Benjamin Franklin Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 Who do you think is paying for all those protestors? So they have the money to bus these people in from different states to oppose pipelines/hb2/recalls/etcs, and have operatives whose sole purpose is to patrol internet forums/chat rooms to counter "fake news", but can't accomplish voter fraud in urban polling stations run by their people? So you're with Deranged? While there may be some money in those protests, go with the simpler explanation. A bunch of unemployed SJWs can spend time anywhere without clean clothes and soap. Doesn't cost much to live on weed and Doritos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 (edited) Who do you think is paying for all those protestors? So they have the money to bus these people in from different states to oppose pipelines/hb2/recalls/etcs, and have operatives whose sole purpose is to patrol internet forums/chat rooms to counter "fake news", but can't accomplish voter fraud in urban polling stations run by their people? So you're with Deranged? If by that you mean informed, then it sounds like it. Though its existence was secret until last year, JTRIG quickly developed a distinctive profile in the public understanding, after documents from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed that the unit had engaged in “dirty tricks” like deploying sexual “honey traps” designed to discredit targets, launching denial-of-service attacks to shut down Internet chat rooms, pushing veiled propaganda onto social networks and generally warping discourse online. https://theintercept.com/2015/06/22/controversial-gchq-unit-domestic-law-enforcement-propaganda/ More: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/04/21/hillary-pac-spends-1-million-to-correct-commenters-on-reddit-and-facebook.html https://theintercept.com/2016/10/18/hillary-superpac-coordination/ https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/28972 Edited January 25, 2017 by Deranged Rhino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 Who do you think is paying for all those protestors? So they have the money to bus these people in from different states to oppose pipelines/hb2/recalls/etcs, and have operatives whose sole purpose is to patrol internet forums/chat rooms to counter "fake news", but can't accomplish voter fraud in urban polling stations run by their people? So now it is "paid protesters"... You people are delusional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 So now it is "paid protesters"... You people are delusional. For clarity (on my part), I'm not saying all the protesters, or even a high percentage of protesters, are paid. If you forced me to put a number on it it'd be under 5%. The violent elements in most protests are usually (though not always) paid by some other actor and not in any way there because they believe in the cause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 So now it is "paid protesters"... You people are delusional. These protests are professionally organized and funded. There are professional protesters in the country, who's job it is simply to protest for a fee. I've known some. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Franklin Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 These protests are professionally organized and funded. There are professional protesters in the country, who's job it is simply to protest for a fee. I've known some. Not most of the protestors. Don't fan the flames. Apparently there are operatives in our midst here at PPP. What a horrible job that would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 For clarity (on my part), I'm not saying all the protesters, or even a high percentage of protesters, are paid. If you forced me to put a number on it it'd be under 5%. The violent elements in most protests are usually (though not always) paid by some other actor and not in any way there because they believe in the cause. Interesting. Anybody have a beef with his 5% figure? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 Not most of the protestors. Don't fan the flames. Apparently there are operatives in our midst here at PPP. What a horrible job that would be. No, not most of the protesters. But it doesn't take many to set up a large protest. The women's march this past weekend was probably organized by as many as 500 people...and that's a huge number, and only because of the sheer number of different organizations that were coordinating. The traditional World Bank/IMF protests you could manage with less than 50 organizers, probably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 I always sensed that there are operatives in our ranks here... Great if we can start with a list. Tom I will make it easy on you. #1. EiL=operative idiot. #2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 I always sensed that there are operatives in our ranks here... Great if we can start with a list. Tom I will make it easy on you. #1. EiL=operative idiot. ...in bed... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 I always sensed that there are operatives in our ranks here... Great if we can start with a list. Tom I will make it easy on you. ...in bed...Could have added it there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 Oops... https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Famphtml%2Fnews%2Fpost-politics%2Fwp%2F2017%2F01%2F26%2Fit-turns-out-trump-son-in-law-jared-kushner-is-also-registered-to-vote-in-two-states%2F#pt0-847845 Just released Tweet: #TheDonOfTheDeplorables "But Ivanka didn't register in time... What's the big deal!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Franklin Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Of 3+ million illegal voters, Fox can't get one person on camera to tell their voter fraud story? This should be a huge expose with hundreds of sources. This is the hugest coverup ever. The truth is out there. We made it to Friday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Trump argument bolstered: Clinton received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, study finds by Rowan Scarborough Original Article Hillary Clinton garnered more than 800,000 votes from noncitizens on Nov. 8, an approximation far short of President Trump’s estimate of up to 5 million illegal voters but supportive of his charges of fraud. Political scientist Jesse Richman of Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, has worked with colleagues to produce groundbreaking research on noncitizen voting, and this week he posted a blog in response to Mr. Trump’s assertion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 NAACP Pledges to ‘Resist’ Trump Voter Fraud Investigation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Trump argument bolstered: Clinton received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, study finds by Rowan Scarborough Original Article Hillary Clinton garnered more than 800,000 votes from noncitizens on Nov. 8, an approximation far short of President Trump’s estimate of up to 5 million illegal voters but supportive of his charges of fraud. Political scientist Jesse Richman of Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, has worked with colleagues to produce groundbreaking research on noncitizen voting, and this week he posted a blog in response to Mr. Trump’s assertion Washington Times, what, INFOWARS was busy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg F Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 Stealing Elections—The Danger of Voter Fraudand the Fight for Election Integrity Some excerpts: It is highly likely that election results in recent years were affected by errors, inaccuracies, and outright crimes. What possible explanation can there be for the fact that in many US counties there are more registered voters than there are residents? Judicial Watch found this to be the case all across the country, including in Alabama, California, Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. Both Project Vote and ACORN have been linked to massive voter registration fraud. A total of seventy ACORN employees in twelve states have been convicted of voter registration fraud. As documented in a July 2009 report by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, of the 1.3 million registrations Project Vote/ACORN submitted in the 2008 election cycle, more than one-third were invalid. The Obama administration’s attitude toward the problem of noncitizens voting was demonstrated in Florida, when the Justice Department filed a lawsuit in 2012 to stop the state’s efforts to comply with the NVRA by removing 53,000 registered voters who were dead—as well as an additional 2,700 noncitizens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 If by that you mean informed, then it sounds like it. https://theintercept.com/2015/06/22/controversial-gchq-unit-domestic-law-enforcement-propaganda/ More: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/04/21/hillary-pac-spends-1-million-to-correct-commenters-on-reddit-and-facebook.html https://theintercept.com/2016/10/18/hillary-superpac-coordination/ https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/28972 this is almost now become automated and you can be more effective setting up the situation than doing anything else. Such as a comment I had mentioned to Buffalo Joe to troll with after trumps inauguration. To post a picture of all the US presidents than have someone else tag a bunch of feminine sites and reply that all of the presidents have been men of privilege. For clarity (on my part), I'm not saying all the protesters, or even a high percentage of protesters, are paid. If you forced me to put a number on it it'd be under 5%. The violent elements in most protests are usually (though not always) paid by some other actor and not in any way there because they believe in the cause. and many of these 5% are especially adept at creating the narrative to their desired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meathead Posted January 28, 2017 Author Share Posted January 28, 2017 Trump argument bolstered: Clinton received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, study finds by Rowan Scarborough Original Article Hillary Clinton garnered more than 800,000 votes from noncitizens on Nov. 8, an approximation far short of President Trump’s estimate of up to 5 million illegal voters but supportive of his charges of fraud. Political scientist Jesse Richman of Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, has worked with colleagues to produce groundbreaking research on noncitizen voting, and this week he posted a blog in response to Mr. Trump’s assertion can we possibly put this issue of 'non-citizen' vs 'illegal' voting to bed once and for all? any place our democracy has decided to give non-citizens the right to vote makes those votes NOT illegal. we may argue whether or not those individuals should be able to vote, i personally think they should not, but we cant call them 'illegal votes' bc they simply were not illegal this of course would be completely separate from any real voter fraud. and i still dont see how theres any way in hell we could possibly even approach 350 thousand illegal votes, let alone 3.5 million. that sounds wholly absurd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 what the !@#$ does that mean meat head? maybe they can do so for local and state elections, but not federal elections, for one. we can't call them illegal votes, it hurts too many people. lets call them workplace violent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts