Pete Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 Is this the USA or is this Dubai? WTF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dib Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 both were charged with public lewdness The adultery charge on her was on top of this. so she was on top? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 so she was on top? Apparently the dude didn't know she was married. So ignorance is OK for marital status but not age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted June 9, 2010 Author Share Posted June 9, 2010 That's why it smells so fishy to me (no pun intended). It's an excessive charge, an outdated charge, that smacks of the officer wanting to either make an example of this chick or excessively punish her (again, no pun intended). You could be right. My first reaction was that he was pissed that they were doing this in front of kids, so he threw any charge that he could think of at them.........But, since he did know her from previous incidences, it sure could be more to the story. And, maybe he had previous incidences with her while not in uniform. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted June 9, 2010 Author Share Posted June 9, 2010 This story is now on page one of aol.com..........And her husband has already forgiven her!: http://www.aolnews.com/crime/article/new-y...ryst%2F19508603 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 Sounds like Sharia- not the "land of the free" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 what the cops are failing to realize is that this was actually a THREESOME with the picnic table!! also: would! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 You could be right. My first reaction was that he was pissed that they were doing this in front of kids, so he threw any charge that he could think of at them.........But, since he did know her from previous incidences, it sure could be more to the story. And, maybe he had previous incidences with her while not in uniform. He wanted her publically humiliated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 He wanted her publically humiliated. Absolutely. My question is why ... It's my writer's brain having fun with the possibilities. Maybe Crayonz knows! I'm sure he could come up with an interesting scenario. Or he'd just blame Googlebot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guffalo Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 This story is now on page one of aol.com..........And her husband has already forgiven her!:http://www.aolnews.com/crime/article/new-y...ryst%2F19508603 Thank goodness we have a happy ending to the story, the husband has forgiven her and life goes on How sweet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted June 9, 2010 Author Share Posted June 9, 2010 Thank goodness we have a happy ending to the story, the husband has forgiven her and life goes on How sweet! In a related matter, I just told my secretary I'm taking the rest of the day off and will be in Batavia.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 Sounds like Sharia- not the "land of the free" settle down sparky. she's charged with a misdemeanor, i don't think Batavia allows public whippings unless it's a felony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cornerville Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 They were probably charged because the cop wanted a piece of her 1st Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 I don't see why people have a problem with her getting charged with adultery. After all, marriage is a legal union which stipulates both partners being faithful. I don't think that infidelity should go without legal consequences (though adultery is rarely so easy to prove as this). EDIT: In Michigan, they can put you away for life. http://web.archive.org/web/20070206173058/...COL04/701150333 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 I don't see why people have a problem with her getting charged with adultery. After all, marriage is a legal union which stipulates both partners being faithful. I don't think that infidelity should go without legal consequences (though adultery is rarely so easy to prove as this). For several reasons: First, it's an excessive charge. The fact that she was arrested for having sex in public is proof enough for her husband if he decides to divorce her and wanted to prove infidelity. Second, it's such an out-dated crime (by proof of how sparingly it's been used over the last 40 years). Is it illegal? Yes. Is it immoral? Certainly. But is it really something we want the authorities to police for us? It's a slippery slope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 settle down sparky. she's charged with a misdemeanor, i don't think Batavia allows public whippings unless it's a felony So you support a big brother state where the police can arrest you for infidelity? I don't give a **** if its a misdemeanor or a verbal warning- it is none of the police's !@#$ing business what you do with your personal life! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 So you support a big brother state where the police can arrest you for infidelity? I don't give a **** if its a misdemeanor or a verbal warning- it is none of the police's !@#$ing business what you do with your personal life! Well, let's see. The police enforce the law, and adultery is against the law in New York State...soooo it seems like it IS the police's business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkady Renko Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 How is an adultery charge any more intrusive on liberties than a solicitation or other prostitution charge? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 So you support a big brother state where the police can arrest you for infidelity? I don't give a **** if its a misdemeanor or a verbal warning- it is none of the police's !@#$ing business what you do with your personal life! there's nothing personal about a public park Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typical TBD Guy Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 I don't see why people have a problem with her getting charged with adultery. After all, marriage is a legal union which stipulates both partners being faithful. I don't think that infidelity should go without legal consequences (though adultery is rarely so easy to prove as this). EDIT: In Michigan, they can put you away for life. http://web.archive.org/web/20070206173058/...COL04/701150333 And therein lies the problem. As long as we let the government continue to have a say on such personal matters as marriage, we shouldn't be too surprised when they enforce BS archaic laws like adultery. But to get back on topic so this doesn't go to PPP, yes she's a hot cougar and yes I'd do her on a picnic table. But definitely not in public, and definitely not without a condom or two or three. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts