SectionC3

He must be triGGered again because he’s saying nasty things. That’s too bad. I thought we were having a nice conversation in which he sets up a hoax and the rest of us knock it down. Yup. TriGGered.

Also, it’s either “discourage people from,” “caution people against,” or “warn people about.” If you’re going to be the intellectual standard bearer of the alt wrong, then it might be a good idea to at least try to sound like an intellectual standard bearer. And please don’t be triGGered by this point. I’m only trying to help you herd your flock. Carry on. Hoax. Rule #2 evidence, please.

Please comply with Rule #2. Thank you. Also, based on your “grave dancer” pejorative, you appear to have been triGGered. I’m sorry about that.

Nobody digs deeper and finds less.

Rule #2 on the first paragraph, hoaxmaster.

So not debunked. And, contrary to your representation, also a “study.” Just not a clinical trial of the spectrum-wide efficacy of HCQ, in part because it considered patients with poor clinical outlooks. Which, I note, is perfectly consistent with what Cavuto said. If you’re in a vulnerable population, this is a bad plan and based on nothing other than a Trump fiction which people like GG credit based on the identity of the speaker. Along those lines, your point about Africans and Asians not dying en masse from HCQ incorporates those outside of vulnerable populations into your group and overlooks the possibility that those in vulnerable populations did not fare well with the drug. So another GG hoax debunked. Happy Tuesday, hoaxer.

That’s not the way it works, hoaxmaster. You said the VA study has been “debunked.” Let’s start there. Rule #2 evidence with respect to the “debunking,” please.

I’ll take that as a no. Sad.

Hoax. You took the Cavuto quote out of context. Which is SOP for you, because you’re a known hoaxer.

What are your questions again?

Hoax. Have you read Abood yet, hoaxer?

Your post is a hoax. You’ve taken the Cavuto quote out of context. Which, of course, is unsurprising considering that you’re a known and hopeless hoaxer. Cavuto actually said that if you’re in a vulnerable population, and if you take HCQ as a preventative measure, then you will die. Hyperbole? Perhaps, but there is a study of VA patients indicating that preventative HCQ in a vulnerable population does more harm than good. Bottom line, another failed GG hoax. I’m sure this will upset you, so I’ll note in advance that you can’t spell triGGered without “GG.” Happy Tuesday, hoaxer. https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-neil-cavuto-shocked-trump-hyroxychloroquine-announcement-video-2020-5

You have it right. He should nominate now and have the senate hold the vote after the election. It would be a way to save the Senate and turn the Tillis/Gardner/mcsally/graham seats into referenda on the justice. Even if we all know the confirmation will be made in december. Otherwise the Trumpublicans could lose the WH and the senate. of course, if the orange man is really smart he would withhold the nomination until after the election. Might get the “hold my nose” vote from bush Republicans that otherwise is probably lost.

Fingers crossed!

Not surprising you would buy that hoax considering how you fell for the voter fraud hoax. Keep on sniping at yourself, hoaxer.

Tell your dear leader to stop spouting off about hoaxes. If he does that, then maybe I’ll stop using it to characterize Trumpian tropes and lies. Until then, the PWU complaint is a hoax. Carry on.

Hoax. I’d like to have a conversation. You’re just obstinate. It’s sad, really, because that type of behavior is why people with different viewpoints can’t communicate in our society.

You assume that every member of the PWU supports Biden. Hoax.

Admit it. You just can't quit me. It's probably because you want to be my financial adviser. We'll have to see how that goes.

Hoax.

So was it a rule #2 request; yes or no?

Let’s unpack here. Did you make a Rule #2 request, yes or no? Hoax.

Sorry but I don’t work for you. And since there has been no Rule #2 request, I’m not doing the deep dive you requested. In point of fact, it seems to me as the person eager for this detailed inquiry that you should take the onus of evaluating all of the posts made in this forum, determining which posts include a lie or lies, and then attributing that lie to a conservative or non-conservative. I’ll look forward to reviewing your work!

Not a hoax. Follow the steps: 1. Mike Flynn is looking at some time in the can. 2. Mike Flynn is a follower of Q. 3. The motto of these Q followers is “where we go one, we go all.” 4. So it looks like all these Q people are going to join Flynn in prison. Unless, of course, QAnon is just a big, fat hoax. Discuss.

You didn’t bother to read the prior post. Binding precedent. Now try Abood. Happy Monday, hoaxer. Also, you seem a bit triggered early this morning. I’d maybe try a cup of coffee, relax a bit, get the blood pressure down, and try to enjoy life. I’m sorry that I triggered you by telling the truth.