So if the ISPs can't charge Netflix for the usage, guess who gets to pay the bill at the end of the day? On 11/27/2017 at 5:16 PM, Azalin said: Not only ridiculous, but obvious. All anyone needs to do is look at the relative lack of progress in telecom up to January 8th, 1982 compared with the explosion of innovation between then and 2015 to see exactly what government regulation of the telecom industry did versus what deregulation did. People need to stop making this a political issue, and should always support keeping federal regulators out of it. And since when has government ever needed to prove anything before seizing regulatory power over something? On 12/1/2017 at 3:28 PM, GG said: The intention of the currently proposed rules is to: GET THE FCC OUT OF REGULATING THE INTERNET. On 12/5/2017 at 1:45 PM, TakeYouToTasker said: In a world with no net neutrality, the people who are consumers of Netflix will foot the bill. In a world with net neutrality everyone will carry the freight for the people actually doing the consuming. And this article in particular is good: 4 hours ago, B-Man said: BREAKING: Net Neutrality Repealed, Left Loses Its DAMN MIND https://www.dailywire.com/news/24691/breaking-net-neutrality-repealed-left-loses-its-ben-sh Edited December 15, 2017 by Azalin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 15, 2017 Share Posted December 15, 2017 42 minutes ago, GG said: Do you think that a highly competitive and innovative industry in the 21st century should be regulated like a 1870's railroad monopoly? That alone should be enough reason for everyone. Even if you support Net Neutrality, it makes zero sense to do it within the framework of a century-old law. If Democrats had ANY sense, they'd see Trump's rescinding of Obama's bull **** for what it is: a chance to address these issues correctly via legislation. Too bad they're crypto-fascists who've lost sight of the concept of "legislature." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 15, 2017 Share Posted December 15, 2017 (edited) News flash: the ISPs are going to charge more for service regardless of whether or not Netflix pays more. To act like consumers will pay less because of this ruling is disingenuous at best. This ruling is a power play by the ISPs to clamp down on non commercial below board streamers, not Netflix, nothing more nothing less Edited December 15, 2017 by joesixpack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWATeam Posted December 15, 2017 Share Posted December 15, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, joesixpack said: News flash: the ISPs are going to charge more for service regardless of whether or not Netflix pays more. To act like consumers will pay less because of this ruling is disingenuous at best. This ruling is a power play by the ISPs to clamp down on non commercial below board streamers, not Netflix, nothing more nothing less No, no... now that the poor internet companies can charge giants like Netflix their fair share, I’m sure prices will drop for everyone else! And I’m sure Netflix won’t pass on these extra costs to the consumer, either. Edited December 15, 2017 by SWATeam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted December 15, 2017 Share Posted December 15, 2017 3 hours ago, joesixpack said: News flash: the ISPs are going to charge more for service regardless of whether or not Netflix pays more. To act like consumers will pay less because of this ruling is disingenuous at best. This ruling is a power play by the ISPs to clamp down on non commercial below board streamers, not Netflix, nothing more nothing less Why can't it be both? BTW, why do you think all you can eat data plans went the way of the do do bird? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts