Jon in Pasadena

Never cared for the stuff myself; made me feel stupid and nauseated, and that's not exactly something I strive for. That said, I have no problem with legalization provided that severe penalties are enforced for actions that threaten public safety (DUI/DWI, operating heavy equipment while impaired, etc.)

I can't spend much time on these boards, so when I have a clear shot, I gotta take it.

Fixed.

If you had the slightest clue how utterly ignorant this statement is, you'd not only change to a new handle, you'd also change your IP. Better yet, your ISP.

You read English at the rate of 0.8 words per second? So, what's your first language?

Maybe they gave him a free brain transplant before being discharged. That could explain the diagnosis.

What a coincidence. I'm glad you don't live in Cali, too!

Bills vs. Pats = rettata

You underestimate Jauron's excavation skills.

That would go against the Bills' tradition of letting their best players go for nothing, and needing to use a high draft pick to fill the holes they create.

That would possibly be the only pay-for-view event I'd ever shell out $$ to see.

We're lulling them into a false sense of security.

Yeah, gale force wind conditions are the perfect time to start flinging the pigskin all over the place.

We gonna cover this Evans dude, or what?

If there's any karma at all, the sideline official will get run over and squashed later in the game for that BLATANT non-call.

Hate bacon. Always have. I like brussels sprouts, broccoli, spinach. Peas, not so much.

Thought that went without saying...I was just economizing on posts & combined chuckle & serious reply, only I forgot the chuckle part.

Still works out to $10K / household. I wouldn't turn it down. I'll need a car soon, when my soon-to-be 16 year old Saturn finally bites the dust.

I get 11.5 trillion -- I think you're off by a factor of 10.

...And committing arson. </Hogboy>

He needs to tie it onto a crossbow bolt and staple the thing to Walt "Just Give it to Them" Coleman's !@#$ing chest.

This could come in handy. May I have your address?

What I'm hearing is that they'd most likely challenge on the 14th: since some gay couple have already been granted marriages, with all the associated rights and privileges, how can you now deny others the same rights/privileges without violating the equal protection clause? It will doubtless take a while to work its way through the system.

That's very exciting, but we were talking about Tiger Woods. Try to keep up!

You do realize that it's in the job description of those !@#$ing judges (California Supreme Court) to rule on the constitutionality of laws in the State of California, right? And their ruling (which you are free to disagree with) was that the previous law was UN-constitutional, regardless of how many people voted for it. That's how the process works. That's why this time it was framed as an amendment to the State Constitution - to make it impossible for the CSC to over-rule it on those grounds. Now, I guess, it would need to be appealed at the Federal level (state constitutions cannot violate the U.S. constitution)