SectionC3

Got a ballpark time? I want to get Him some Trump gear.

When is Jesus coming back?

Burned it on legal fees. And TV in the DC metro area. Stable genius!

All I got out of that was your inability to comply with Rule #2.

If it’s good enough for your Dear Leader, shouldn’t it be good enough for you?

Hmmm . . . How does one support an opinion such as the one I expressed? I’m going to have to Rule #2 your contention that I could have supported my contention with Rule #2 facts. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation.

I’m gonna Rule #2 that analysis. Now it’s three Rule #2 requests. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation.

Got it. You can’t satisfy Rule #2. We know. Also, I’m putting in a rule #2 request with respect to your contention that there are “rules” that frown upon the discussion of this topic. Last I checked, the spread of Sturgis-related COVID-19 cases to the extent indicated in the article is breaking news. I believe this event, unique for both its size and the depth of its selfishness, deserves its own spotlight. Hence my exercise of discretion in creating a new thread to address this new and important topic. But let’s keep our eyes on the prize. You have two outstanding Rule #2 requests that you should satisfy. Time to get to work, sir!

By that logic we should all ignore you because you’re anonymous here. I mean, we probably should ignore you anyway given the absurdity of some of the things you say. But your anonymity alone might do the trick and allow us to avoid reading your posts. Hmmm . . . So, by not confirming, the allows the story to spread. But he could simply deny, and therefore squelch the story (assuming it is false). Seems to me that speaking the truth in this instance is to, among other things, stay silent. Which is exactly what he has done.

Hoax on the characterization of George Floyd’s cause of death as purely fentanyl-induced. Rule #2 request made with respect to that issue. Rule #2 request also made with respect to the representation that rioting occurred in “140 cities just over” that death. Rule #2 request further made with respect to the number of cities in which such rioting occurred. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation.

Sorry, my friend. This is a Rule #2 situation. I’ll have to assume that if you have time to post your hoaxy nonsense in this thread, you also have time to post your relevant Rule #2 information here. The fact that you haven’t posted your Rule #2 information, in spite of the fact that you responded in the thread after the Rule #2 request was made, leads me to believe that you tried to perpetrate another hoax and simply cannot satisfy Rule #2. Also, on the Rule #2 front, when I derisively call you the intellectual standard bearer of the alt-wrong, please refer to this post as my Rule #2 evidence. Thank you. I wouldn’t have paid $1 to hear Smash Mouth play. But $12.2 billion in taxpayer funds to hear All Star for the umpteenth time? Not worth it at all.

John Kelly denied a part of the story? He was, after all, you know, there with Trump at Arlington. So it would be pretty easy for him to deny if that part of the story is false. But he hasn’t.

I also invoke Rule #2 here. Please show your work. Otherwise, your claim of hoax will be considered just another hoax. Thank you.

This is breathtaking if true. There is no bound to the selfishness of the anti-mask crowd. https://www.thedailybeast.com/did-sturgis-motorcycle-rally-really-infect-250000-people?ref=home

Hoax. I’m pointing out the hyperbole in the “cities are burning” lie. It’s a fear-mongering scare tactic. And now, it appears that Smoky the Bear might be part of Antifa as well. Scary times, indeed.

Fake news. Nothing says MAGAA like sinking your own boat!

I don’t see any evidence of Rule #2 compliance there. Thank you in advance for your anticipated Rule #2 cooperation.

Sounds like there might be sunken treasure there now, too, in view of recent events.

Seriously. Battle of Lake Travis. Hilarious. Hardest I’ve laughed in a long time. Outstanding stuff from a truly funny person.

Sorry but I gotta invoke Rule #2 here. You said, and I’ll paraphrase, generals are profiteering from war. I still haven’t seen any evidence from you to back that up. Please how your work, sir. Also, FYI, the judicial system doesn’t “investigate matters like these.” Typically law enforcement handles issues of that nature. But this is Donald Trump’s America, so maybe you have a point on that one.

Hoax. I consider Wacky Zebra one of the best posters here. He is thoughtful, almost always right about what he says, and incredibly funny. And also not alt-wrong. Which is important, because I share his sadness that Bills fans could harbor such disturbing views about important things like our flag, our national dignity, the rule of law, truth, racial equality, and the inexplicable deference to dictators that Donald Trump has shown. Fake news. This place is an alt-right echo chamber that tries to chase off people with a competing viewpoint.

Hoax. It’s a “trump/pro-lie/anti-rule of law” crowd” and the “rule of law/pro-truth” crowd. A stark, or black-and-white, or binary divide, if you will. Hoax. I didn’t make a Gladiator reference yet. The “sword” and “shield” dichotomy pre-existed Gladiator in the law. But Gladiator is a good movie. Strength and honor!

Words matter, according to your side of things. Not so fun when literalism is the sword and not the shield.

I figured you would resort to hyperbole. The appropriate reaction would be sanctions. Perhaps more moderation would serve you well.

Hoax. Words matter. You're a literalist of convenience. In the context in which you used the word, "the" means all. And Trump does not respect "the" men and women in uniform. He respects some. He denigrates others. So let's keep our eyes on the prize with respect to that point.