BB@Shooter

Gentry was Trubisky's favorite target in camp. And Hollister has been with New England for 2 years and contributed in preseason this year. Had 2 TD''s called back. Not sure they would be stars by any means, but they couldn't hurt the Bills, that's for sure.

Good job Cleveland fan. Haters gonna hate.

Only a Bungals fan can defend that one. Lol.

Again, why do you keep saying you are a fan of all 3? Total goofball.

Notice AJ as one of the last qbs taken in the free agent market. Could it be because the Bills knew they were drafting a future longtime qb they figured they could hang their hat on? And AJ so superior in camp and exhibition games that he will be the starter. Lmao. You are delirious, drunk, or just funny. Keep up the good work. If you are such a big fan of all three qbs, why you trashing Allens qb rating against the Bungals? Anyone with a clue knows the reason why. And if you areally a true fan, you would know better and not throw garbage like that out there. You sound more like an Alabama fan or a Bungals fan. Or AJ's mother or side dish.

Can you please decipher the gibberish you just spouted? I know it is late, but either sleep on it or give up on it. AJ is a nice guy, other than that he better hope his wife doesn't like younger qbs.

You do realize AJ sucked against the Browns, who weren't as good as the Bengals. And that they weren't switching linemen left and right when he was in like they did to Allen. AJ doesn't move in the pocket or have the escapability of Allen. Plus AJ was overwhelmed against the Browns. Not one 1st down. That is horrible. He would have really gotten killed against the Bengals. He thought he was hurt against the Browns, he would be out for the year against the Bengals. Allen is used to dominant defenses playing for Wyoming. And now with proper coaching, he will only grow. Dream on. Rusty, after sitting for 3 days? Lol.

A guy can dream. But not being able to bring it against the scrubs until the 4th quarter sealed it in my mind. NP will start before AJ ever does. Guaranteed. It is between NP and Allen without a doubt. I am leaning NP, but am an Allen fan all the way. But think it is best to sacrifice NP. But Allen will end up starting by at least a third of the way through the season.

Wrong on the looking bad in the 1st half. All have looked good in the 2nd quarter when they played. Big difference. Agreed, the O-line isn't good enough to support any of them in my thinking.

Good thing it is only your humble opinion. Allen started based on his growth through practices and games. AJ showed he wasn't ready against the Browns. Why is that different than Allen against the Bengals? NP is the only one who was consistent, but never faced a #1 offense since week one. So we have no barometer to go off of. To be fair, only NP and Allen have shown growth. And Allen had pissy poor o-line play, receivers, and coaching working against him. It is a toss up between Allen and NP. And the thing separating them is the schedule. So let the 5th rounder start and let the franchise guy come in when it gets a little safer. And with this O-line, that is questionable. But just know, Allen will start this year. If NP gets past this schedule, then he is the guy, and trade Allen. But with that weak arm of his it won't happen. He will throw picks once they figure out he only has a short game. They will have him figured out quick. Unless the line can block for the run or the pass. And good luck with that thinking.

Hilarious! !!!!! So a guy that can't show up against scrubs finally does in the 4th quarter, and he is your guy? He can't get a 1st down against the Browns, who won 1 game in how many years is your starter? Too funny.

Great post bud. I am from Wyoming and want Josh to start. But even I have concerns. My only real concern is injury after watching the Bengals game. The coaching didn't make me feel very good. I can tell they weren't worried about Allen being fragile though. I wasn't until I saw how poor the line was and how fast they made the game look. Allen has grown a ton since his last game for Wyoming. I saw it at the Senior Bowl. He grew immensely. And from his 1st exhibition game to his 2nd, great growth. And then his line , his receivers , his defense, his coaching, and himself let him down on his 3rd game. But kick that game out and I am like you, let the learning curve begin. He is a natural that could be close to taking a team like New England or Minnesota to the Super Bowl. He wouldn't have to overcome all the defenciencies of a team like the Bills have. If people on here can't see it, this is not a team built for success. They are in a rebuilding mode. They cut out what they thought were cancers. If they were or not. Or trying to get the team back to where they cut loose guys stopping them from getting back to where they could rebuild financially. It will take time. But the bottom line is they hooked their wagon to Allen. Now, right or wrong, they have to decide which way to go. I personally don't know which is right. But whatever they decide is what I have to live with. I like your post a lot. And I agree with a lot of the so-called experts. If he is the qb you thought he was, then starting him won't ruin him. And before anyone on here disagrees with me, I ask do you know more about Allen than I do? Have you seen him grow and watch him from week to week, season to season? Met him, been around him in private or public? Watched a good percentage of all of his practices and games? Well I have. I have also been around his family, his teammates, his situation. So of those who haven't, you don't know this kid. I want to say guy, but have a hard time doing so because I think of him as a kid. But he certainly doesn't act like one on the field. Although he does in person. Josh isn't some one who will wiłt, even during the Bengals game he was learning. He ate the ball. He didn't throw an interception, he ate it, in more ways than one. The old Josh would have thrown it one way or another. But he learned that quickly from game 1, don't throw it just anywhere. He learned that quickly, unlike Peterman, who threw pick after pick against San Diego last year. Allen is a rookie, but he is learning fast, very fast for a rookie with very little help. But he is used to that, but so many on here and the media jump back and forth so quick. Go back and look how quick you guys jumped on the bandwagon, and how quick you jumped off! Amazing. I almost missed the sarcasm because I am so pissy about the O-line. Lol.

Slick, that is not even close to the first post he has been "sarcastic" on. Let him answer, or are you his twin? I can understand your thinking. But how many teams make a mistake on cuts and the guy goes on to prove himself? Different teams, different offenses, different philosophies, etc. ? You could be right, just saying. ...

Give up on the hate dude. How about fix the line and give the qbs a chance? You are like that one special poster that lays all the problems on the qbs even though thereally is more to the game of football than that. How do you think New England can just put in option B or C and make it work whenever Brady is unavailable? They have been doing it for years. Can you say they are a sound , balanced team? They took a play out of the old Raiders mentality and pick up vets that have a few more miles left on them.They get castoffs they managed to evaluate to slide into place while they are waiting for players to develop. Your picking on the qbs gets old. Makes you look like you don't know the game. Just because you post a lot does not mean they are quality posts. Find a different area to post your hate at. Allen is the future and they won't bring in anyone to compete with him. Get used to it.it isn't about wining this year. They know they have more time to prove themselves. They hitched themselves to Allen, and regardless if you like it or not, it isn't changing. So your qb rant is boring, much like your lack of knowledge of the game.

I have a feeling that statement wouldn't change much one way or the other. Either you are a good NFL qb, or you aren't. Sitting wouldn't help 95% of those guys to become qulaity qbs.

The pot calling the kettle black. You have a whaked way of seeing what goes on during a preseason. Next thing ya know you will say Obama is still El presidente. If ya can't beat em' , baffle them with bull$#'!. Nice try though. On one play he should have planted his feet. The rest of the throws you are talking about he didn't have time. Did you really want him to try and take the time to set his feet, the lack of time he had? Half kidding, half not.

You need to watch more games slick. So McCarron gets a pass for his crappy game because he got hurt? An if you couldn't tell, the Bengals defense was quicker and better than the Browns. By a far shot. And you didn't read about the coach experimenting with linemen and play calling? It is obvious there was blame to go around, I say 1/3 of it was Allens. You blame it all on Allen like a hater would. Wait and watch when Peterman starts the 1st game. If the offense doesn't play better he goes down in flames like the other 2 qbs did. Why is it you can't see the big picture? I think Allen is the best qb, but would rather see NP get the start. NP has played well, but he isn't the answer. It is bad enough the national press goes after Allen, but when our own uneducated or biased fan base overlooks what happened with our offense in the Bengal game to justify their own wants, I can't support them as real fans to want our new qb to fail.

Great post.

Did you not listen to the announcers? They said they were coverage sacks. Now that was easy. And others on here said we were running intermediate to long pass patterns and there was no time for checkdowns because the backs and tight ends had to stay in and block. Any other exiting news I don't know about? Last game the coaching staff worked on Allens short game, not this game according to different sources. But they let Peterman take what the D was giving him and ran the short game for the most part.

Really? So Cincinnati scored that easily on us with a basic scheme? And you know this about Cincinnati how? Supposedly the defenses are supposed to be vanilla also, but they aren't. How do you explain that away? Cleveland was throwing all sorts of stunts at our qb's. Cincinnati didn't have to, we just sucked that bad.

It is obviously preseason for the posters to not have a clue and can spout off anything they want and not be held accountable.

If you know anything about Josh Allen you will know he never throws anyone under the bus. He is a stand up guy. 3 of the sacks were not even close to being his fault. And you don't know what the coverage or the patterns of the plays where he was sacked. You are just ranting.

Are you for real? Did you actually watch the game? Do you understand the basics of blocking?

Do you actually watch the games before you comment on them? There was hardly 2 seconds gone by on three of those sacks. Learn to count please. Plus you don't see what route the receivers were running, or if they were covered. So just chuck the ball like NP did against San Diego last year? Think a little.

3 out of the 5 sacks would have happened to any qb. The penalties took away from any rythem the offense could muster. The dropped balls added insult to injury. The offensive personell should have been notified that they were still fighting to be starters. Maybe that would have lit a fire under their butt. Allen didn't play well, but sure didn't get any help either. Some veterans should have stepped up and chewed some ass on the lack of effort.