Deranged Rhino Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: Sullivan's attorney seems to be arguing... let's keep going. You never know what Sullivan is gonna do! Man, what Flynn has to say must really be something that the #resistance crowd is going to these lengths. Sullivan's attorney is floundering. Weakest of the three so far. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 I bet it comes down to (based on my knowing nothing): Trump judge - dismiss Obama judge - send back Reagan judge - ?♂️ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Sullivan's attorney is floundering. Weakest of the three so far. She's latched on to her only good argument -- that this motion for Mandamus is not timely. I think Sullivan's attorney is misrepresenting the reason why Sullivan appointed the Amicus. Sullivan's order said (if I remember) that the Amicus was supposed to take the position of the government because in this case there's nobody taking that position. That IS adversarial. She's arguing that the Amicus isn't adversarial. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 4 minutes ago, snafu said: She's latched on to her only good argument -- that this motion for Mandamus is not timely. I think Sullivan's attorney is misrepresenting the reason why Sullivan appointed the Amicus. Sullivan's order said (if I remember) that the Amicus was supposed to take the position of the government because in this case there's nobody taking that position. That IS adversarial. She's arguing that the Amicus isn't adversarial. Hoax. The amicus assists the court’s understanding of an issue or of the case as a whole. That’s not adversarial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 5 minutes ago, snafu said: I think Sullivan's attorney is misrepresenting the reason why Sullivan appointed the Amicus. Sullivan's order said (if I remember) that the Amicus was supposed to take the position of the government because in this case there's nobody taking that position. That IS adversarial. She's arguing that the Amicus isn't adversarial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 4 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Hoax. The amicus assists the court’s understanding of an issue or of the case as a whole. That’s not adversarial. Normally, I'd agree. However, in this case, Sullivan instructed Gleeson to argue as if he were the DOJ. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 (edited) Wall's summary is using Gleeson's brief against Sullivan to argue why mandamus now IS a timely request -- and why this case shouldn't go to argument on July 16. HaHa, that was a puffball question at the end there. Edited June 12, 2020 by snafu 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 Longer than expected, but an interesting hour and a half. Earliest action from the court expected Monday (I'm doubtful it'll be that fast, but who knows). 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 27 minutes ago, snafu said: Normally, I'd agree. However, in this case, Sullivan instructed Gleeson to argue as if he were the DOJ. Fair point. The amicus still is a friend, but in this case the friend has a unique role to play. I mostly agree with your response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Since Sullivan already has had time to "do the right thing and dismiss" - as a matter of fact, nothing is stopping him from doing it right now, well, nothing we concretely know, I am not certain what the point in continuing would be except to drag this out to when Sullivan "gets around" to signing. Edited June 12, 2020 by Buffalo_Gal 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 Who funds The Federalist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 49 minutes ago, Warren Zevon said: Who funds The Federalist? Why don't you look it up and get back to us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Cinga said: Why don't you look it up and get back to us? He's too busy trying to spread lies and gaslighting the board (then deleting the thread when he's exposed for doing precisely that). 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 Dream of FLYNNDICATIONNNN 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, Warren Zevon said: Dream of FLYNNDICATIONNNN Music memes don't work if you don't match the syllables Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 That's okay - liberals can't meme anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 (edited) And now he's here, to re-climb a hill he already died on. That's how desperate Gary's become. His cowardly dishonesty gets exposed (again), he deletes a thread then runs to try to change the subject from his own asshattery to ... a position he's going to end up looking foolish once again for supporting. Why does Gary do all this? Why does he go through so much trouble everyday just to troll? Because he's a bad person who is here with ill will and a mission to defend the indefensible. That's all he is. You can't even call him a man. He's like an early draft of a man where they just sketched out a giant, mangled skeleton but they didn't have time to add details like pigment or self-respect. He's Frankenstein's monster, if his monster was made entirely of dead dikks. Edited June 12, 2020 by Deranged Rhino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: C'mon dog - this was 9 minutes ago 9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: He should be ignored by all. Stop being intellectually dishonest 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts