Motorin'

Here's an alternative hypothesis. Russia invaded Ukraine due to real national security threats that they take seriously. Threats born in the Obama administration, carried out under Hillary Clinton's State Department. So the real guarantee of peace is removing the threats to Russia. No NATO for Ukraine. No missile defense systems East of the Dnipro. And a DMZ buffer zone between Russia and Ukraine. Now to the issue of the allies not trusting the US. They're liberal globalist leaders are parroting Democrat talking points. Don't care.

It's funny, the liberals argue that the Russians military capable is shite and incapable of much of anything while the otherside of their mouth argues that if we don't fund and arm Ukraine indefinitely then Russia will roll right through Poland and take all Europe. Which is it?

It's the argument that if Russia wins in Ukraine, then they'll take all of Europe next. And then the US will have to go fight Russia when Russia triggers Article 5. Which I would totally buy, if by wins he means Russia rolls right through and takes Kyiv in a matter of days. But if he means by win Russia keeping an inch of land in the Dumbass, then that's very hard to believe. Imagine Putin thinking, hey look we won 10-20% of the border regions in three years. Let's go for all of Europe next! Straight from Donetsk to the Danube! Not seeing it. Putin's the big loser, after the dead in Ukraine and the dead Russians. Biden's admin locked them into a stalemate. But that also means Ukraine can't win. So Zelensky is saying you have to fund us indefinitely to fight in perpetuity, because we won't accept the loss of an inch of land. And if you stop funding us, Russia might take all of Ukraine. And then you're next! But it's funny. If Ukraine accepts a peace deal and the active fighting winds to a halt, then the conditions for the suspension of the Ukrainian elections are no longer met. So Zelensky has a major conflict of interest. He gets to keep power for as long as the fighting continues.

Checks Starmer's footnotes: Boots on the ground and planes in the air, only in the event that Russia breaks a ceasefire agreement. Secondary note: and only if the US commits to boots on the ground and planes in the air...

Lindsey Graham is part of the problem and one of the reasons this was started. His dumb ass, along with with John McCain, planning with the Ukrainians to strike back at Russia in 2016, when they were assuming Hillary was going to win. And he's obviously a total slime ball.

Jesus. Waiting to hear, "that's not happening."

You mean perpetrator. But that's the point, treating the perpetrator like they are the victim.

It's really hard to get top 10 wr. And I'm certainly not opposed to prioritizing speed + suddenness in trying to find an outside wr who can get open quickly. But I think Higgins fits the Bills scheme, as well as being able to block. Which seems to be an important factor getting snaps in this offense. Kind of see him as an eventual Mack Hollins replacement if they were to take him in round 2. To be honest, I'm kind of hoping for three legit difference makers on defense with the first 3 picks. We shall see.

It didn't happen, It happened and it's a good thing...

"My condolences and all of our thoughts are with the family of the individual whose life has been lost," - Mayor Wu The only person that lost their life was the knife welding suspect.

Here's what "Homelanders" profile pic would look like if it was accurate:

I think he has a fluidity and smoothness in his route running that is a bit underappreciated when compared to extra twitch. I'm seeing a Drake London / Michael Pittman comp. He has some nasty double moves and can be a deep threat, but excels in the type of quick hit routes the Bills offense was built around last year.

Faster, much more explosive vertical, slightly taller, 2" longer arms than Tee Higgins. Similar college production. I'll take a 6'4" 215lbs outside receiver with good route running that runs a 4.47.

Liberal fan fiction is back in gear! It's like a chose your own adventure, make up whatever you want Trump to have said so you can share with your friends.

I like both guys. But they both fall short of the physical height / weight attributes I think the Bills are looking for... 6' and over and close to or over 200lbs. Agree on Riley as an 4th or 5th round option, and he's close to Tre White's physical stature.

Measured 6' 3" with 33"+ arm length and ran 4.3 flat. Wozer.

Arms, not boots. And also not a gift.

Yes, you're brain washed. It humbled Starmer, because for all his talk of sending British troops to Kyiv, he won't do it until the war is over and a peace agreement has been reached. Why? Pretty much for the same reason that Biden said he didn't want to empower Ukraine enough to actually defeat Russia. Only enough to force a stalemate and inflict damage on Russia. Why? Because in a scenario where there's an actual existential threat to Russia, they have the power to destroy every European nation within a matter of minutes. Maybe the English and French could respond in time and ensure M.A.D. But how about we never find out? Trump is right to press for a negotiated peace. The delusional and brain washed are pushing for an expanded regional conflict and potential nuclear war. By the way, any talk of "Trump is giving Russian everything they want!" Is B.S. Russia wants Kyiv disarmed. Instead Trump has motivated all of Europe to crank up their defense spending in support of NATO and Ukraine. Russia wants Ukraine to lose the idea that they have sovereignty. Ha! Another big L for Putin. You want to know who's giving Putin what he wants? All of Europe, who has paid more to Russia for energy than they have to defend Ukraine. Europe is weak because of an over reliance on the US for security and Russia for energy. Talk about predicting the future back in 2016.

Watch Starmer set Trump straight!

I'd add Darius Alexander to the impressive category.

I think they mean he was the youngest with over 100 tackles last season. Not ever.

This system would have worked in the AFC championship game on 4th down. But a chip alone wouldn't have solved the problem of Kincaid and Cook (and everybody else) being marked short. Cause the chip in the ball can't confirm when the player was down. I'm not against the idea of a chip, but the system will still need to coordinate with all of the available angles to see when a player was down.

A chip alone won't solve the problem, cause a chipped ball can't tell when a knee or other body part is down.