reddogblitz

Whatever man. We don't have Mahommes. We Could have had him, but our current brain trust didn't want him. They didn't want Watson either (I did). So we are where we are. I'll be rooting mightily for whoever lines up under center on September 9. Go BILLS !!!

And Brett Favre couldn't beat out Chris Chandler.

We'll see ... That's why they play the games. I'm hoping for the best.

How so? I'd love top end QB play in Buffalo. Hopefully we see it this year. It's easy to find evidently.

No it doesn't. Dalton is their guy and took them to the playoffs 4 years in a row. You gotta knock out the champ. Just because he didn't doesn't mean he can't be effective here.

I don't know. I haven't seen him play any non garbage time snaps yet. Have you? I think I'd rather have AJ than Mahomes at the moment.. Personally, I'd cut Nasty Nate.

The QB we're going to move up to get don't need no stinkin' WRs. How is heaven's name can you say Mahomes is better? He hasn't taken a meaningful snap in the NFL yet.

Please do.

So college means nothing, but draft order does? How does someone determine draft order if college means nothing? These are the same people that should the Bills ever win a Super Bowl will complain that we didn't win by enough points or our QB didn't throw for enough yards.

We don't need no stinkin' Wide Recievers. We're getting a franchise QB

Wouldn't doubt it. Scouts and drafters are suckers for measurables. As the draft gets closer they will get more and more nervous about putting their neck on the line with a short QB.

The last 3 Head Coaches he's had say he is a starter.

The Trent/JP offenses were dreadful.

Until some other QB comes in here and gets us back to the playoffs and we either win or lose by 6 or less, Hotrod is still THE MAN.

Best. we scenario: Bills win the Super Bowl.

Aikman and Manning played on some really bad teams as rookies, not playoff teams like Nasty Nate did. Yet none of them had 5 pick halves in their first start. The San Diego start was THE WORST since the merger. I started Nasty Nate on my imaginary football team that week and he got -7. the worst ever in the history of Fantasy Football. I forgot to change the next week and he scored more. A 0, but it was better. If I were in charge I'd cut him and either draft someone else late or sign a UFA. Maybe find out what Vernon Adams Jr. is up to these days. Why waste development time on him that could be spent on someone else? I have a new bottle of Tabasco in my pantry in case I need to eat some crow later. Seriously doubt I'll need it. Nasty Nate has fumbled in every game he has ever played for us. Even in his magical pre season of 2017. He's been able to get most of them back however.

I'd take him back. Not great but better than what we have except KB and better than we're liable to get.

Thank you Dr. First.

1st next year

Drafting schmucks in the first round that flopped has worked too, hasn't it?

Actually it was 18 years ago. I'm all in on trading up IF we are trading up for someone we truly believe has all it takes to be the 15 year/every year contender/300+ yards per game/multiple Lombardi guy. If he's not that. then don't do it. Get some decent WRs and patch up the offense and pick a project like Falk or White or Lalauetta later on. There's another draft next year.

I'd still take our QB squad over Miami's or the Jets at this point.

How are the Jets and Fish QB holes not just as bad? And if the Clowns really start Hotrod, that's one deep hold right there

I would take the reindeer if I had to take a qb there. Might take a LB instead though. Probably go bpa. But that's just me

Yet we were better at it than 20 other teams.