....lybob Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 female sperm (xy) are heavier then male cattle sperm (XX) because they have more chromosomes. They are also chewier, IMO. To sex the semen they pass it thru a straw with a charge. Females are attracted to one side. Male another. Sperm not able to be charged are discarded and usually about 10% or less of the total collection. The semen can also be cloned, as is being done in the dairy world. for any kids out there, Female = XX and male = XY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 for any kids out there, Female = XX and male = XY Did you ever consider that maybe JB didn't want to admit that he preferred male sperm to female sperm and made up the whole thing about chewability? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Bravo to the spirited battle going on between KTF and Levi. This could go on for awhile before a winner is proclaimed. Is this too early to talk about different contestants sex changes? Should it even matter? I'm truly troubled by this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I'm truly troubled by this. I'm truly troubled with the concept of 'chewy cattle sperm'. E-I-E-I-Oh yeah, baby..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 for any kids out there, Female = XX and male = XY I was curious if anyone would notice the switch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I was curious if anyone would notice the switch. Just wait until you get assigned to debate Crocofschitboy and have to defend male cow chewiness against female cow suckiness. You won't be happy if you get licked in this contest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted October 8, 2013 Author Share Posted October 8, 2013 WOW. Nice work LeviF91. You came thisclose to putting away a victory. Your only mistake was doubling down on your opponents failed strategy of moving teams to small markets. Columbus? Really? Columbus at Harrisburg sounds like a ratings bonanza. Your defense of the name Levi was just ok and in the next paragraph you sounded like you were changing your own name. It took too long to mention Snyder. Other than these small imperfections you may have sealed the match. keepthefaith better have a real strong reply or this is over. Also, you don't have to wait your turn. Put him away now if you think that is a good strategy. Since Birdog wrongly hinted that I might actually be DCTom I've been just seething. That aside, go back and read Keepthefaith's response to levi and you'll see he addressed your suggestion. Do you have any reading comprehension whatsoever you idiot and !@#$ing moron? It seems weird for you to criticize Chickendog1960 when your name should be Chickennlong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 WOW. Nice work LeviF91. You came thisclose to putting away a victory. Your only mistake was doubling down on your opponents failed strategy of moving teams to small markets. Columbus? Really? Columbus at Harrisburg sounds like a ratings bonanza. Your defense of the name Levi was just ok and in the next paragraph you sounded like you were changing your own name. It took too long to mention Snyder. Other than these small imperfections you may have sealed the match. keepthefaith better have a real strong reply or this is over. Also, you don't have to wait your turn. Put him away now if you think that is a good strategy. It seems weird for you to criticize Chickendog1960 when your name should be Chickennlong. I tend to follow the old Confucius proverb: "Do not smite your foe when all he has is a dagger and you are blessed with a sword." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I tend to follow the old Confucius proverb: "Do not smite your foe when all he has is a dagger and you are blessed with a sword." You remind me more of the guy that shows up at the gun fight with a knife... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 You remind me more of the guy that shows up at the gun fight with a knife... Just go away. You don't even have the balls to answer a follow-up question to your outlandish statement. Why are you so afraid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Just go away. You don't even have the balls to answer a follow-up question to your outlandish statement. Why are you so afraid? Because you are so smart, it intimidates me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted October 8, 2013 Author Share Posted October 8, 2013 Approaching pwnage. And keepthefaith left Mark Rypien out of his argument. Time for a Hail Mary pass keepthefaith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICanSleepWhenI'mDead Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 You remind me more of the guy that shows up at the gun fight with a knife... http://www.skyvalleychronicle.com/FEATURE-NEWS/STORE-CLERK-FIGHTS-OFF-ARMED-ROBBER-WITH-MACHETE-br-Lives-to-tell-the-tale-1500756 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDO9tVU078o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 (edited) Since Birdog wrongly hinted that I might actually be DCTom I've been just seething. That aside, go back and read Keepthefaith's response to levi and you'll see he addressed your suggestion. Do you have any reading comprehension whatsoever you idiot and !@#$ing moron? didn't hint at anything. i reported the results of a search. have you tried it? why would that occur? more to the point, it would never occur to me to post under multiple usernames and i'm not stating that you are. but if someone was doing that, what would be the point? that would be like cheating in a charity golf tournament (which i've witnessed many times - the ability to buy mulligans makes naming a winner almost as pointless as this showdown)). not only would it be stupid and unsatisfying but also embarrassing. Edited October 8, 2013 by birdog1960 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 didn't hint at anything. i reported the results of a search. have you tried it? why would that occur? more to the point, it would never occur to me to post under multiple usernames and i'm not stating that you are. but if someone was doing that, what would be the point? that would be like cheating in a charity golf tournament (which i've witnessed many times - the ability to buy mulligans makes naming a winner almost as pointless as this showdown)). not only would it be stupid and unsatisfying but also embarrassing. Too cheap to buy a mulligan for charity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 didn't hint at anything. i reported the results of a search. have you tried it? why would that occur? more to the point, it would never occur to me to post under multiple usernames and i'm not stating that you are. but if someone was doing that, what would be the point? that would be like cheating in a charity golf tournament (which i've witnessed many times - the ability to buy mulligans makes naming a winner almost as pointless as this showdown)). not only would it be stupid and unsatisfying but also embarrassing. You really don't get sarcasm and humor, do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 that would be like cheating in a charity golf tournament (which i've witnessed many times - the ability to buy mulligans makes naming a winner almost as pointless as this showdown)). not only would it be stupid and unsatisfying but also embarrassing. I think someone missed the point of a charity golf tournament. Too cheap to buy a mulligan for charity? The top 1% should be forced to buy mulligans for everybody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I think someone missed the point of a charity golf tournament. Kind of sad & ironic at the same time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 http://www.skyvalley...he-tale-1500756 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDO9tVU078o We saw this on the news this morning as a teaser. They said stay tuned to see what the store clerk pulls out that scares the robber away. I looked at my wife and said "a job application??" Kind of sad & ironic at the same time. No not really. The left doesn't get voluntary charity. They prefer their charity at the point of a tax return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Kind of sad & ironic at the same time. not at all. charge more for the entry fee and have a real tourney without mulligans or throws. or even better, donate money without needing to incur the expense of a golf tournament and play golf with your friends on your own. but don't gloat over a trophy won when somebody in your group uses a "throw" as a 2 yard step towards the hole with a drop in for a net hole in 1 on a par 3. i think it's a symptom of the inherent dishonesty in our society. perhaps you find winning this way satisfying. i don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts