leh-nerd skin-erd

Oh goodness no. In two weeks, a mush-melloned government-lifer geez with a fondness for slow grinding on youngsters and the wives of the weak takes over. It's time to move on, not stand down. To every season, turn turn.

Too late, prayers were already up on your behalf. You missed it by about 5 minutes-but thank you for thinking of me. As for the rest, I think you're projecting your guilt as a Trump supporter onto me. Or, again, you're lying. Let's just move on. I do sincerely appreciate your willingness to listen and clean up your language. We can't spell unity without u.

I fear that I have unleashed the internet kraken. I'll pray for you, friend. I'll actually pray twice, once for the lying, once in case you were just complicit. Heck I'll throw in a third prayer for your potty mouth. Today is a good day for you. Why are you getting all turnt up?

I think you're being untruthful. That's my truth, but it really doesn't matter one way or the other, does it? Either way, you're part of the problem.

It's one of two things TBlutarsky: You're not being truthful, which seems most likely. -or- You're complicit as Mr. Tuesday has suggested. You should look into your soul, or what's left of it, or other bright lights maybe forced to do so on your behalf.

No?

The first B is for Blutarsky,

Hey girl hey! I reject the premise of your question but as to how I'm doing I'm happy to share. I'm disappointed in the results, but I've been preparing for this eventuality for many years. It really was no more difficult than watching the way the wind blows, and attempting to figure out the price point when otherwise decent citizens would accept a buyout. Imo Biden Inc found that sweet spot in the last election. So, like yesterday, I got up, went to work and life goes on. Have a blessed day.

We all have bad days from time to time. Perhaps you might use the edit function and clean this up a bit?

Look--you don't have to puff put your chest, storm around and lie about things. Just stick to the facts. I never said I cannot understand English, it's my native language friend! Now, my support for Trump is not in dispute, so you repeating it over and over just makes you seem unimaginative, repetitive and boring. We can fix that. I've asked for you to stand up like a man and provide the data detailing your allegations. You have not. That says something about you. On the other hand, you could simply reply honestly that you're unable to provide the data because it's an outright fabrication. Remember, there is no shame in doing the right thing. So, to recap: Stick to the facts. There is no shame in doing the right thing. I don't know you, so I'm holding out hope we can meet in the middle here and you'll be honorable. Your track record seems to indicate you'll hunker down, so I have to prepare two responses: A. Nice! You did the right thing, and for that you've earned a certain measure of respect. Kudos sir! B. So, nothing, right?

So, nothing, right?

My goodness, I'm not the grammar police but what you typed is a step above gibberish. I'm guessing you've assumed the role of concubine and decided to carry Tibsy's water for him, and that's fine. Send over the conviction details as they relate to Mr. Mueller and Mr. Trump for Rooskie Collusion, for Mr. Mueller and Mr. Trump for obstruction for the non-existent (and according to Tibsy legal/illegal/legal) collusion, and any other of Mr. Mueller's charges/convictions/indictments of Mr. Trump. I can wait if you need some time, but in keeping with my goal in 2021 to be efficient, I'm including my response to your anticipated reply: So, nothing, right?

Just send over the details on Trump’s conviction. Or, send me the deets on the indictment with respect to Russian collusion and Team Trump. It should be straight forward—it’s your argument. Pre-emptively: 🤣🤣🤣🤣

You’re all over the page here Tibsy. Crime! No crime! Crime-ish! Crime-lite! I actually think YOU may have been hacked. Make it easy on me because you’re dialed into The Truth. Just fill in the blanks. Donald J Trump was convicted of the crime of _______________ on ___/___/_____. Disclaimer: I’ll duck duck go the data you provide to double check. Trust but verify.

You keep saying blah blah blah, but it always comes back to you being perfectly comfortable with law enforcement kicking in doors and looking to stage a crime scene. It’s crazy.

No, I’m not suggesting that at all. If the justice department had the goods on a crime that DJT supposedly committed the action should result in a conviction and expulsion of office of the crime reached that standard. That the DOJ tapped out, but not until it rat-@&$#ing the Trump admin for 3/4 of his term tells me they were either corrupt (98% likely) or grossly incompetent (2%). I am stating emphatically that giving anyone unlimited power to investigate someone to backfill a crime—should they find one—is exceptionally dangerous. Still, we know that people throughout history have abused power, and that power often corrupts. The much, much larger problem is that people like you accept that as reasonable because you despise the target and have some sort emotionally perverted view of what justice should look like. Your view is NOT that a crime should be investigated and justice served, it’s that it’s acceptable to investigate until you find a crime or can create one. Worse, you reward the corrupt with the highest office in the land, guaranteeing the perpetuation of the system. Your perspective really is why I’ve come to realize that the only way to win these battles is to respond in kind, hence the politics of personal destruction. It’s sad, and the collateral damage caused will be significant, but it’s the way the game is played.

I try to understand this perspective, I really do. I just don’t get it. Liberals constantly bash on law enforcement for overreach and over-aggressive tactics. It doesn’t seem to matter that there are millions and millions of interactions between law enforcement and ordinary citizens everyday that are civil, normal and in many cases, heroic. Yet here you are praising a massive, no holds barred, unlimited and unfettered investigation into something that—even buying your narrative—-isn’t a crime. It was never about a crime, heck our friend @Deranged Rhino and others called that out nearly a half-century ago now. This was always about nothing, with an eye toward creating something. “Collusion” got you and yours all amped up and when that faded, they screamed “obstruction” because that was the only outcome that resulted in any substantive penalty. Along the way they used fear, the frightening power of the US government, and the propaganda arm of the National media to keep folks like you on the edge of your seat. In other words, they told you what to think in spite of our legal system, you obliged without question, and when it all fell apart with a confused old man (there’s a trend in Dem leadership) losing track of what was said and done, they told you again to just be OUTRAGED that ‘collusion’ was never a crime. You don’t have to oblige. What concerns me is how quickly you all fall in line in defending special counsel type overreach v say, shedding tears over a Jacob Blake type incident.

The only thing that came out of his report was that the govt will go to extraordinary lengths to create a narrative to crush you and everyone around you if you go against the grain. In fact, they don’t even have to be particularly good at it because folks like Tibsy will believe what they say in spite of a horrendous performance by a bureaucrat like Mueller. He looked like a college kid totally unprepared to talk about a term paper he swiped off the internet.

Thank you so much for this post and the link. The last paragrap was one the funniest things I’ve seen in a while. From the insight into his steez being Polo Down v BB in hoodies, getting the stench of Patriotness on him and realizing it never comes off, I feel I know him just a little bit better. My favorite though it the arbitrarily placed one word sentence that implies so much more than the 4 letters strung together: Boom. Cam Newton is the Chaz Michael Michaels of pro football.

Indeed. Not to mention his actions run directly in contrast to what he suggests all the little people do—hunker down, lay low and minimize being out and about. He’ll likely drive past (or fly over in his helicopter) hundreds of businesses directly and irrevocably harmed by the shutdowns so he can attend the gladiator games. Do as I say, not as I do.

Well, when you and I disagree on something as fundamental as what constitutes working well with a president, it seems silly to waste time and energy debating it. I’ll leave you with the thought that if Biden, his family and those in his circle are treated as well as they treated DJT and his family, it will be a successful four years of opposition leadership. I’d be comfortable with that. This is something we can agree on.

I’ll assume you see the last 4 years of dem leadership as having worked with Trump and supported him. Cool spin brev. As for the all out assault strategy, the last four years show that the opposition party attempting to destroy a president with baseless allegations is actually quite an effective strategy.

I struggle with how anyone in favor of shutdowns see it any other way. I have read a bit in the COVID thread (the one where dissent is frowned upon), and had an innocuous comment on Cuomo attending the game sanitized and removed from the ‘fans in attendance’ thread on the main board. I see other comments dealing with the gov (pro and con) remain, but whatever. Anyway, our resident scientist here often refers to the data he’s seen re: COVID and prefers not to deviate from his perch when questions arise. Back to the game. We’re in the midst of a surge, lockdowns for certain activities apparently will continue well into the future or at lest until Biden has been president for 100 days and spring arrives. I understand and accept that 6700 people in a stadium built for 70k can be distanced. I understand that testing is required a few days before. If every fan attending magically appeared virus free it would be extremely safe. That’s not the way it happens though. People will be coming from many different locales, stopping to eat, interacting with others, exposing and being exposed. Once at the game, it’s not an exclusively outdoor event. Meanwhile, the governor who has an appalling tendency to sound as if he’s talking to special needs individuals when he’s good on camera (and an arrogant and condescending prick when he is not), he’s sounding the alarm while saying, in essence “In spite of the extraordinary danger this virus presents and in spite of millions of NYers losing their income and ability to meet expenses, it’s really vital that I fly in an attend.”. We went the full year with empty stadiums, but as the surge comes, nows the time to risk it?

Happy New Year to you as well. I hope you have an excellent 2021! I’m uncertain if you’re implying my comments had anything to do with your link re:Gohmert, but just to be clear, I thought @B-Man sent an entirely appropriate and enlightening link re: Hawley’s action and @Coach Tuesday response was uncalled for and unnecessary. I was shocked, and perhaps outraged. As to your question, I think much of what is going on today is about the future beyond Jan 20. I don’t know if it’s smart or not, and haven’t paid much attention to it. I think the path forward is clear—launch an all-out political assault on Biden and the legitimacy of his presidency and shine a light on his personal/political life. They’ll follow the same course of action with respect to Harris when the time is right. If Gohmert’s actions contribute in some small way to that goal, and it ultimately proves effective, than it was a wise course of action. If not, well, no harm done.

TB be fighting mad ta’day!