ExiledInIllinois Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Interesting. I didn't think the national average was only 72% vaccinated. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/opinion/how-the-anti-vaxxers-are-winning.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Interesting. I didn't think the national average was only 72% vaccinated. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/opinion/how-the-anti-vaxxers-are-winning.html Pro Choice is winning! You should be pleased Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 No. They only like choice when it involves chopping up live fetuses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Interesting. I didn't think the national average was only 72% vaccinated. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/opinion/how-the-anti-vaxxers-are-winning.html That's good - it'll only take one or two good epidemics before there's 28% less traffic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Franklin Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 That's good - it'll only take one or two good epidemics before there's 28% less traffic. That's a population reduction plan I can get on board with. If you're too stupid to vaccinate, you're too stupid to breed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 That's good - it'll only take one or two good epidemics before there's 28% less traffic. Free abortions could do that! Pro-life=more traffic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 9, 2017 Author Share Posted February 9, 2017 Free abortions could do that! Pro-life=more traffic Just let a virus chop up the fetus. Win-win. Want less traffic & got rubella? Go stand next to a pregnant lady! How's that for choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Just let a virus chop up the fetus. Win-win. Want less traffic & got rubella? Go stand next to a pregnant lady! How's that for choice. It just kills me how the haters are so pro-life for fetuses and want everyone else to die. Rubella, lol! WHO | Rubella www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs367/en/ Rubella is a contagious, generally mild viral infection that occurs most often in children and young adults. Rubella infection in pregnant women may cause fetal death or congenital defects known as congenital rubella syndrome (CRS). ... While the illness is generally mild in children ... Its God's abortion solution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/death-teen-athlete-reminder-flu-can-kill-anyone-n718381 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 That's good - it'll only take one or two good epidemics before there's 28% less traffic. Don't be stealing Bill Maher lines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/death-teen-athlete-reminder-flu-can-kill-anyone-n718381 At least she didn't die autistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Don't be stealing Bill Maher lines Bill Burr, actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Bill Burr, actually. You know who else stole Bill Burr's lines? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 You know who else stole Bill Burr's lines? Ooh, wait - I know, I know! Goebbels, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Ooh, wait - I know, I know! Goebbels, right? I actually don't know, I was just asking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 You know who else stole Bill Burr's lines? Bill Maher? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 At least she didn't die autistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Bill Burr, actually. They probably had similar lines. Mahers is not exact but same idea. It is a good line. “I’m pro-choice, I’m for assisted suicide, I’m for regular suicide, I’m for whatever gets the freeway moving – that’s what I’m for,” said Maher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elroy16 Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 I actually don't know, I was just asking. I just assumed that was a dig at Amy Schumer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 You know who else stole Bill Burr's lines? Carlos Mencia? Amy Schumer? Dane Cook? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBrhDT3J9Hc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 That's a population reduction plan I can get on board with. If you're too stupid to vaccinate, you're too stupid to breed.but is it hillbillies in Kentucky and hoodrats in Chicago or is it stars like jenny McCarthy and hotties whom need to keep breeding successfully to ensure dove lotion stocks do not fall? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Franklin Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 (edited) Enters from stage left: Deranged with a link to the anti-vaccine movement. We set this thread up just for you! Edited February 9, 2017 by Benjamin Franklin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/death-teen-athlete-reminder-flu-can-kill-anyone-n718381enjoy your links even if you're not a frequent poster here. Thanks Carlos Mencia? Amy Schumer? Dane Cook? winning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBrhDT3J9Hc "Band everywhere?" I'm not watching something that's "band everywhere." Because...what the **** is "band everywhere?" Is that the band Paul McCartney sang about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Enters from stage left: Deranged with a link to the anti-vaccine movement. We set this thread up just for you! What's the title of the thread? Oh, right. What's evidence of how they're winning? Oh, right. "Band everywhere?" I'm not watching something that's "band everywhere." Because...what the **** is "band everywhere?" Is that the band Paul McCartney sang about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 9, 2017 Author Share Posted February 9, 2017 (edited) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBrhDT3J9Hc Can we bring in the illegals, refugees, heck even The Fugees... Inoculate them, then kick them back out again? "Fight terrorism! Make the whole world autistic!" -The Trump Plan What's the title of the thread? Oh, right. What's evidence of how they're winning? Oh, right. It was an OpEd piece, my OP link that is. But Trump does have the ear of Robert Kennedy III... Yes he is a lib loon! But that can't be good... Especially getting a Kennedy involved. :-/ Is that some evidence that the anti-vaxxer agenda may be winning. ?? Enters from stage left: Deranged with a link to the anti-vaccine movement. We set this thread up just for you! I don't think DR is anti-vaxxer. He did use the "scary" emoticon. Edited February 9, 2017 by ExiledInIllinois Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Is it true that vaccine companies can't be sued? Kind of weird if that's the case isn't it? "Supreme Court vaccine ruling: parents can't sue drug makers for kids' health problems. (AP) WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a federal law prohibits lawsuits against drug makers over serious side effects from childhood vaccines.Feb 23, 2011" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 9, 2017 Author Share Posted February 9, 2017 Is it true that vaccine companies can't be sued? Kind of weird if that's the case isn't it? "Supreme Court vaccine ruling: parents can't sue drug makers for kids' health problems. (AP) WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a federal law prohibits lawsuits against drug makers over serious side effects from childhood vaccines.Feb 23, 2011" There is this: https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/ https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/300aa-15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Is it true that vaccine companies can't be sued? Kind of weird if that's the case isn't it? "Supreme Court vaccine ruling: parents can't sue drug makers for kids' health problems. (AP) WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a federal law prohibits lawsuits against drug makers over serious side effects from childhood vaccines.Feb 23, 2011" Yes. It stems from the Swine Flu vaccination program in 1976-77. Short version: vaccine makers wouldn't participate without guarantees from liability. The Supreme Court decided that that protection extends to childhood vaccines, on the basis that you can't realistically sue a vaccine maker that's required to manufacture a mandatory vaccine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 So for Eric the Weird and others of his ilk, let's stipulate that Barron is Autistic. In that case, wouldn't it be a somewhat reasonable thing to try to find out what caused it and why there is such an epidemic of Autism - especially in boys in the US? RFK Jr. hasn't been given any authority other than to chair a commission to examine the issues. Sure he's a loon, as is Jenny McCarthy, but AFAIK that commission has zero power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Franklin Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 So for Eric the Weird and others of his ilk, let's stipulate that Barron is Autistic. In that case, wouldn't it be a somewhat reasonable thing to try to find out what caused it and why there is such an epidemic of Autism - especially in boys in the US? RFK Jr. hasn't been given any authority other than to chair a commission to examine the issues. Sure he's a loon, as is Jenny McCarthy, but AFAIK that commission has zero power. But RFK has zero scientific basis for his whacko beliefs. There is no controversy until a loon is involved. This is like having Alex Jones investigate if we landed on the moon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 So for Eric the Weird and others of his ilk, let's stipulate that Barron is Autistic. In that case, wouldn't it be a somewhat reasonable thing to try to find out what caused it and why there is such an epidemic of Autism - especially in boys in the US? RFK Jr. hasn't been given any authority other than to chair a commission to examine the issues. Sure he's a loon, as is Jenny McCarthy, but AFAIK that commission has zero power. We already know why there's an epidemic of autism. It's not vaccines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 DNC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 12, 2017 Author Share Posted February 12, 2017 DNC? Yeah... They sure need a "dustiN' cleaning" all right! ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 15, 2017 Author Share Posted February 15, 2017 http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2017/02/trump-just-broadcast-a-dangerous-falsehood-about-autism-rates.html Those who advocate for sound, evidence-based research about autism are extremely alarmed about Donald Trump, and for good reason: In addition to Trump’s ties to Andrew Wakefield, the disgraced British doctor whose debunked research helped fuel the false idea of links between childhood vaccines and autism, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a notorious anti-vaxxer himself, told reporters back in January that Trump planned to tap him as chair of a commission on “vaccine safety.” There is no question at this point that Trump has significant connections to a pseudoscientific medical movement that spreads dangerous, disproven ideas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 Run away! Run away! The psychic surgeons are upon us! Run away! Run away! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 cc: @Doc - note dates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts