-
Posts
19,904 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Buffalo_Stampede
-
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Buffalo_Stampede replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
Man…. Honestly I don’t know. Because the refs always call it the same. There must be something we’re missing in the rules because every controversial call should’ve been a completion based on the ABC rule you posted. Every single one. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Buffalo_Stampede replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
Ok that makes sense now. There are two rules. I try not to read the NFL rule book. Makes my head hurt. So basically the 1st rule doesn’t matter at all. Lol. Thats where the confusion comes into play for fans. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Buffalo_Stampede replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
He tucked the ball. Forget he step argument. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Buffalo_Stampede replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
I’m so confused. ABC. A - Secure the ball. B - 2 feet or body part in bounds C - 3rd step, tuck the ball, or reach the ball. OR survive the ground. I always thought the rule was ABC and survive the ground. One of the most controversial incompletions is the Steelers TE. By rule that’s a catch. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Buffalo_Stampede replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
It says tucking the ball also, which he does. Also the Saints player does in the video I posted earlier. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Buffalo_Stampede replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
Reading the rules just confused even more. The rule even states the ball can move when hit the ground. I give up. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Buffalo_Stampede replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
Not only that he tucks the football away. He tucks the ball. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Buffalo_Stampede replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
Lol now I’m confused reading the rules. So they already say if you tuck the ball while falling it’s a football move. Are the refs calling these plays wrong? -
Poll: Which 2023 free agent do you want to keep on the roster?
Buffalo_Stampede replied to Lost's topic in The Stadium Wall
How are you replacing Edmunds? We have Hamlin and his less than $1 million cap hit that can start at safety. They can’t afford to have both Poyer and Hyde on the roster next year. Honestly I wish they never extended Knox. Could’ve given that contract to Poyer. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Buffalo_Stampede replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
Is this a catch? I think they should add a football move to the falling to the ground rule. Meaning if you get 2 feet and tuck the ball or reach the ball it’s a catch and possession. On this play they say he hit the ground before the 3rd step and the ball came loose. If they tweak the rule it would be a catch due to him tucking the football before hitting the ground. 2 feet is not considered possession. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Buffalo_Stampede replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
I don’t actually hate the complete the catch rule when out of bounds. It’s very simple rule to me. Probably the easiest to call. I only get confused about the rule when a player is reaching the football out while falling and loses control when hitting the ground. To me the reach is a football move. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Buffalo_Stampede replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
Yep. The football move according to the rules is falling to the ground. So you must maintain possession through the fall. I think they should tweak the rule to allow tucking the football while falling as a football move. Meaning catch, 2 feet, then the football move is a tuck or reaching the ball out before hitting the ground. There’s been so many controversial plays with this rule. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Buffalo_Stampede replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
The problem is when does possession happen. You need 2 feet and a football move. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Buffalo_Stampede replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
The rule is saying possession never happens until there is a football move. In this instance I would say Poyer tucks the football which is a football move. The rule as the refs called is Poyer caught it but was falling down out of bounds so now he must hit the ground and secure the football or it’s a catch out of bounds. -
Poll: Which 2023 free agent do you want to keep on the roster?
Buffalo_Stampede replied to Lost's topic in The Stadium Wall
If Hyde returns then you go with Hyde and Hamlin as the safety duo next year. I don’t see a way to keep Poyer and Hyde. -
I’m kind of Over the Hines Experiment
Buffalo_Stampede replied to EmotionallyUnstable's topic in The Stadium Wall
I’ll say this he is very explosive in the return game and that could be huge down the stretch. -
The pass blocking wasn’t a surprise. That’s one of the best pressure defenses in the NFL. Quessenberry and Brown are terrible. Quessenberry was playing on a bad ankle that got worse. Buffalo might have to start looking at the waiver wire. Bobby Hart is what we thought he was. They’re in trouble at that position. If I’m Beane I’m trying to get Eric Fisher in here.
-
He’s playing great but I think he’s the same guy he’s always been. The DL is letting him make plays now.
-
NFL Source - Elam Benched Tonight
Buffalo_Stampede replied to ChevyVanMiller's topic in The Stadium Wall
Let’s just be happy it’s not because he’s getting toasted. It’s never a bad thing to slow cook a rookie if you can. -
I’m surprised we’re able to get the run game going vs NE the last few times we face them. What is it about NE ? They aren’t easy to run against.
-
I’m kind of Over the Hines Experiment
Buffalo_Stampede replied to EmotionallyUnstable's topic in The Stadium Wall
We didn’t need him. It was a nice depth addition but Cook started getting rolling. That trade could’ve been about next year also with Singletary a UFA. If singletary or Cook get dinged up we’ll be very happy we have Hines. -
First Time in a While - It Feels Like Buffalo is Back!
Buffalo_Stampede replied to BuffaloBaumer's topic in The Stadium Wall
Difference today was the defense. Having Edmunds back was huge but the secondary with White, Johnson, Poyer, and Rhodes is so much more dependable then what we’ve had. Very experienced. Add Edmunds and Milano and there will be few breakdowns in the pass defense like we’ve been seeing. -
Joe Brady Rumor -- May be something, may be nothing
Buffalo_Stampede replied to glazeduck's topic in The Stadium Wall
Mike Shula would probably take over. Very good coach.