Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, BillStime said:


Symbols. Symbols that represent your party.

 

As a matter of fact - your first response to my question about these horrific symbols was:

 

“I would assume he's ok with it.  Freedom is freedom right?”

 

Keep spinning Jim - do all that you can to endorse and Unite the Right. You will

not be replaced. 

 


My party?? See there is the difference. I don’t have a party.  

 

Regarding my quote?  I was busting your nuts you fool. 
 

I’m endorsing no one. I’m debating you on your ridiculous claim those two symbols are the same and you lost. And here is the great thing. You are doing EXACTLY what Tucker said. When a liberal loses a debate they never admit it. You have completely changed the subject to accuse me of defending white supremacists and Unite the Right whoever they are.  

Posted

See? More hypocrisy... It’s just a symbol right?

 

 

1 minute ago, Chef Jim said:


My party?? See there is the difference. I don’t have a party.  

 

Regarding my quote?  I was busting your nuts you fool. 
 

I’m endorsing no one. I’m debating you on your ridiculous claim those two symbols are the same and you lost. And here is the great thing. You are doing EXACTLY what Tucker said. When a liberal loses a debate they never admit it. You have completely changed the subject to accuse me of defending white supremacists and Unite the Right whoever they are.  


LMAO - sorry Jim - stop projecting. You and your friends here never acknowledge their losses because they are COWARDS.

 

As far as our debate - you missed the boat on purpose cuz you’re so afraid to be accused or associated with the UGLINESS and HATE that is the Republican Party.

 

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Number 1- don’t conflate the swastika example of something I support. If you read anything from last night you would see where I stand on both symbols.
 

Number 2 -  Where do you draw the line? The President is advocating that it’s free speech for those who want to fly the Confederate flag. I asked - what’s the difference? They’re both symbols, right? They both have several meanings, right?

 

Just look at your friends at the Unite the Right rally! They were proud wearing Confederate/Swastika scum - marching w torches and reminding us who would not replace us. 
 

Why do your friends on here refuse to acknowledge the HATE associated w BOTH of them?

 

Well, we now know why. The POTUS supports the Confederate flag - we all know it’s not because of the history behind the flag - but it symbolizes oppression, hate and white supremacy.

 

Sorry folks - you’re on the wrong side of history.

1. Well I still don't understand why you would post something you don't support as a retort to people who have never posted in support of it. 

 

2. That's the whole point. The line is when you infringe on someone else's rights. If you want to display a symbol that I find disgusting, I will let you know why I find it disgusting and try to figure out why you are choosing to display it. If you want to utilize a symbol you know is disgusting to damage someone else's reputation or livelihood, that is wrong. I suppose, if I had to sum it up shortly, I'd say I'm for freedom of expression, not freedom of attribution. You want to support or express something personally, more power to you. You want to falsely label someone else, no thank you. They are free to express it on their own if they so choose.

 

I don't speak for the other posters, which is why I went back to where I did to respond to you. I do think that a big overarching issue with a lot of what goes on politically today is that people assume other people's intentions, and they assume poorly. I'm all for Trump saying that people should be allowed to fly whatever flag they choose. I'm all for media asking him why he would support the Confederate flag. And I'd hope his response would be that he doesn't support that flag, but he does support the American flag and the freedom of expression that comes with it.

Edited by BuffaloHokie13
Posted
Just now, BuffaloHokie13 said:

1. Well I still don't understand why you would post something you don't support as a retort to people who have never posted in support of it. 

 

2. That's the whole point. The line is when you infringe on someone else's rights. If you want to display a symbol that I find disgusting, I will let you know why I find it disgusting and try to figure out why you are choosing to display it. If you want to utilize a symbol you know is disgusting to damage someone else's reputation or livelihood, that is wrong. I suppose, if I had to sum it up shortly, I'd say I'm for freedom of expression, not freedom of attribution. You want to support or express something personally, more power to you. You want to falsely label someone else, no thank you. They are free to express it on their own if they so choose.

 

I don't speak for the other posters, which is why I went back to where I did to respond to you. I do think that a big overarching issue with a lot of what goes on politically today is that people assume other people's intentions, and the assume poorly. I'm all for Trump saying that people should be allowed to fly whatever flag they choose. I'm all for media asking him why he would support the Confederate flag. And I'd hope his response would be that he doesn't support that flag, but he does support the American flag and the freedom of expression that comes with it.


Thoughtful response - thank you 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

UNEXPECTEDLY:

 

 District attorney who filed hate crime charges for painting over Black Lives Matter mural was backed by billionaire George Soros.

 

 

 

 

Earlier: “A left-wing criminal justice advocacy group with ties to George Soros is targeting nearly 500 prosecutor and sheriff elections across America in 2019 to install leftist local officials who will be soft on crime and refuse to cooperate with U.S. immigration enforcement.”

 
 
 
 
 
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

IT IS A RIDDLE WRAPPED IN A MYSTERY INSIDE AN ENIGMA; BUT PERHAPS THERE IS A KEY: 

 

Exhausted cities face another challenge: a surge in violence.

NEW YORK (AP) — Still reeling from the coronavirus pandemic and street protests over the police killing of George Floyd, exhausted cities around the nation are facing yet another challenge: a surge in shootings that has left dozens dead, including young children.

 

The spike defies easy explanation, experts say, pointing to the toxic mix of issues facing America in 2020: an unemployment rate not seen in a generation, a pandemic that has killed more than 130,000 people, stay-at-home orders, rising anger over police brutality, intense stress, even the weather.

 

 

Related:

● NYPD limits retirement applications amid 400 percent surge this week.

 

 

● New York City Proves You Don’t Have to Defund the Police, You Can Just Demoralize Them.

 

 

● Work begins on massive Black Lives Matter mural outside Trump Tower.

 

“A stretch of Fifth Avenue between East 56th and 57th streets was closed to traffic as city Department of Transportation workers began measuring and stenciling the giant yellow letters onto the pavement with spray paint and tape just after 8 a.m. The Mayor Bill de Blasio-sanctioned mural will then be painted by local artists starting at 11 a.m., with Hizzoner expected to show up later….

 

 

 

 

 

 
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

 

BLM is simply a group meant to promote far leftist groups with a brilliant name that if you say you're against them, you are inherently racist.

 

This is why we should now refer to the group as BLM and the movement, which I am all for, as Black Lives Matter.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
31 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

LIFE IN THE CRAZY YEARS:

 

 

Screen-Shot-2020-07-10-at-8.21.32-AM.png

 

 

 

I saw this on the news, some white woman was so upset and says she was offended by that sign, she was crying and wants whoever put that up fired. Please, someone tell me what's so offensive about that sign.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, B-Man said:

 

 

 

BLM is simply a group meant to promote far leftist groups with a brilliant name that if you say you're against them, you are inherently racist.

 

This is why we should now refer to the group as BLM and the movement, which I am all for, as Black Lives Matter.

 

 

 


Big "B" versus little "b."  As I said before, whoever came up with the Black Lives Matter name is a marketing genius. People cannot (will not) differentiate.
 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...