The league has to appeal for a year suspension. If there is any time to set precedent it’s now. Hopefully there won’t be another case where dozens of women accuse one of their players of sexual misconduct.
Right. And now we also have the NFLs investigation saying there is no evidence of force, threats, or coercion.
How is that possible when we all read the allegations implying force, threat, and coercion? It all doesn’t add up right.
No. I’m asking how someone that has dozens of similar accusations doesn’t get indicted?
I would also like to know how the NFL came to their decision. Because if they don’t believe sexual assault took place then I want to know what they believe happened?
Most people have convicted Watson. But the people with the power to actually do something don’t believe the women obviously.
Obviously not. That’s just a ridiculous comment.
We have to remember most sexual assault is based on word of mouth with little physical evidence. How do multiple grand jury’s and the NFLs legal investigation team come away saying there was no force or coercion?
I know what I read. What I read was definitely force and coercion. So how is he about to get off only losing some money?
All I’m saying is that Watson seems to be getting suspended for making the NFL look bad not for actual behavior they found during the investigation.
The NFL didn’t find evidence of sexual assault. Yet we’re still calling him a sexual predator.
How does the NFL interview and investigate these women and come away thinking no one was forced or coerced into anything?
But we read news articles saying women were forced into sexual acts, but the NFL said they found no evidence of force or coercion.
So what the heck is going on here?