It's possible. Or it could be that people didn't like her voice. Everyone will have their theories.
But you put two women up against the same man at different times, and they lose. But you put one white man up against the same ma, and he wins. Then you can at least draw a very rough inference of cause. Correct or incorrect.
Though you could easily argue that a black woman being trounced so effectively is not the result of people being called racist and sexist, but rather a result of racism or sexism.
"I would have voted for the black woman - but you kept calling me racist and sexist, so i voted for the baboon instead"
Not saying that's the case. Its none of my business. But his argument is an oddly indirect one.
I just thought he'd be more square. But he's talking about boozing, swearting on air (if 'pissed off' is a swear word in the US), laughing at all the on-field fights. He's not at all what I expected.
Feels like the team really needed this performance. Feels like Brady's trusting the offence. The offence are trusting each other. And the defence are just having fun.
I'm hoping this is a watershed performance in the season.
Being totally unfazed by 10 yard penalties is a particular highlight. Plus redzone conversion seems off the charts good now
We seem to draft very creatively. Thinking differently to the herd.
Like, nobody else was picking Bernard that early. Coleman wasn't a first rounder. Shakir was ignored. We seem to be really sharp at the lower round picks.
We can really see the raw material of a player where others can't.
It's our firsts that are perhaps lacking a little bit.
the challenge resulted in a change of call. The fumble led to a yard back on the reception
not what they challenged for - but intent doesn’t come into it. They challenged the ruling and the ruling was incorrect. Even if the catch was fine