Motorin'

But Starmer said he's sending the troops!

Slava Ukraini! When do the the Brits show up in mass to fight?

Read my question again

When do the 20,000 English infantrymen arrive in the Donbas to fight off the Russians?

More lies

Maybe you remember Bill Clinton surrendering to Somalia after the Battle of Mogadishu in 1993? Which inspired a generation of jihadists plotting to attack the US (culminating in 9/11) while simultaneously putting the US out of the "able to end conflicts with the threat of strength" in Africa. Why don't you let the process play out before condemning with histrionics? Big Brother is watching! Ingsoc forever!

Exclusive: Russia could concede $300 billion in frozen assets as part of Ukraine war settlement, sources say https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-could-concede-300-bln-frozen-assets-part-ukraine-war-settlement-sources-2025-02-21/

So you're a big "Trump has to make peace in Sudan, Rowanda and Southeast Asia or he's a hypocrite for wanting peace in Ukraine" guy too?

Or you can just shut the ***** up.

Yes, Trump didn't demand and received an immediate cease fire in Gaza.

What elections? You just had your last one, right?

Or, it's working?

Or your have severe mental and emotional problems and don't know it.

Schiff is going down.

I don't want Ukraine to lose. And I don't want Russia to win. Right now, I think there needs to be a demilitarized zone with Peace Keeping forces. Ukraine and the rest of the Europe can keep building up their military capabilities so that Russia doesn't dare launch another offensive. The idea that Russia is losing and about to topple is probably delusional at best. They're in a war time economy and can keep going for decades if need be. Ukraine doesn't have that kind of man power. But even if that is true, the idea that something better would emerge from a destabilized Russia is kind of crazy. As much of a gangster that Putin is, there's way worse over there waiting in the shadows.

I think these are characterizations made by the entrenched left wing globalist politicians and media. I don't agree with a lot of those characterizations. I've seen deliberate misquotes by Trump and his admin. Like adding words he didn't say to make it look like Russia deserves the land they took. That's not what he's saying. He's saying it's unlikely that Ukraine is going to be able to win it back anytime soon. Not that Russia earned it or deserves it. He's being a pragmatic realistic instead of a delusional ideologue. And I think you're reading a lot of things that are being twisted by delusional globalists ideologues. He hasn't abandoned NATO. He's said for the last 10 years that the other NATO countries aren't pulling their own weight. His actions over the last few weeks seem to be motivating the change he thinks needs to happen. That the European NATO allies need to pony up. The nasty talk about the US abandoning NATO, along with the counter threats to abandon the US seem to be coming from the very people that are spiteful about the gravy train being turned off. I don't think Trump is abandoning NATO or Ukraine. I think he's trying to force a cease fire and bring a negotiated end to the war. Ukraine's position so far has been they won't negotiate anything but a 100% return of land. And they will fight in perpetuity to get it back. And they assume that means unlimited US funding indefinitely. Unfortunately for Ukraine, this admin doesn't seem willing to continue to bleed out of our military resources so Ukraine can fight indefinitely. The other part of the delusional ideology of the globalists is this hope that they can replace Putin with a pro-Western liberal. Their lack of ability to perceive reality amounts to failing to understand that if Putin is ousted, the most likely scenario is that Russia will be ruled by far more sinister forces. Those itching to unleash their nuclear arsenal on Ukraine and NATO allies supporting the Ukrainian war effort. So I read Trump's pressure on Zelensky and Ukraine as a means to force them to the negotiating table in order to prevent escalation, and to bring peace before this turns into a full blown regional war outside the borders of Ukraine. Which, if you listen to the globalists, is what they say the fighting in UKraine is all about. Keeping the fighting there so it doesn't expand to the rest of Europe. Trump's trying to end the fighting in Ukraine before it rages into something much larger.

Natural gas. Dip *****. Not oil. And unlike you, I don't feel the need to flaunt my degrees as proof of authority to claim victory. You should do yourself a favor and look into the psychological research on conflict of interest in medicine. Time and again the doctors with the highest status in the field, who happen to believe they are impervious to conflicts of interest, end up being most susceptible. Now you're taking the word of a murdering mercenary because it fits your narrative?

You offer these claims as an interpretation. Not as evidence. I think you're missing parts of the big picture. Obama moved on Ukraine after the discovery of natural gas deposits off the coast of Crimea that are so large it could effectively put Russian natural gas out of business in Europe. Burisma was the CIA backed entity to leverage Ukrainian gas into profit for the US. Behind closed doors, Hillary and her neo-con partners on the Republican side were telling the Ukrainians that 2016 was going to be the year that the US was going to help them take back Crimea. (And thus get the gas deposits). Ukraine is Obama / Clinton Iraq, Burisma is their Haliburton. The fake demonization of Trump as a Russian stooge was part and parcel with the Clinton plan to grab Ukraine's natural gas. Smear Trump as a Russian asset because he was the only thing (in their mind) standing between them and the jackpot. The same swamp creatures were cooking up plans to launch an offensive during the Biden regime to get the gas back when Putin invaded... No, Putin isn't the good guy. But at least tell the truth. The Obama / Clinton / Biden regime have been angling for 15 years to get their hands on Ukraine's natural gas in order to enrich themselves. And in the process cut Russia out of supplying gas to Europe. Trump doesn't have any equity in the Burisma project, and Clinton paid for a fake Russian dossier to say he's a Russian asset and then had the MSM repeat the lie for ten years. The truth just might be that Trump doesn't have the same view of Russia because he doesn't stand to make billions from Ukrainian gas.

Because Ukraine has drained American and European weapons stockpiles to dangerously low levels. Because he wants Europe to stop over relying on the US, get their ***** together and create a manufacturing base to be able to provide for their own defense. Because he sees the Ukraine war as unwinnable, short of NATO going all in on war with Russia. So he wants to avoid WWIII. Freezing this conflict along a DMZ will result in something more like the end of the Korean War than the appeasement of Hitler by ceding all of Czechoslovakia. There will be a demilitarized zone with peace keeping troops. Europe will get their ***** together, increase their defense spending and prepare for peace through strength. The idea that freezing the conflict zone in Eastern Ukraine will leave Europe susceptible to Russian aggression makes no sense if all of Europe commits to building for their common defense. The people that are most up in arms over the idea of peace are those who have been skimming off the top of US aid to enrich themselves. Ukraine can't win. To insist that they will win a war of attrition against a country many times it's size, who can rely on foreign troops is delusional to say the least. We've heard France and now England say they're willing to put boots on the ground. So far it's been all talk. Are they really willing to make their homeland targets for Russian missiles? I think not. And that's why we won't see French or English troops fighting en mass in Ukraine. Ending this war before it expands is the right thing to do for all parties, except the individuals enriching themselves from foreign aid.

The life long liberals who were paid to pose as Trump supporters in commercials telling people to vote for Biden are doubling down as current Trump voters with remorse.

I could see targeting Josh Palmer. He's mostly had wr #3 stats. But in his best season he had 72 catches for 769 yards. I think he'd be an improvement over Amari Cooper (at this point in Coop's career). He's got a high 60% catch percentage. And has some size outside. He won't break the bank, and could have some upside in terms of having better production playing with Allen.

His evidence is "because virologists say so," including the virologists implicated in gain of function research at Wuhan.

It's not just that there's no evidence it came from a wet market. It's that highly infectious viruses spread across large segments of a species before jumping to other species. And that jump happens across the population. Not at one specific spot, or in one specific animal. If CV 19 had a natural origin it would have been found in bats across China. And it would have mutated and jumped to humans across China. The fact that there was one hot spot for human transmission, within blocks of the Wuhan novel Corona Virus lab, and that no bats have been found across China with CV 19, is a smoking gun that it leaked from the lab. Combined with the clear signs of human manipulation of the spike protein / furin cleavage site, means that any virologist rejecting the lab leak theory is lying at the behest of Tony Fauci, who commanded that the lab leak theory be rejected... I cannot wait for the trials to begin. Pam Bondi and Kash Patel are going to be busy! Lots of Dr. Quack tears will be shed.