Get on the record about Cam.

[Bangarang]

I want a QB, not an athlete.

[truth on hold]

in BCS i can see the physical tools, but also looks a year or two away from being an NFL starter. i dont want to pay a guy $10MM/yr to sit on the bench for 2 years. At #3 i want to draft a guy that can play now. If by some miracle hes there at #35 then consider it. but not #3. give me a defensive front 7 that can start and be a factor day 1

[Trader]

I want a QB, not an athlete.

 

I will go on the record. Newton is a top 5 pick or a top ten pick. It will depend on the Combine, interviews and perhaps any new information that is revealed about his character. If I were the Bills brain trust and the Combine results were solid I would take him at 3 or trade him to a team that wants him for additional picks. He would not come cheap.

[Dawgg]

I will go on the record. Newton is a top 5 pick or a top ten pick. It will depend on the Combine, interviews and perhaps any new information that is revealed about his character. If I were the Bills brain trust and the Combine results were solid I would take him at 3 or trade him to a team that wants him for additional picks. He would not come cheap.

I'd take him at 3.

I think he has the raw talent and moxie to succeed at this level, provided he checks out at the combine and doesn't have mental hangups that we are unaware of.

[Big Turk]

Lot's of posters here. Can't read every topic. Some posters are more vocal than others. Here is the Cam poll. Vote for how you feel about Cam for the Bills. This isn't anything about Cam personally or in college. This is about the draft and future of the Bills.

 

This poll is public. Everyone will see how you voted. Click the "view" button next to the results in the poll to see who voted how if you are interested.

 

Obviously feel free to post in here further thoughts on why or whatever you feel the way you do...if nothing else that can keep it quasi-bumped just to get solid poll results.

 

really doesn't matter what we think...either he is gonna be good or he is gonna suck. Not even the best scouts are gonna know until he starts taking snaps in the NFL...even then half of the scouts will disagree with the other half...

Edited January 12, 2011 by matter2003

[reddogblitz]

I voted no, don't want him. We already have a pretty good QB. We can pick up a good experienced sub in FA.

 

I don't want to draft another project that may or may not materialize with that high of a pick. If he fell to the second round, maybe. He's a college QB. Like Tebow or Don McPherson. Great in college, but his style just won't translate that well into the NFL unless he learns to be a pocket passer. Do you think he's a good enough passer (forget running) to pull that off? I don't. Passing is what matters in the NFL, not running.

[dubj04]

There is no way he last past the first round so getting him later is out of the question. As far as him being NFL ready, how many guys are at the beginning of their careers. I know there are a few exceptions to the rule, but for every name you throw out there is a ton of Hall of Fame QB's that were not. I think that this will be one of those picks that everyone who needs a qb that passes on him will regret it. Also, I think this whole character thing is BS. If a player produces all of those issues seem to go out of the window. For example, you think Dallas or the Hall of Fame voters care about M. Irvings issues. Hey, technically the Bible says premarital sex is wrong so should we run all the single guys that are getting some out of town. I WANT GUYS WHO CAN PLAY FOOTBALL!

Edited January 12, 2011 by dubj04

[ReturnoftheBuffaloBeast23]

I want a QB, not an athlete.

 

LMAO Thats Hilarious... Fitz is an athlete and you want him right? I think you may have ment you don't want a mobile QB or maybe you were takin it to another level cuz there are many different racial undertones on this board about Cam. So who knows? Maybe im wrong, Maybe im right.

 

I'd take Cam if Fairly or Bowers are gone which im 90 percent sure they're going to be. I know everybody has there own opinion but if you think Fitz is better than Cam I think you may have the Flu or a Fever cuz your sick....

[dubj04]

LMAO Thats Hilarious... Fitz is an athlete and you want him right? I think you may have ment you don't want a mobile QB or maybe you were takin it to another level cuz there are many different racial undertones on this board about Cam. So who knows? Maybe im wrong, Maybe im right.

 

I'd take Cam if Fairly or Bowers are gone which im 90 percent sure they're going to be. I know everybody has there own opinion but if you think Fitz is better than Cam I think you may have the Flu or a Fever cuz your sick....

Agreed

[truth on hold]

Rumor is that Eagles are looking to trade Kolb for a 1st rounder. Doubt they get it, so best they can get is high 2nd rounder from someone like us.

 

so whats better: newton + best defender at #35, or kolb + best defender with 3rd pick

[Dawgg]

Rumor is that Eagles are looking to trade Kolb for a 1st rounder. Doubt they get it, so best they can get is high 2nd rounder from someone like us.

 

so whats better: newton + best defender at #35, or kolb + best defender with 3rd pick

If Newton checks out at the combine and visits (i.e. no skeletons in his closet, meshes well with coaches), I'd take Newton. I think Chan can figure out ways to utilize his ability.

 

Draft Newton

Use the remainder of the draft to take the best players at any position except WR and RB. Yes, we could use secondary depth with McGee getting old and Florence a free agent.

[Captain Hindsight]

wasnt really impressed with him last night...ill pass

[sllib olaffub]

I could be wrong - but, he looks like the kind of player a team would have to build the offense around, cater to, and even then, I can't say he's shown enough skill as is to be successful at the NFL level. Sure, with the right coach, the right offense, he might be great. So, unless Gailey looks at him and says, "he's perfect for what I envision", then I'd say pass, get the great D-lineman, and if you like that kind of guy, go get Vince Young.

 

However - with Gailey's track record, we should be excited about whoever they do end up picking as the eventual franchise QB. I don't know - I'll have to look it up - if Gailey has ever had the chance to hand pick his QB? Whoever we end up with at the QB position, I think we can expect good things. I mean, look how decent Fitzpatrick was this year. Gailey didn't see a whole lot in him until the time came for Fitz to play. Imagine what he can do with a guy he is excited about.

[Orton's Arm]

I think he's likely to bust, doesn't show big potential to be a prototype NFL passer, and has poor character. But as a second round pick he's like a lottery ticket when the powerball is high, worth the risk.

I agree with your first sentence more than your second. If you want to use a second round pick on a somewhat risky quarterback, why not go after a guy who's known more for being a pocket passer than for being athletic?

 

Very few franchise QBs get drafted after the first round. Of the good, non-first round QBs still in the league, the ones that come to mind are Drew Brees, Tom Brady, and Matt Schaub. (Maybe there are one or two others I'm forgetting.) None of those guys are particularly mobile or athletic. The fact these players were drafted at all was because of what they'd shown as pocket passers, not because of their athletic gifts.

 

Obviously, very few quarterbacks taken outside the first round reach the level of Brady or Brees--or even Schaub for that matter. But if you feel like using a non-first rounder on a quarterback to give yourself at least a chance of getting one of those success stories, why not go after a pocket passer QB rather than an "athletic gifts QB"? Christian Ponder might still be around when the Bills' second round pick comes up. He's a guy who's shown good accuracy in the pocket; as well as the other traits you'd hope to see from a pocket passing QB. While any QB taken outside the first round is a lot more likely to turn into a career backup than into a franchise QB, Ponder has as good a chance as any non-first rounder to become the next Drew Brees story.

[Hplarrm]

I want a QB, not an athlete.

Yet. I think the options presented in the poll actually gives you the opportunity to both things and have both the QB and the athlete by trading down into the middle of the first and getting Newton.

 

When the smoke clears the positioning for the Bills is:

 

1. You trade the valuable #3 using the draft value charts to get a 10-15 choice (whereever you judge Newton will drop to as it is quite doubtful he is a good to go starter at QB in his first year).

 

However, though Newton is not likely to be a quality QB right out of the draft (he has not shown the made to start at QB that Luck has shown but then nobody has). Newton is a good passer and a nimble runner who is able to make good reads against college opponents. However, against the bigger and consistently faster pro players Newton appears to need a year or more watching pro Ds up close and personal before he becomes quality starter he might well be.

 

2. Even though you traded down to get Newton he still can play a valuable role in the Bills O as:

 

A. We make more use of the Wildcat O with Newton as the QB primarily used as a runner receiving the direct snap.

B. The Jets showed how one can use a talented athlete who can pass but is primarily a runner in the Wildcat.

C, Newton appears to be a good enough athlete that when he is in the game he not only provides the possibility of traditional QB or use as an RB but potentially provides a credible WR threat.

 

3. Firzgerald is actually our designated QB and its his job to hold for at least a year. This gives Newton time tp develop. However by trading down for a significant pick we get potential D supplements with our #2 pick in the second round and the supplemental pick we get for trading down.

 

I can see how this can work well to make us potent next year.

[bluecarter]

Cam Newton has a Bad News written all over him. I think he'll hold out long into the preseason, and he seems more of a Arron Maybin. No one heard of him beginning of this year, and now he's the MAN. I'm not a fan of one year wonders, and think will all the news following him it doesn't seem he had nothing to do with it.

[Dorkington]

I'll take him with a later pick, but not at the current #3 spot.

 

So if we trade down for more picks, yes. If he happens to be there in the second, yes. At #3, no.

[MDH]

If I'm spending a top 5 pick on a QB - or any first rounder for that matter - I at least expect him to know the basic: Like knowing how to do a proper 3,5 & 7 step drop.

 

Dropping back like Newton does - with no discipline - then looking to take off the moment he thinks he sees a hole has proven time and time again to not work in the NFL. Even successful mobile QBs understand proper footwork and I've not seen many QBs who didn't have this basic fundamental down by the end of college who found success in the NFL. It shows a lack of work ethic to perfect his craft and that will translate to failure in the NFL.

 

To me this is akin to a RB who is successful in college because he's more athletic than everybody else and hits the edge time and time again - like say, Reggie Bush. Sure it works in college but once you play with the big boys its a different story.

 

Add to it that Newton doesn't play in a pro style offense and his learning curve is even higher. He doesn't have basic fundamentals AND he isn't very familiar with the pro set. He's a project who will take years to bear fruit - if he bears fruit at all which I doubt given the fact that he's going to be forced into the lineup before he's ready (due to his name) and when he fails he'll be thrown to the scrap heap.

 

The guy has all the signs of being a bust but that won't stop someone from drafting him in the 1st round.

[8-8 Forever?]

I voted for grab him if he falls to us in the 2nd, but I would also be ok with it if we traded back and loaded up on draft picks and took him later in the first. I am not sold on him, in fact, the only reason I find him even intriguing is because of Chans track record with QB's, especially mobile QB's.

a vote for 2nd round is a no vote for chickens. he will not be avail in the 2nd.

[Pine Barrens Mafia]

Nein!