Jump to content

What is better, no guns, or more guns?


Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Pabstblueribbon said:

I suppose this is where the road ends. When forced to reconcile the fact that your solutions are untenable given the constraints set forth on the state by the highest law of the land your only remaining recourse is to undo those constraints. 

 

Stripping away more liberty from the individual via expanding and packing the supreme court with like minded ideologues who just so happen to share your view on what is "ethical". It's a very shortsighted game you're advocating for, given how quickly the winds of politics change. 

 

I guess we'll see how it all plays out!

 

Take care


Roe is laughing at you - u fn hypocrite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:


Roe is laughing at you - u fn hypocrite.

 

1. I never expressed an opinion on abortion, as this is not the topic of discussion here. 

 

2. Filling vacancies in the Supreme Court as they present themselves is different than unilaterally expanding the number of SCOTUS seats and simultaneously appointing new judges to fill them. 

 

3. As it pertains to the topic at hand, Your feigned concern over the rights of women is laughable as you advocate for stripping them of the best force multiplier they have when confronted with a larger, stronger attacker who would otherwise overpower them with ease. This is even more troubling if I reject your world of make believe where criminal rapists, muggers, and home invaders all willingly submit to your pie in the sky solution and turn in their guns. 

 

 

 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Pabstblueribbon said:

 

1. I never expressed an opinion on abortion, as this is not the topic of discussion here. 

 

2. Filling vacancies in the Supreme Court as they present themselves is different than unilaterally expanding the number of SCOTUS seats and simultaneously appointing new judges to fill them. 

 

3. As it pertains to the topic at hand, Your feigned concern over the rights of women is laughable as you advocate for stripping them of the best force multiplier they have when confronted with a larger, stronger attacker who would otherwise overpower them with ease. This is even more troubling if I reject your world of make believe where criminal rapists, muggers, and home invaders all willingly submit to your pie in the sky solution and turn in their guns. 

 

 

 


1) Don’t matter - you freaks are programmed the same.

 

2) Trump McConnell packed the court.

 

3) Roe is still laughing at you. Stop embarrassing yourself.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, BillStime said:

The truth hurts these MAGA gun nutters - that’s why they are so defensive and desperate to blame everyone but their votes

 

I was actually prepared to let you have the last word, misinformed and condescending as it may be.. but then you had to come back and pathetically double post to try and get yet another shot in. 

 

You add nothing to this discussion. You are effectively a Twitter repost bot devoid of any ability to comprehend nuance let alone digest opinions expressed in long form. When cornered you deflect to tangential arguments for which you have no basis of fact. You are the quintessential holier than thou clairvoyant leftist who believes that they know what's best despite their obvious high-school level education.

 

"Roe is laughing". No, Roe is dead. Just like your disgusting ideology. The bodies of the victims have not yet cooled and you turkey vultures are already circling the carcass attempting to leverage the tragedy to foist your delusions of a grand utopia in which all we need are more laws and more concessions and more restrictions placed on the American people who had no part in this. I've seen the evolution of your kind. Fat slovenly totalitarians who are too stupid to win on the merits of the argument so you disingenuously flail around reposting other people's quips like youre some kind of sociological expert when you're clearly too stupid to even type out more than 3 sentences before copy/paste syndrome kicks in. 

 

You're a joke and a disgrace to actual "liberals", who once championed themselves as being fighters for civil liberty rather than pigs in a pen wallowing away on the slop that is fed to them by their almighty government. 

 

You should have quit while you were ahead. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Pabstblueribbon
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Pabstblueribbon said:

 

I was actually prepared to let you have the last word, misinformed and condescending as it may be.. but then you had to come back and pathetically double post to try and get yet another shot in. 

 

You add nothing to this discussion. You are effectively a Twitter repost bot devoid of any ability to comprehend nuance let alone digest opinions expressed in long form. When cornered you deflect to tangential arguments for which you have no basis of fact. You are the quintessential holier than thou clairvoyant leftist who believes that they know what's best despite their obvious high-school level education.

 

"Roe is laughing". No, Roe is dead. Just like your disgusting ideology. The bodies of the victims have not yet cooled and you turkey vultures are already circling the carcass attempting to leverage the tragedy to foist your delusions of a grand utopia in which all we need are more laws and more concessions and more restrictions placed on the American people who had no part in this. I've seen the evolution of your kind. Fat slovenly totalitarians who are too stupid to win on the merits of the argument so you disingenuously flail around reposting other people's quips like youre some kind of sociological expert when you're clearly too stupid to even type out more than 3 sentences before copy/paste syndrome kicks in. 

 

You're a joke and a disgrace to actual "liberals", who once championed themselves as being fighters for civil liberty rather than pigs in a pen wallowing away on the slop that is fed to them by their almighty government. 

 

You should have quit while you were ahead. 

 

 

 

 


Oh. She’s back.

 

Remember this day?

 

giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d7pudl8omcfibbo1i5m5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pabstblueribbon said:

 

1. I never expressed an opinion on abortion, as this is not the topic of discussion here. 

 

2. Filling vacancies in the Supreme Court as they present themselves is different than unilaterally expanding the number of SCOTUS seats and simultaneously appointing new judges to fill them. 

 

3. As it pertains to the topic at hand, Your feigned concern over the rights of women is laughable as you advocate for stripping them of the best force multiplier they have when confronted with a larger, stronger attacker who would otherwise overpower them with ease. This is even more troubling if I reject your world of make believe where criminal rapists, muggers, and home invaders all willingly submit to your pie in the sky solution and turn in their guns. 

 

 

 

I see you are new here and I am warning you that expecting an intelligent response from his the definition of insanity. I often view he is a conservative that is simply taking a schtick of liberalism to an absurd degree, the rest of the time I think he is simply not that bright.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...