SectionC3

Get the whole conversation for me and I will be happy to revisit it.

Hoax. What the president called downplaying. he knew it was airborne and very dangerous in January. And yet he failed to warn the public and the states of that danger for several months. In the meantime, of course, he held large rallies, and refused to encourage proactive measures (mask use chief among them) that undoubtedly would have saved lives.

Eyes on the prize. Trump knew. But he downplayed it. And that threatened public health. Discuss.

Less meme. More Rule #2 compliance.

Hoax. Rule #1. Not classy.

You alleged a Rule #2 violation, sir. That was a hoax. I explained as much above. Before you invoke the rules, it would be good to perhaps read them.

Hoax. Rule #2 wasn’t created until last Friday, which, of course, was after that “debate.” Here’s my Rule #2 explanation for that point:

Rule #2. Again.

I’m gonna Rule #2 that, too.

Which is the proper thread? Perhaps if you would simply honor your Rule #2 responsibilities we wouldn’t have this problem. Sir.

Less chitchat, more Rule #2, please.

I’m asking you to address the substance. That’s what these Rule #2 requests are all about. Please stop hurling “bombs” (a Rule #1 issue) and get to work on your Rule #2 assignments. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation.

Rule #2, sir. Another one for your list!

Add another Rule #2 request to your pile, sir!

I’m going to Rule #2 your contention about the absence of “adult conversation,” the hurling of “bombs,” and the flight from the scene. Also, to the best of my recollection, you have several Rule #2 requests outstanding from this morning. Perhaps it is that you, sir, are the one in violation of Rule #1 here. Or perhaps it is that you would like to shame-shun yourself. How that would be accomplished is beyond me, but you are the intellectual standard bearer of the alt-wrong, so if anyone can figure it out, it’s you.

Please explain in accordance with Rule #2. Thank you.

Hoax. Also, copying the libs to own the libs. Well done. I guess. FYI, I didn’t make Rule #1. Here’s my Rule #2 explanation for how I didn’t make Rule #1. I strongly encourage you to familiarize yourself with those rules.

Said Donald Trump to Bob Woodward in February 2020. And yet Trump “downplayed” the threat of COVID-19 to the American public. A hoax it was not, and he knew it as early as February 2020. There are alternately many and few words for this startling news. Discuss. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/09/trump-coronavirus-deadly-downplayed-risk-410796

You have three outstanding Rule #2 requests and you spend your time looking at pictures? Unbelievable. Please accept this post as my reminder of the Rule #2 demands to which you have yet to respond.

I’m gonna Rule #2 the last sentence. Explanation, please. You’d think with only two rules these guys would be able to follow them.

Rule #2 on the shoe story.

Neither the time nor the inclination would be the proper way to say that.

This guy from Idaho is killing Trump on CNN right now. Just hammering him.

What’s the mischaracterization?

So you think Kelly is in on the “fix”? Interesting.