bladiebla

Roster update to the site coming in 3 months...

But those teams also suffered greatly from injuries and/or suspensions...

Still there isn't a difference between a bust now or next year; so in the end you'll score one year early or fail one year early.

I wouldnt be surprised if they did, 2010 is uncapped the market might explode. If trading away our #1 next year and then some in order to get us 3 first rounders to fill our every and all need and will be able to start right of the bat I'd say go for it.

Whoohoo support... I mean why even bother even having the roster/transactions/depthchart... Just have Chris Brown open his own blog at blogspot.com and change the website to simply have one button "buy tickets - here - now".

That's the best looking photo of T.O.... well since ever...

Ok... Guess i'm officially wierd for finding this a huge annoyance...

Ok... it might be me... but i find the way the roster is handled on http://www.buffalobills.com/team/roster.html a complete shame. Also the transactionlist is annoying http://www.buffalobills.com/team/transactions.html. The glaring mistakes I've found so far: Gibran Hamdan - missing Dominic Rhodes - missing Pat Thomas - missing PK Sam - missing Marvin Philip - missing Dustin Fox - missing Mike Jefferson - missing Yet Peters was removed asap and T.O. was added asap... It annoys the hell out of me; sure with the old website it was hard to update blah blah blah. Now with the new website it seems to be no issue to add T.O. and remove Peters. IMHO the roster and transactionlist is the most important thing on the website since it is supposed to be factual information. Yet the facts arent complete. Simply put if you include a roster and transactionslist on your website then make sure it's uptodate on a daily basis. ESPECIALLY during off season where a lot of changes happen. The transactionlist doesnt even have T.O. or Peters. I mean it just undercuts the credibility of the entire website. P.s. If you found more missing or even wrongfully on the roster then please add to the list.

I really dont see us taking another WR(9 on roster) or even a QB(4 on roster), more likely a FB and maybe another project player for the oline.

Hmmm seems like this guy is made of the correct wood.

Hear hear!

I'm all for beating the odds. But I wasnt going anywhere with it, I just wanted to know how much of an impact it would have or that with a good pre-season it doesnt really matter if you rebuild your o-line completly. Ganesh his response clearly indicates it can be done. If we use the whole Peters trade thing to plug all our holes then I'm saying Superbowl baby!!!

Ty Ganesh!

Did any team ever reach the Superbowl with a completly revamped o-line? Or the playoffs for that matter?

good riddance imo

Hmmm....

I couldnt find it and it looks like it got buried in all the Peters news but NFL.com reports we have signed Dominic Rhodes to a 2 year deal. http://blogs.nfl.com/2009/04/17/bills-agre...with-rb-rhodes/ Edit: whoops allready reported and discussed in this thread, sorry: http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showtopic=87136

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probowl#Criticism sums it up nicely.... "The player voting has also been subject to significant criticism. It is not uncommon for the players to pick the same players over and over again; former offensive lineman (and SI.com analyst) Ross Tucker has cited politics, incumbency, and compensation for injury in previous years as primary factors in player's choices among themselves, resulting in players such as Charles Woodson, Ruben Brown, and to a lesser extent Jason Peters repeatedly being selected to the game despite having subpar seasons." 1/3 by fans (basicly a who's most popular or most known vote).

Wow he's got so much surge left from the taze that he types in capitals only...

Plus he really wants to do that as he indicated at the end of last season. Thx Tim another great article, love reading your insights.

In a strange twist that reply has me picturing you as a 73 year old lady...

If he doesn't report, and indeed goes for the 10 week holdout I'd say PUP him as soon as he returns.

Skooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooby

Pure win!

Lol, that's some serious ugly looking merchandise and then I didnt even mention the pricetag.