bills_red Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 http://twitter.com/MrMichael_Smith/status/12646167926 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickelCity Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Yes, and I'd take Cody most likely. However, their offer would have to be pretty juicy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan72 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Yes, for a good price...include draft pick(s) next year too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Gun10 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 If we move to 24 im sorry but hello Tebow, and i hate it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_red Posted April 22, 2010 Author Share Posted April 22, 2010 If we move to 24 im sorry but hello Tebow, and i hate it Well move up from R2 into 1st to draft Tebow or move down and pick him? I'd take the later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mis3384 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Yes I would move down and we need to aquire more picks. I WOULD NOT DRAFT CODY, he has attitude problems and weight management issues. I WOULD NOT DRAFT TEBOW, because hes not a 1st RD value and NOT A GOOD QB I would draft DT -Price from UCLA, and then get a OT and WR in the 2nd RD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemhoff Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Well move up from R2 into 1st to draft Tebow or move down and pick him? I'd take the later. I agree, moving back with compensation is a more appealing scenario than trading away needed draft picks. I love the idea that we could pick up a few more draft picks this year. The Bills have so many holes to fill and this draft is perceived to be deep with talent, seems like the right move, although not splashy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_red Posted April 22, 2010 Author Share Posted April 22, 2010 Yes I would move down and we need to aquire more picks. I WOULD NOT DRAFT CODY, he has attitude problems and weight management issues. I WOULD NOT DRAFT TEBOW, because hes not a 1st RD value and NOT A GOOD QB I would draft DT -Price from UCLA, and then get a OT and WR in the 2nd RD Why draft a 43 UT? Don't think he has the skill set to be a 34 end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mob16151 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I'd draft Cody at 24. Just stand there guy, and let the rest of the front 7 flow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeSpeed Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 http://twitter.com/MrMichael_Smith/status/12646167926 ? Yes! Roger Saffold would be OK there. Clausen might even make it this far down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKRAAPY Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Yes I would move down and we need to aquire more picks. I WOULD NOT DRAFT CODY, he has attitude problems and weight management issues. I WOULD NOT DRAFT TEBOW, because hes not a 1st RD value and NOT A GOOD QB I would draft DT -Price from UCLA, and then get a OT and WR in the 2nd RD http://www.tidefans.com/forums/football/10...rence-cody.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffOrange Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Way up means higher than 9. They want Eric Berry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I WOULD NOT DRAFT CODY, he has attitude problems and weight management issues. care to elaborate on the attitude problems? ive never heard of those. from what ive heard is that hes a great kid with a hard upbringing. that if he fails it wont be from lack of effort or not caring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_red Posted April 22, 2010 Author Share Posted April 22, 2010 Way up means higher than 9. They want Eric Berry. 24 to 9 is 15 picks. I'd call that way up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertpaul49 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I think a more likely trade would be with the Giants so they can get McClain. They released their starting inside linebacker, and there really isn't anyone else at ILB. However, it all depends on what the Eagles are willing to give up. What about a starting Left Tackle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffOrange Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 24 to 9 is 15 picks. I'd call that way up. Be that as it may, I don't think they're interested in our pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 This has been done to death, but Philly isn't trading up to get Berry unless he falls to us or later. And he won't. They might trade up for Earl Thomas, but they won't have to go higher than Miami to do it. The Giants realize the depth at ILB in the draft and won't reach to trade the farm for McClain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
playman Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 they are if the player they want is still there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 So say we get their 37th pick and their 105th pick. Slightly in our favor point wise. Would ya? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACor58 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I would swap picks and ask for Jason Peters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteBills4ever Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Seattle has 2 first round pick, 6 and 14, they could trade 6 to Philly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribo Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I think a more likely trade would be with the Giants so they can get McClain. They released their starting inside linebacker, and there really isn't anyone else at ILB. However, it all depends on what the Eagles are willing to give up. What about a starting Left Tackle? Coughlin is too smart to let that happen. I'm all for taking Philly's #24, #37 and #121, still getting a Jimmy Clausen, Tim Tebow, or Charles Brown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthICE Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Yes, and I'd take Cody most likely. However, their offer would have to be pretty juicy. ^^ this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddaryl Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Swap 1sts with Philly then ask for 2 of their 3 2nd rd picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribo Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Swap 1sts with Philly then ask for 2 of their 3 2nd rd picks That is too high of a price. Swap the 1sts and get Philly's first 2nd rounder and their 4th rounder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tennesseeboy Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 For us the trade up/trade down situation might gel right after the seventh pick. Blue chippers who might be there and be more attractive to someone other than the Bills might be Eric Berry/Clausen. If Trent Williams or Dan Williams are there I don't think we will trade down, but if they are gone and we don't see an OT we like, it might be a good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 draft value chart says: bills #9 = 1,350 phil #24 = 740 difference = 610 phil #37 = 530 so to give up the 9th overall, the bills would get philly's 1st(#24), 2nd (#37) and a 4th. i would do that deal in a heartbeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 draft value chart says: bills #9 = 1,350 phil #24 = 740 difference = 610 phil #37 = 530 so to give up the 9th overall, the bills would get philly's 1st(#24), 2nd (#37) and a 4th. i would do that deal in a heartbeat. Yeah, I agree. Even the fourth round pick would be nice. But the 24th, 37th, and 41st all sound really sweet. We could address a lot of needs and still do BPA once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tennesseeboy Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 draft value chart says: bills #9 = 1,350 phil #24 = 740 difference = 610 phil #37 = 530 so to give up the 9th overall, the bills would get philly's 1st(#24), 2nd (#37) and a 4th. i would do that deal in a heartbeat. I would too. We could go a long way toward solidifying the offensive and defensive lines with those picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribo Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Tim is reporting the Eagles may be trying to work a deal with the stinkin' fish to move up to #12 http://espn.go.com/blog/afceast/post/_/id/...phins-12th-pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San-O Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 If we move to 24 im sorry but hello Tebow, and i hate it There is no way a rookie G.M. banks his first draft AND his future on a QB like Tebow. Not a chance IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Jose Bills Fan Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 draft value chart says: bills #9 = 1,350 phil #24 = 740 difference = 610 phil #37 = 530 so to give up the 9th overall, the bills would get philly's 1st(#24), 2nd (#37) and a 4th. i would do that deal in a heartbeat. I would probably do it too...however depending upon who the Eagles are targeting, our pick at #9 may be more expensive and higher than they need, to pick their guy. Also, I like a trade down in principal but 24 is (at least psychologically speaking) starting to get fairly far away as far as getting someone who is a solid, "can't miss" pick (keeping in mind that there's really no such thing). Here are the players taken at and after #24 last year: 24 Peria Jerry 25 Vontae Davis 26 Clay Matthews 27 Donald Brown 28 Eric Wood 29 Hakeem Nicks 30 Kenny Britt 31 Chris Wells 32 Evander Hood Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Jose Bills Fan Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Tim is reporting the Eagles may be trying to work a deal with the stinkin' fish to move up to #12 http://espn.go.com/blog/afceast/post/_/id/...phins-12th-pick I've read several reports that the Dolphins want Dan Williams but think that #12 is too high to draft him. It's not reassuring to read that when many believe the Bills will take Dan Williams at #9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I've read several reports that the Dolphins want Dan Williams but think that #12 is too high to draft him. It's not reassuring to read that when many believe the Bills will take Dan Williams at #9. But what are the chances he's available at #24? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 FWIW, from ESPN Insider: Trading partners for No. 12 pick (talking about the Dolphins, of course, but the same logic still applies here) * 18. Pittsburgh Steelers: If Jimmy Clausen falls to No. 12, it might be too much to pass up. * 20. Houston Texans: Might want to move up to grab Joe Haden if he's still there. * 22. New England Patriots: This is based largely upon their cache of picks (including three second-rounders). Any other season, an intra-division trade wouldn't happen. This year? All bets are off. * 23. Green Bay Packers: Mentioned by ESPN Insider Adam Schefter as a team looking to move up. * 24. Philadelphia Eagles: They want to grab one of the elite safeties, and have lots of trade ammo, including two second-rounders. * 27. Dallas Cowboys: Do the 'Boys need to move up this badly? Probably not, but we're still waiting for Jerry Jones to make his first offseason splash. * 28. San Diego Chargers: This depends on how badly they feel that they want Dan Williams and/or C.J. Spiller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I think Philly wants Spiller to replace Westbrook- Bills trade their #1 and Whitner for Philly's #1 #2(37) and #3(70) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I would swap picks and ask for Jason Peters. Except he'd sit out until the Bills reworked his contract to $15MM/year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts