SectionC3

It better be good because this reeks of risking the health of kids so adults can keep the big checks rolling in.

What a joke all around. I hope they give a detailed explanation of the safety concerns that have been addressed since it was announced that the season was postponed. BCS players need to unionize now more than ever.

“Too much needed mobility.” Artfully said!

Copying the libs to own the libs!

Hoax. Also, it’s pretty impressive that you “snip[e] at ######s.“. Nothing like picking on people who can’t stick up for themselves. Looks like I may have made myself a new friend today!

Hoaxx.

Why would you want to find the leader of Antifa? These guys make you quiver in fear. I can’t believe you would run toward this grave threat.

Hoax. And you want to be my financial adviser? Maybe Trump could rake the federal forests. Get a bunch of dudes in MAGA gear to grab some rakes and lawn bags and get the job done.

More than one. And that’s too many. His rallies are an exercise in selfishness and narcissism. Perhaps you could go to the next one sans mask and take a photo of the festivities for us. To prove how safe it is, of course.

Rule #2 on “defund the police.” Also, please define “defund.” Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation.

Point #1: You also will not be my latex salesman. Rule #2 on your 50 m students “in use” figure. Also, $18.3b can “move the needle” in obvious ways, e.g., use in urban districts only, use only in certain urban districts, etc. Point #2: Rodney King and like incidents, among other examples. Call the NAACP for more insight on that question if you’re genuinely curious. Point #3: Scholarship money is an obvious incentive. Or future student loan forgiveness. The rest of the questions are for you to answer. I don’t work for you. Point #4: Incoherent response. Also, I don’t work for you. Finally, hoax to your feigned ignorance with respect to Rule #2. I Rule #2 your contention that you are unaware of Rule #2. I appreciate your anticipated cooperation.

@Chef Jim Hoax on your money point. Border wall will cost much more than the $3.8b figure you identified. And you want to be my financial adviser?? https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/national/immigration/border-wall-progress/ Hoax on your suggestion that police officers in school with guns intimidate only people of color, and hence no need for a link to address your falsity. The point remains, however, that communities of color have a more fraught relationship with police, and visible firearms on police in schools place no salve on that issue. Hoax with respect to your contention with respect to “forced integration.” The exchange can be done voluntarily, and should be incentivized. Integrated of extra curricular activities, such as athletics and performance art, also facilitates the process. https://ny02216770.schoolwires.net/cms/lib/NY02216770/Centricity/Domain/121/US_History_50thAnnivEdition_rev4_21_16.pdf Rule #2 invoked w/r/t your contention that some SOC have performed well in G/T programs and others have not. Unsure of the dichotomy to which you refer and request Rule #2 clarification.

Hoax. They aren’t my Rules #1 and #2. They are those of Deranged Rhino. So I take it by your admission that you also ignore Deranged Rhino.

Trump believes that wildfires could be stopped by a new technique that he, a lifelong city-dweller, has pioneered: forest raking. That’s right. Rake the floors of the forests and you still stop forest fires. All along I thought the forest fires occurred because Smoky the Bear is a communist arsonist Antifa agitator. Looks like I was wrong. It’s shoddy yard work that is to blame. https://www.politico.com/states/california/story/2020/08/20/trump-blames-california-for-wildfires-tells-state-you-gotta-clean-your-floors-1311059 Discuss, and please feel free to share your view on the efficacy of the forest floor raking initiative.

Visitors side tunnel end zone. About the 10 yard line and work toward southwestern from there. It’s small and obscured by tree canopies.

I believe Rule #2 requires a web link. I’ll continue to await your response.

Hoax.

I need the prior posts. Rule #2. Sorry. Need the full context. Back to work for you.

Who said anything about criminality? Only you. Unauthorized use is equivalent to theft. And, based on the article, it looks like some licenses might not permit use in political contexts.

Plot thickens, big boy: https://deadline.com/2020/06/donald-trump-campaign-rolling-stones-songs-ascap-1202973371/ Looks like there is a little glimmer of possibility to the ASCAP/BMI issue. Not saying that Trump is in the wrong here, but it’s reasonable to ask about the Fortunate Son use.

But is it the most significant effect? Or it’s he most significant threat the health concerns of the public? And what are the “adverse consequences” of which you speak?

I think the point of the song was that poor kids went to Vietnam and died, but the rich, privileged kids generally stayed home. I wouldn’t take the lyrics too literally.

Truth be told we don’t know whether the Trump campaign has paid its ASCAP/BMI fees. It probably has. But given the cash crunch it’s possible that was thrown overboard with the TV buys. Who knows. Bottom line: utterly ironic choice of song here.

And here’s the flaw in your approach. What’s killing businesses? Aside from movie theaters and like entertainment venues, it’s not government regulations. It’s the lack of consumer confidence. Gyms are not barring people at the door because of limited capacity. Restaurants don’t have wait lines where I live. It’s one thing to open the doors, it’s another thing to get people to want to pass through the doors. And that consumer confidence will not come back until we get the virus under control. Bottom line.

Nobody disagrees that “snuffing” is bad. But the best way to get things back to normal is to restore consumer confidence. Here’s the deal. You and I will disagree on the next point: Trump is full of ***** and not to be trusted on anything, and is especially untrustworthy on the virus issue. So I have no faith in whatever information is coming out of Washington with respect to testing, vax progress, etc. Here’s where we can start to agree again. Irrespective of whether one disagrees with the former view, and Irrespective of whether one can draw confidence from what comes out of DC, this latter point remains. Absent belief of consumers that they can return to “normal” safely, they’re not going to venture out and they’re not going to spend their money. And the longer this lasts, the less money we will have circulating throughout the economy and the less discretionary cash we will have that will be able to be spent. One (non-comprehensive and imperfect) way to increase confidence is to have everyone show a little courtesy to one another and wear the mask. Compliance around here is terrible, and it’s a significant reason I won’t take the kids to a restaurant, or to the zoo, or pretty much anywhere else we’ll incur a meaningful risk of running into an inconsiderate dope who might get them sick. All of these issues are intertwined, and I just don’t see how we fix the mess that has become the economy until we get the virus under control. We can all agree that the catalyst for the economic downturn and malaise of the last six months is the virus. So the best way to solve the problems? Put the petty fights about masks, hydroxychloroquine, the rush to the vax, and all of the related issues behind, wear the masks, work together, and get this thing done.