Matt in KC

54321

Fitz - Keep him as backup at reasonable salary, if possible, but his limitations are far beyond coaching. He's a great guy, but too limited to win enough to be satisfying. Chan - His play calling is often frustrating. Perhaps bringing in an O-Coordinator would be "enough". Given I generally like what I've seen of our personnel changes, he's my first stop answering for our results after addressing the obvious QB problem. Wannstedt- He has looked to be in over his head, but this is the start of a year in a new system. I suspect many of the issues are with the players fitting and being fluid in the "new" scheme. Nix - I'm a supporter. In broad strokes, I like his picks and his shift to us being a bigger stronger team. I don't know how much to blame him for us still sticking with Fitz as our starter. This is his biggest issue IMO. Ralph. I don't think Ralph is doing anything that is affecting our win-loss record. Maybe he has in the last few years; I don't know. If Ralph moves on, I personally don't think the Bills will still be in Buffalo so this is the bottom of any list for me.

398

Um.... Can it really be... ? Can it really exist? Like a tree falling with no one to hear it, or the Toronto Bills winning with no one watching?

While I agree with you, your comment is hilarious coming from "Marc Miller" with that avatar.

Why is no one is asking where the poll choice is for keeping everyone and just continuing like this forever?

Forget where you live. What I want to know is what kind of car you drive!

Win-loss record is not a QB stat. It is, however, a blue pants stat. Go blue pants!

On Sunday we play the 49ers On Monday we turn into whiners But if we should win Some would think it a sin To delay the team's redesigners

Here we go again Too beat up to hope, but still watching every down

Did he have to help the o-line block when Kelsay was out top rushing threat? OMG - I've totally blocked it out. Who was rushing from the other side!? (I've totally blanked! My mind tries plugging in Ryan Denney, which is not even close - - wrong, year, side, scheme...).

Thanks for that ray of sunshine on this beautiful unday morning. I spent a lot of time looking at team stats last night and was impressed with the Bill's standings so far, even with a miserable game against the Jets. The more I looked, the more I believed we were going to beat the Pats. Today's game is a very big one for the AFC East. If you're going to the game, do your part to influene the game. Get LOUD!

Fu(% the Patriots The disrespect stops this week Enjoy the baby

Is that just all we have for the wildcat this year? Each play has Spiller (or Dickerson) streaking toward Brad Smith at the snap? If so, we're going to have to throw in a hard count to try to get the D to jump as CJ approaches....

Gailey said. "It was great to get Spiller back because it keeps our Wildcat stuff alive, so that's good." What does that mean?

Thanks for posting.

You can say that again!

I was never impressed with Poz while he was in Buffalo. I think we should have a Stadium Wall sub-forum on old players. I for one like to follow them and see how everything goes for them over and after their career. How many Moorman threads do you tink will be started in the next two weeks? (Over/under = 5?)

I watched the game and didn't see that. I would have thought that it wrong, but you have a link. Go Corey!

I haven't checked the stats, but if Mallet played more snaps in college, I think that seals the deal.

I disagree. If this was the official site, we'd get every maroon coming here to rant/vent when they get worked up. And we'd be the first stop for every cast off from every other Bills site....

Why is that where the snaps are going without Moorman there to catch them?

So, moving on: how is he as an announcer?

Actually, it does NOT say they support the decision to give them a TD, just that they support the decision to not overturn the call on review.

http://blogs.buffalonews.com/press-coverage/2012/09/moorman-being-released-by-bills.html