Turbo44

My bad - apologies. Hope Nate’s not fking with us. Not sure why he would?

Come on guys do some due diligence before posting this crap. That’s a fake Nate Geary account

Yes confused him with Murray, but Murray signed on 5/1 so maybe he was also the under $1.7m thing

Davis did have a high ankle sprain last year that hurt his year BUT, you are absolutely correct, DHOP is light ages better than any receiver on our roster not named Diggs. 3 drops in the last 300 passes thrown to him. Compare that to Davis’s, and for that matter, Knox’s.

Yep and also can extend Jones and push his money out. DHOPs contract can also be structured with “dead years” - like Vons - with a reasonable 2023 cap hit. We Can create plenty of space if Beane sees DHOP as a need. He may not.

Yep it’s why the Harris and Ford signing are so great

DHOP in a chiefs uniform makes them instantly better? Well yeah. Is there a team DHOP could sign with where he wouldn’t make the team better?

Neither should be on our roster tbh

How can KC/BUF not be a Primetime Game, and Denver and TB is? I know each team has to play in Prime Time, so that's maybe the reason??

Isn’t shavers 6’6”? Could be wrong but thought I read that somewhere

Our kicker was a 6th, Dane Jackson a 7th. Beane has arguably been better with his late picks than kid picks

137 (early 5th) for 150 (mid 5th) 215 (late 6th / prob a comp pick in 6th)

For - 150 and guessing prob a 7th??

BUF traded 137 to Washington - like it depending on return

No - ARI pick we got in a trade

I would trade down here if possible for a later 5th and a 7th - all lottery tickets to a certain extent at this point

Would he be a better replacement than Bates though? Can only keep so many interior olineman

Agree 100% - I wouldn’t have objected to him with our 3rd round pick

Tyler Scott wr is very interesting here

Yeah great analysis - you nailed it as we got the best receiver in the draft, wr or te. I wonder if they had him rated ahead of all the wr’s

Which could be the same wording for any of 31 other teams, though: "Bills trade for Hopkins may be close as terms, "figure out draft compensation and money"

Then you're competing with a handful of teams trying to sign him as an UFA and we'd never be able to compete money wise. Why not just swap 27 for 34 for a cash retained and restructured DHOP? Then take you MLB, DT or OL at 34. Makes a ton of sense - we get DHOP and the new ARI GM saves face

Would love it - 27 for 34 and DHOP. Like DW at 34 but might lean to LB due to bills non-use of TEs in their offense

As stated before, it's a no brainer: Trade 27 and a 5th for 34, a 7th and DHOP with ARI retaining $10m. DHOP restructures with Buffalo to even further reduce the cap hit. ARI's new GM can say he did well cuz he moved up for another 1st. We get DHOP, our choice of MLB at 34 and BPA at 59 (thinking OLINE, TE or DT), BPA at 91 (TE or DL or OL) and BPA at 130 (what's remaining between TE, OL and DL). Slam dunk, off-season won

As is every team in the NFL who has an elite QB......