Jump to content

Terrorist Pet Peeves


Recommended Posts

 

You're a fool. This has nothing to do with terrorism or rednecks. It has everything to do with insanity and evil. Treat it as such, for God's sake. There's nothing political about this. The guy is batsh%t crazy, and should have been locked up and medicated before this ever happened. Columbine, Sandy Hook, Virginia State, Aurora - those were all mentally disturbed, sick people that needed help. But can we lock them up and medicate them? No, that is a violation of their constitutional freedom. Let them roam about, mingling with the general public, and when they go off the deep end and start blowing innocent people away, then go ahead and blame guns because it fits your pathetic, unimaginative mantra.

 

Before you start assigning a lack of intellect to 'rednecks', I'd suggest you start showing that you're actually smarter than one.

So lets explore this: anyone who a) expressed racist views, and b) professes an attachment to guns, would be a candidate for arrest and medicating. Which implicates nearly every right wing poster on this board. And given this is just a small sample, implicates millions nationally. Not to mention the inability to afford such mass arrest and treatment, you've now given the government carte blanch authority to arrest individuals on a whim, and Medicate and brainwash them...the very entity your most fearful of. I'm afraid your "remedy" is so ludicrous as to be embarrassing. Edited by JTSP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So lets explore this: anyone who a) expressed racist views, and b) professes an attachment to guns, would be a candidate for arrest and medicating. Which implicates nearly every right wing poster on this board. And given this is just a small sample, implicates millions nationally. Not to mention the inability to afford such mass arrest and treatment, you've now given the government carte blanch authority to arrest individuals on a whim, and Medicate and brainwash them...the very entity your most fearful of. I'm afraid your "remedy" is so ludicrous as to be embarrassing.

 

Umm who has expressed racist views on this forum you !@#$ing dickwad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So lets explore this: anyone who a) expressed racist views, and b) professes an attachment to guns, would be a candidate for arrest and medicating. Which implicates nearly every right wing poster on this board. And given this is just a small sample, implicates millions nationally. Not to mention the inability to afford such mass arrest and treatment, you've now given the government carte blanch authority to arrest individuals on a whim, and Medicate and brainwash them...the very entity your most fearful of. I'm afraid your "remedy" is so ludicrous as to be embarrassing.

 

What's wrong with medicating people? You should try it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So lets explore this: anyone who a) expressed racist views, and b) professes an attachment to guns, would be a candidate for arrest and medicating. Which implicates nearly every right wing poster on this board. And given this is just a small sample, implicates millions nationally. Not to mention the inability to afford such mass arrest and treatment, you've now given the government carte blanch authority to arrest individuals on a whim, and Medicate and brainwash them...the very entity your most fearful of. I'm afraid your "remedy" is so ludicrous as to be embarrassing.

 

He didn't kill those people because they were black. He killed them because he is a lunatic. He hated because he is a racist. He killed because he's a psychopath. The world is full of racists, but they don't take up arms and begin slaying people over it. Everyone here knows at least somebody who's a racist, but do any of us believe that person to be capable to walking into a church, a school, a theater, or anywhere else and just start shooting the place up, killing as many people as possible?

 

With your logic, the American south - and much of the north - would have been a constant bloodbath from 1865 to present. Explore that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So lets explore this: anyone who a) expressed racist views, and b) professes an attachment to guns, would be a candidate for arrest and medicating. Which implicates nearly every right wing poster on this board. And given this is just a small sample, implicates millions nationally. Not to mention the inability to afford such mass arrest and treatment, you've now given the government carte blanch authority to arrest individuals on a whim, and Medicate and brainwash them...the very entity your most fearful of. I'm afraid your "remedy" is so ludicrous as to be embarrassing.

You add nothing here. Why keep on trying?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

He didn't kill those people because they were black. He killed them because he is a lunatic. He hated because he is a racist. He killed because he's a psychopath. The world is full of racists, but they don't take up arms and begin slaying people over it. Everyone here knows at least somebody who's a racist, but do any of us believe that person to be capable to walking into a church, a school, a theater, or anywhere else and just start shooting the place up, killing as many people as possible?

 

With your logic, the American south - and much of the north - would have been a constant bloodbath from 1865 to present. Explore that.

No its your logic (if something so naive can be called logical) they should all be incarcerated and medicated. Edited by JTSP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMG. No, I'm not going to read the article because: Isn't this supposed to be the "smart" president? Didn't we have a looney toon kill 50+ people in Sweden...where there are no guns...and where socialism runs free....and only get 21 years in prison for it? :o Yes, in 2011, during this fool's first term in office!

 

77 people dead in far and away worse incident of "mass violence" than we've had since 9/11, with a nothing sentence? Worse, he could have mentioned that it was a right wing extremist that did the killing.

 

The man is a moron. He's nowhere near as smart or as thoughtful as has been claimed, and he proves it on a daily basis.

Before you start assigning a lack of intellect to 'rednecks', I'd suggest you start showing that you're actually smarter than one.

Why should he, when, as we see above, his favorite assclown, his own shining example of intellect, can't even remember things that happened, in his own beloved Eurotopia, during his own time in office?

 

Liberals have never once demonstrated their intellectual superiority in my lifetime. Not once. The dumbest people I have ever encountered are all on the left. Even the Bible Thumpers have been intellectually capable. Meanwhile the smartest people I meet tend to be either independents or Libertarians.

 

The entire notion that liberals know better, about anything, has been belied by:

1. Obamacare

2. Iraq

3. Budget deficit

4. Imminent, ignored, entitlement system failure

5. Solyndra

6. Cash for Clunkers(oldie but goodie)

7. Global Warming Chicken Stupid

8. Dan Rather

9. Duke Lacrosse Case, and refusing to apologize to this day/Rolling Stone Fake Rape(same, same)

10. Dodd Frank

 

I can go on, but seriously, how the F can any leftist lay claim to any sort of intellectual disparity/superiority....when we have these mind boggling acts of stupidity, put upon us by leftists who claimed the same thing?

 

Sorry, D-bags, but you don't get to talk about being smart when you've got 1-10 on your record, and there's another 10-20 that I haven't mentioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMG. No, I'm not going to read the article because: Isn't this supposed to be the "smart" president? Didn't we have a looney toon kill 50+ people in Sweden...where there are no guns...and where socialism runs free....and only get 21 years in prison for it? :o Yes, in 2011, during this fool's first term in office!

 

77 people dead in far and away worse incident of "mass violence" than we've had since 9/11, with a nothing sentence? Worse, he could have mentioned that it was a right wing extremist that did the killing.

 

The man is a moron. He's nowhere near as smart or as thoughtful as has been claimed, and he proves it on a daily basis.

Why should he, when, as we see above, his favorite assclown, his own shining example of intellect, can't even remember things that happened, in his own beloved Eurotopia, during his own time in office?

 

 

Obama is merely stating facts

 

The United States has more guns and gun deaths than any other developed country in the world, researchers found.

 

A study by two New York City cardiologists found that the U.S. has 88 guns per 100 people and 10 gun-related deaths per 100,000 people - more than any of the other 27 developed countries they studied.

 

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2013/09/19/u-s-has-more-guns-and-gun-deaths-than-any-other-country-study-finds/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama is merely stating facts

 

The United States has more guns and gun deaths than any other developed country in the world, researchers found.

 

A study by two New York City cardiologists found that the U.S. has 88 guns per 100 people and 10 gun-related deaths per 100,000 people - more than any of the other 27 developed countries they studied.

 

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2013/09/19/u-s-has-more-guns-and-gun-deaths-than-any-other-country-study-finds/

No. He stated, as I've already shown, the exact opposite of facts.

 

Sweden. 77 dead. Massively violent bomber/shooter....in a country that bans all guns. A socialist utopia. The very place Obama wants us to be. :wallbash:

 

Obama didn't talk about your study, he said WTF he said, and you are an unmitigated moron for trying to pretend that some study from 2013 == Obama's. F'ing. Quote. :wallbash:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. He stated, as I've already shown, the exact opposite of facts.

 

Sweden. 77 dead. Massively violent bomber/shooter....in a country that bans all guns. A socialist utopia. The very place Obama wants us to be. :wallbash:

 

Obama didn't talk about your study, he said WTF he said, and you are an unmitigated moron for trying to pretend that some study from 2013 == Obama's. F'ing. Quote. :wallbash:

He didn't say it doesn't happen at all, only that

 

"It doesn't happen in other places with this kind of frequency'

 

He's spot on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. He stated, as I've already shown, the exact opposite of facts.

 

Sweden. 77 dead. Massively violent bomber/shooter....in a country that bans all guns. A socialist utopia. The very place Obama wants us to be. :wallbash:

 

Obama didn't talk about your study, he said WTF he said, and you are an unmitigated moron for trying to pretend that some study from 2013 == Obama's. F'ing. Quote. :wallbash:

 

Good guy stops bad guy. No news at 6.

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/06/21/uber-bans-guns-after-driver-uses-one-to-stop-attempted-mass-shooting/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No its your logic (if something so naive can be called logical) they should all be incarcerated and medicated.

 

All violent psychopaths should be incarcerated and medicated? Yep, that's pretty much it. So your solution is to allow violent psychopaths to mingle throughout society and just take away everyone's guns so that nobody gets shot?

 

We already have a Gatorman. We don't need another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

All violent psychopaths should be incarcerated and medicated? Yep, that's pretty much it. So your solution is to allow violent psychopaths to mingle throughout society and just take away everyone's guns so that nobody gets shot?

 

We already have a Gatorman. We don't need another.

You're incredibly ignorant, its really impossible having a discussion with you. Probably won't even try after this.

 

Point is: how do you identify all these people in advance? Your assumption is that we have perfect information on who will go postal with enough time to arrest and medicated them before they actually do. Incredibly, stupidly, embaressingly, naive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're incredibly ignorant, its really impossible having a discussion with you. Probably won't even try after this.

 

Point is: how do you identify all these people in advance? Your assumption is that we have perfect information on who will go postal with enough time to arrest and medicated them before they actually do. Incredibly, stupidly, embaressingly, naive.

 

The only reason it sounds naive or ignorant is because you're mischaracterizing my point, and you're doing so on purpose. Where did I ever presume that we have "perfect information on who will go postal"? What I'm telling you is that we used to lock crazy people up and/or get them help before they could do harm to others. Not all were identified before they could cause harm, but many were. You ignore that because it doesn't fit your agenda. Instead you use tragedies such as this one to blame firearms and racism, and completely ignore the fact that all this might have been prevented had somebody seen the sickness festering inside this kid's mind. Instead, he never got treatment, and nine people paid with their lives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...