Search the Community

The Lincoln project posted this today For 4 years, Trump made us a laughingstock. He cozied up to dictators. And made the world less safe. President Biden has reversed course and is providing the moral leadership required of an American President. Can't make up how out of touch with reality that shady funded pac is

They ja They have no clue and are just parroting pac script Their ad hominem and off topic replies kinda proof it They don't understand the topic past the headlines or talking point.

Like BlackPAC in Alabama years with doug jones. https://publicintegrity.org/politics/a-super-pac-has-raised-millions-to-mobilize-black-voters-does-it-matter-that-its-funders-are-white/

A liberal Super PAC that counts billionaire George Soros as a major donor is running racially charged ads in Kentucky against Republican Daniel Cameron, who says his Democrat opponent should condemn the “racist and hateful” attacks being aired ahead of next month’s election. The ad from Black Voters Matter Action PAC, an electioneering group that spends millions in support of Democrat candidates, is up with an ad that refers to Cameron as “Uncle Daniel Cameron,” and uses the saying, “Skinfolk ain’t kinfolk” — a refrain used by black liberals to suggest that anyone who disagrees with them politically is a race traitor. https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1717931269487579588

Fits here. Liberal Racism Strikes Again DAVID STROM Racists come in all shapes, sizes, and political affiliations. I haven’t met a ton of Republican racists, but they are out there. What’s different about liberal racists is that race, gender, and sexuality have become the defining categories of the Democrat ideology. “Intersectional” oppression and politics are so deeply intertwined that you get weird groups like “Queers for Palestine.” Shared “victimhood” throws together groups that shouldn’t be allies in any normal world. The intertwining of race identity and politics is considered to be so strong that the President can actually say “‘If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black.’ Black=Democrat. Conservative Blacks are considered race traitors–the same logic applied by White supremacists is at the heart of modern Leftist politics, just as gays are required to be Democrats, and so on. That’s how you get racist ads like this one from the Black Voters Matter Action PAC: “All skinfolks ain’t kinfolks.” That’s quite an assertion. Daniel Cameron is the first Black Attorney General of Kentucky and the current Republican candidate for Governor of the state. He apparently isn’t Black because he is a Republican, and Republicans are racists. Even though a Black man is their candidate for governor. https://hotair.com/david-strom/2023/10/27/liberal-racism-strikes-again-n588118

FAKE NEWS PACS

Oh, wait, you sure don't want to add the big bad scary PACS as part of your pathetic response?

Oh, LIES? Where is the LIE? You freaks can't handle the truth about your party. It's a fking terrorist organization. Also, I don't give a 💩 about your nonstop biching about PACS when you pick and choose to acknowledge the ones that make you UNCOMFORTABLE. Facts matter B.

^^^^^^^^^^ pure lies and fear being pushed By shady funded PACS and they just eat it up and stay angry.

First, no he did not say that in the clip. Your posting proves the second comment to be a lie. And in the big picture, it's just another case where some PAC puppet provides a narrative that you guys run with. or is it it just him that's now allowed to have faith? Other politicians also bad for similar? The Muslim members of congress?

Anything to keep the mob enraged. focused/consumed by hate and fear. yesterday one of this place "smart ones" was already parroting that sites garbage narrative through other shady PAC memes.

Whoosh. impressive. people just notice the grabbers only focus on the outliers while attacking civil rights. you know. math and statistics. ones in here read exactly like the Everytown PAC.

Every damn time. the left is ran by shady billionaires that use PACS to push lies and wedge topics. useful idiots.

Then realize the DEM house members were voting for the "Big Lie" Jefferies at every vote. while their fans and pacs pushed the narrative about "They are election deniers"

The background covered by a PAC that pushes wedge topics and is funded by fortune 500 companies including the big military industrial ones. Corporate Partners - Human Rights Campaign (hrc.org) wonder what you got to pay to get in the platinum level with companies like Disney, Northup Gruman, Pyzer? IS this what the backdrop at UFC fights will look like, with bud light?

Was wondering when the folks told what to do by PACS and charities (funded by war mongers and military industrial companies) finally understand they expect representation for the money and effort to get them in power. and it isn't them or their social issues. Was sad to see all those educated folks clapping like seals at HC pathetic attempts to shut him up.

ITs insane that PACS/Voices are attacking a law that protects kids from being raped by adults.

Larry Scott and his PAC 12 network completely destroyed the conference. He lived like a king on their dime and then walked away with $$$millions more. Meanwhile nobody watches the PAC 12 network because it's hardly even available. Scumbag The idiot presidents that gave him so much for nothing deserve some blame as well.

Six more billionaires recently donated to the Lincoln Project, a Republican-led super-PAC doing its best to defeat Donald Trump in November. The largest donor, supplying $1 million, was billionaire hedge fund manager Stephen Mandel Jr., founder of Lone Pine Capital, according to Federal Election Commission filings released Wednesday. Other supporters include Hollywood billionaire David Geffen (who donated $100,000), Boston media magnate Amos Hostetter Jr. ($100,000) and Silicon Valley investors Michael Moritz ($50,000) and Chris Sacca ($10,000). Martha Karsh, who is married to private equity billionaire Bruce Karsh, gave $50,000. This group of donors is following in the footsteps of Walmart heiress Christy Walton, who gave $20,000 to the Lincoln Project in January. Apparently pleased with her investment, she contributed another $10,000 in May. All of the donors except Walton have also contributed to Joe Biden’s presidential campaign or a super-PAC supporting the former vice president Not to mention the pedo connection. Does anyone not a DEM elite donor give a penny to that PAC? https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/C00725820/summary/2020

👆 👇 PACs told him that folks.

Anyone who doesn't see the establishment hated him is just being blind. and ignorant to the amount of money spent to get him off the ticket. Shoot, right now shady funded pacs are suing to keep him off the ticket. Who funds that?

Very profitable to the few that fund the PACS/charities that tell you what's fact. Trumps wealth went up when he was in office. that's new he might have been a thin skinned moron, but its night and day to Biden omics.

Well, I'm saying that he's only played one big game this season, yesterday, and has only played against two defenses that weren't bottom dwelling catfish. In the two games that he has played as such, he's 47 of 71, for 455 yards, 1 TD, 3 INTs. In the NFL that's a rating of 71.0. It's one thing to not put up a Heisman performance, it's another to do that. Here's the thing, you've mentioned how good he was last season, but that he has no talent around him. But only four USC players were drafted, all four on different units, 2 O and 2 D. His best RB last season isn't on an NFL team and the guy that's replaced him at USC appears to be notably better, and if I had to guess, headed to the draft after his senior season next year if not after his junior season this year. So why is this team so drastically different than last season's? I see no reason why it should be. If several players that weren't drafted left as seniors, that's not typically a big problem for schools given the massive backfills they have for non-stellar players. So why is USC worse this season? It's not from a significant loss of talent. The only OL they lost was drafted in the 7th round. Addison's the only player. Good QBs don't fold in college due to the loss of a single WR, no matter how good. He's got three more big games to step up in. Cal won't be a big game, but Washington, @ Oregon, and UCLA should all be big games. It seems like a longshot that they make the PAC-10 CG though. OK, but having said that, he had a key fumble that like cost his team a TD, had several dicey throws, and got lots of help from his special teams and even D late in the game in not losing by 20. I watched the entire 2nd half and part of the first. I saw it. He wasn't playing well. Not poorly, but far from a great game on his own merits, having nothing to do with the rest of the team. It didn't even approach rising to Heisman levels. Maybe he either overachieved last season or just got lucky last year, who knows. But lighting up Colorado, San Jose State, and Nevada, three teams with defenses ranked 127th, 109th, and 120th, to the tune of 18 TDs and 1 INT, while putting up 8 TDs and 3 INTs in five other games, an average of 1.6 TDs/game, two of which were also against crap Ds, 2 TDs and 3 INTs in the three games that weren't against crap Ds otherwise, and for not even 1 TD/game, hardly screams out Heisman much less that he should be the first overall draft pick. Not as I evaluate anyway. Let's see how he finishes. Come on though, he got lots of help from his special teams and D. Of those 32 points, 6 were that Pick-6. fAlready down to 26. SC's first TD was Lloyd's 45-yard TD run. Down to 19. Williams was 2 for 2 for 6 yards on that drive. His only contribution was a 13-yard run. He's not going to be great in the NFL because of his running. So we can take those 7 off too. Now we're down to 19, which is far from impressive. He had one and only one notable play on their second scoring drive, but Washington also deserves equal credit for that. Washington also deserves credit, alongside Williams, for getting wide open on the only other notable pass play by Williams for 40 yards. Two FGs otherwise, and that 61-yard PR set-up Williams' 13-yard TD run. I see two big pass plays in that game, that's it, as the primary reason for 13 points. That's it. I see a defense that put up 6, a PR that set up another 6, and Lloyd who ran for a 45-yard TD as the primary reason for 19 of their 32 points. IDK why not. Their team hasn't changed that much. But Washington and Lloyd did a pretty good job yesterday. No? The D put up 6 directly, and the STs provided a 61-yard PR to set-up Williams' 13-yard run. Meanwhile, on a play that could have won the game, Williams gets sacked on 3rd-and-8 to force a FG instead of going up by 1 or possibly 3 late in the 4th. That wasn't a Heisman play. But why isn't he doing better this season? They lost almost no one, by collegiate standards, in the draft. It appears to be nearly the same team. I'm having difficulty reconciling that. No one is. Burrow was about as sure a thing as I've ever seen. I would put Lawrence in there too. Also, keep in mind, that it's quite possible that he was overrated from last season. Again, he's got four games left, at least, and three of 'em are big games. Let's see how he finishes. But as of now, if I'm a GM looking for a QB, I'm incredibly hesitant to use a top-5 pick, possibly top-10, on Williams, based upon his play this season. I would consider last season more of a fluke, pending his play in November. Heisman's don't mean much to me in this regard. In fact, it's funny we're talking about this, but the other criteria that would make me avoid a QB drafted highly, is in fact winning a Heisman. There's a lot of irony there. The track record of Heisman winning QBs in the NFL is not inspiring. LOL You have to go back to Carson Palmer over 20 years ago, ironically from USC, to find a Heisman winning QB that even sniffed greatness in the NFL prior to Burrow, and discounting Bryce Young for now, whom I'm not betting on to join Burrow in bucking that. Here's a list of the modern Heisman-winning QBs since Palmer: Murray, Mayfield, Jackson, Mariota, Winston, Manziel, RG III, Newton, Bradford, Tebow, Troy Smith, Leinart, and Jason White. The list through the 90s is even worse. Murray, Jackson, and maybe Mayfield are solid starters, but hardly great. Over half aren't even in the league anymore I don't think. Several just sucked outright. Either way, the only way that I give Williams a percentage of ownership is if it's aligned with his contract from a percentage perspective, and 80% of it goes into an escrow to be paid back if he doesn't ante-up. LOL

Would be nice if you all held them responsible vs blind loyalty. But right now the left is 100 unison with whatever PACs and Dems tell you is the way .

Because of his conferences. Good defense has always been optional in the Big 12 and the PAC. Good offense is mandatory. This is just accepted fact in the CFB world.