SectionC3 Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 10 minutes ago, Foxx said: So it’s Made in America? I don’t follow. I’’m not sure if I should focus on Again Making America Great Again or on Keeping America Great. Please help! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 (edited) 17 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: So it’s Made in America? I don’t follow. I’’m not sure if I should focus on Again Making America Great Again or on Keeping America Great. Please help! maybe this will help... https://youtu.be/XKN3z6zGGN8?t=23 Edited June 11, 2020 by Foxx 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 From the First Page, Judge Gleeson’s Brief Against Flynn is a Travesty by Andrea Widburg Original Article You know a lawyer’s bluffing if he inundates the court with case authority for an ostensibly simple principle. The amicus brief that Judge Gleeson filed with Judge Sullivan in the Flynn case has those string cites. Gleeson’s bluffing. Worse, he’s lying. It’s typical for dishonest attorneys to use fake citations – cases that do not stand for the principles asserted -- in their endless string sites, hoping no one will check. This what Judge Gleeson did in his brief: Every one of his 14 citations in footnote two on page 1 is a lie. That’s all you need to know about his brief. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 9 minutes ago, B-Man said: From the First Page, Judge Gleeson’s Brief Against Flynn is a Travesty by Andrea Widburg Original Article You know a lawyer’s bluffing if he inundates the court with case authority for an ostensibly simple principle. The amicus brief that Judge Gleeson filed with Judge Sullivan in the Flynn case has those string cites. Gleeson’s bluffing. Worse, he’s lying. It’s typical for dishonest attorneys to use fake citations – cases that do not stand for the principles asserted -- in their endless string sites, hoping no one will check. This what Judge Gleeson did in his brief: Every one of his 14 citations in footnote two on page 1 is a lie. That’s all you need to know about his brief. Says the journalist. Hoax! 15 minutes ago, Foxx said: maybe this will help... https://youtu.be/XKN3z6zGGN8?t=23 How would that help in my effort to Keep Making America Great Keep Make Again? I beg you, sir, please help me understand whether we are Again Making America Great Again or if we’re focused on Keeping America Great now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 1 hour ago, Foxx said: Grenell set the bar pretty high here... And Ratcliffe delivers. Down goes the ICA: 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: First batch of newly declassed material is out. The target: the ICA. As expected, yet lied about by Brennan and Comey for years, the Steele Dossier was used in it as a basis, despite knowing at the time it was bunk. Important context (both clips) So, now we KNOW for sure there was no "hack" of the DNC (CrowdStrike confirmed that this week). That was the central thrust of the ICA, now shown to be a complete hoax. We also know, now, that the FBI and CIA had information the Russians didn't care who won but Brennan kept that from the report, instead only including the pieces of "intel" (used loosely) that made it look like Russia only wanted Trump to win and planned to reward him financially. It was always a coup. 57 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Says the journalist. Hoax! She's an attorney. So, no hoax. But it's good to see you can't really identify your own. Proving again what a shite lawyer you really are. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 On 5/18/2017 at 8:27 AM, B-Man said: Robert Mueller: A Solid Choice for Trump-Russia Investigation ‘Special Counsel’ by Andrew C McCarthy Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/447730/robert-mueller-special-counsel-donald-trump-russia-investigation The right wingers loved Mueller when he was appointed 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdutton Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 3 minutes ago, Warren Zevon said: The right wingers loved Mueller when he was appointed Mueller was a figurehead for the investigation. Weissmann was the lead investigator. And they didn't find *****. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 7 minutes ago, Warren Zevon said: The right wingers loved Mueller when he was appointed Imagine that. People can change an informed opinion when more facts are discovered. 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 2 minutes ago, bdutton said: Mueller was a figurehead for the investigation. Weissmann was the lead investigator. And they didn't find *****. Cool. The right wingers still loved Mueller when he was appointed. Just now, GG said: Imagine that. People can change an informed opinion when more facts are discovered. Right - like Mueller leading a coup against the duly elected POTUS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 1 minute ago, bdutton said: Mueller was a figurehead for the investigation. Weissmann was the lead investigator. And they didn't find *****. Worse, we now know the Mueller team knew in January of 2017 -- nearly half a year before Mueller was ever appointed -- that there was no crime there. Yet they pushed it ahead anyway under false pretenses. Gary doesn't want to talk about that, because there's no defense of it. None. And Gary is too dishonest and too committed to defending the indefensible that he's incapable of doing anything more than reminding us how dumb he truly is. Over, and over again. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Worse, we now know the Mueller team knew in January of 2017 -- nearly half a year before Mueller was ever appointed -- that there was no crime there. Yet they pushed it ahead anyway under false pretenses. True - #WWG1WGA - Mueller and his team should be sentenced accordingly. Any thoughts on Cash Cab? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 2 minutes ago, Warren Zevon said: Right - like Mueller leading a coup against the duly elected POTUS. The facts certainly point in that direction. He may not have been the leader, but he certainly abetted the process. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 26 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: And Ratcliffe delivers. Down goes the ICA: She's an attorney. So, no hoax. But it's good to see you can't really identify your own. Proving again what a shite lawyer you really are. Whose practice went so well that she is . . . A journalist! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 1 minute ago, Warren Zevon said: True - #WWG1WGA - Mueller and his team should be sentenced accordingly. Any thoughts on Cash Cab? Again, a dodge to hide his own ignorance. And, as I've said to you many times but you're just too dumb to remember: there's a difference between a Q post and an anon post. Focusing on what anons say is missing the point entirely. Which is why you continue to do it. You're allergic to honesty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 27 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: And Ratcliffe delivers. Down goes the ICA: She's an attorney. So, no hoax. But it's good to see you can't really identify your own. Proving again what a shite lawyer you really are. Got any other hot tips about the “case record” to share today? Or maybe you can regale us with tales of your hoaxy logic about how a declaration is the same as withdrawing a plea. Or, better yet, explain again how a case about charging discretion is deciding case law with respect to the prosecutorial abandonment issue in the Flynn case. Keep the hits coming, my man! Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Again, a dodge to hide his own ignorance. And, as I've said to you many times but you're just too dumb to remember: there's a difference between a Q post and an anon post. Focusing on what anons say is missing the point entirely. Which is why you continue to do it. You're allergic to honesty. That’s right. We all need to know the difference between Qs and Anons. It is the path to enlightenment. Thank you, sir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Again, a dodge to hide his own ignorance. And, as I've said to you many times but you're just too dumb to remember: there's a difference between a Q post and an anon post. Focusing on what anons say is missing the point entirely. Which is why you continue to do it. You're allergic to honesty. Are you an anon? I want to be part of the Q Munity. Teach me the ways. #WWG1WGA What is the difference between Qs and anons? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Just now, Warren Zevon said: Are you an anon? I want to be part of the Q Munity. Teach me the ways. #WWG1WGA Me too. This Q fellow is starting to piss me off. I’ve had enough of his disrespect for the Anons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Why is the symbolism behind Gugino's Twitter photo? Teach me, sir Rhino. #WWG1WGA 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Got any other hot tips about the “case record” to share today? Or maybe you can regale us with tales of your hoaxy logic about how a declaration is the same as withdrawing a plea. Or, better yet, explain again how a case about charging discretion is deciding case law with respect to the prosecutorial abandonment issue in the Flynn case. Keep the hits coming, my man! Want to see a grown man run away like a girl? Watch what happens now: 19 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Come on, SectionOfReallyShittyLawyers, put your money where your mouth is. If you think that filing was such a "takedown" then you must think Flynn's going to get sentenced. How bout we make a bet? If Flynn gets sentenced, and the case isn't dropped, I'll go on vacation for a year. When Flynn gets the case dismissed with prejudice, then you have to go on a vacation for a year. Or are you even more full of shite than I gave you credit for? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Want to see a grown man run away like a girl? Watch what happens now: What happened to #WWG1WGA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts