Jump to content

What is better, no guns, or more guns?


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

So the whole "the goal is not to take guns from legal citizens" was BS.

 

the goal is to disarm by any means, even if criminalizing and force.

 

From the same folks screaming "Defund Police" for the last few years.

 

You're replying to a chain of replies about banning AR-15s WTF are you talking about?

 

How would the goal not be to remove them? I suppose technically you can write a law in such a way as to grandfather in previous ownership but when the previous comment is as vague as "ban them" I don't really get into that detail.

 

Also there are a lot of different ways to enforce a ban beside peoples paranoid posse of a roving federal band going around and taking peoples guns. They can use buy-back programs, they can institute fines, they can enforce it as they see it, and obviously they'd ask people to turn them in, but yes also they could take more extreme measures.

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

You're replying to a chain of replies about banning AR-15s WTF are you talking about?

 

How would the goal not be to remove them? I suppose technically you can write a law in such a way as to grandfather in previous ownership but when the previous comment is as vague as "ban them" I don't really get into that detail.

 

Also there are a lot of different ways to enforce a ban beside peoples paranoid posse of a roving federal band going around and taking peoples guns. They can use buy-back programs, they can institute fines, they can enforce it as they see it, and obviously they'd ask people to turn them in, but yes also they could take more extreme measures.


 

Why ban the AR 15? 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

You're replying to a chain of replies about banning AR-15s WTF are you talking about?

 

How would the goal not be to remove them? I suppose technically you can write a law in such a way as to grandfather in previous ownership but when the previous comment is as vague as "ban them" I don't really get into that detail.

 

Also there are a lot of different ways to enforce a ban beside peoples paranoid posse of a roving federal band going around and taking peoples guns. They can use buy-back programs, they can institute fines, they can enforce it as they see it, and obviously they'd ask people to turn them in, but yes also they could take more extreme measures.

Lets get the state (aggression) against citizens.  

 

you started with a rant about some roving police force, implying it was a conspiracy. then ended it with escalation to what?

 

 

 

While the majority of gun crime and mass shootings are in your strongholds. and banning AR-15 would have absolutely no impact on that.

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

Lets get the state (aggression) against citizens.  

 

you started with a rant about some roving police force, implying it was a conspiracy. then ended it with escalation to what?

 

 

 

While the majority of gun crime and mass shootings are in your strongholds. and banning AR-15 would have absolutely no impact on that.

 

 

The point was people are paranoid that the government will do that, but first they'd have to actually vote to do it, I'll believe it when I see it, second they'd have to decide to try and enforce it as stupidly as possible, I brought it up at the end because they do have the authority to do more extreme measures because we give them that. Far more likely is a more gradual approach which would probably inevitably result in lawsuits that'll find their way up to the Supreme Court.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said:

Yep if you live in the country you just need some land and a tractor to make a berm! Also as already mentioned, who is going to enforce the ban? Local sheriff's won't. And you are going to find where they are buried on Ryno's 30 acres? Is the FBI going to metal detect everyone's property? This is nonsense.

 

Keep threatening to ban and increasing sales in the meantime. Seems counterproductive to me.

Do you think, just maybe, that federal law enforcement has eyes and ears within hate group militias and their training areas.  cuz if they don't, they're negligent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Yes, we must forget about the Bolsheviks in red states taking away rights from people.

 

We should just ignore it... pretend it doesn't exist.

 

Fun bubble you live in precious.

 

 


Bolsheviks push porn and sex shows on kid. Nazis ban them. Get it straight. 

  • Disagree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

The point was people are paranoid that the government will do that, but first they'd have to actually vote to do it, I'll believe it when I see it, second they'd have to decide to try and enforce it as stupidly as possible, I brought it up at the end because they do have the authority to do more extreme measures because we give them that. Far more likely is a more gradual approach which would probably inevitably result in lawsuits that'll find their way up to the Supreme Court.

NYS tried to ban Assault rifles. Same process. like 10 people registered.  Lots of folks said they had boating accidents.

 

Here is one. How would the government know where they are?

Just now, Commsvet11 said:



Don’t get mad at me for making you look stupid get mad at you.

Answer the basic question.

 

What lives will be saved by banning the AR-15? 
 

 

its not going to answer. its not mad.  makes ignorant statements then insults anyone that replies.

 

 

 

it always tosses ad hominem insults at the end.  ALWAYS.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, redtail hawk said:

Do you think, just maybe, that federal law enforcement has eyes and ears within hate group militias and their training areas.  cuz if they don't, they're negligent.

What hate group is in my backyard? I shoot from my deck. How would they know if that's an AR or a bolt action 308?

 

The point is they will never be able to ban AR's without also banning other semi auto guns which also could not happen because nobody would comply

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KDIGGZ said:

What hate group is in my backyard? I shoot from my deck. How would they know if that's an AR or a bolt action 308?

 

The point is they will never be able to ban AR's without also banning other semi auto guns which also could not happen because nobody would comply

will you take part in a civil war with your AR?  A school shooting?  If not, then no one really cares except maybe your neighbors.  What's the range of the AR rounds you use.  Anyone ever found one in a wall cuz I know people that have.

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

NYS tried to ban Assault rifles. Same process. like 10 people registered.  Lots of folks said they had boating accidents.

 

Here is one. How would the government know where they are?

Right, I think AR sales went UP after they were banned in NY lol. You can buy the lower and build your own and nobody knows and sheriff's don't care

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LeviF said:


Bolsheviks push porn and sex shows on kid. Nazis ban them. Get it straight. 

the sad thing is, I'll bet you truly believe this.

2 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said:

Right, I think AR sales went UP after they were banned in NY lol. You can buy the lower and build your own and nobody knows and sheriff's don't care

So you speak for all sheriffs.  Playing golf this weekend with 2 state troopers.  I'll ask if they agree.  most I've talked to about don't like the idea that their weapons might be overmatched.

And what is the range of your AR rounds?

 

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Do you think, just maybe, that federal law enforcement has eyes and ears within hate group militias and their training areas.  cuz if they don't, they're negligent.

There is no comprehensive national system of gun registration. In fact, federal law prohibits the use of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) to create any system of registration of firearms or firearm owners

 

If they do they are actively infringing on rights of citizens.   (Hate groups) The militia in this area has a lot of cops and ex cops in it. they are not included in any ban and don't support them. and a militia is not illegal or a bad thing.

 

your kind of showing that fascist bone, just saying

 

State spying on legal citizens and your supporting it.  

 

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...