Jump to content

Buffalo03

Community Member
  • Posts

    5,617
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Buffalo03

  1. Or just keep both. I'm not worried about Von being Von again. As long as he is willing to put in the work. I think he will be fine. He strikes me at times to just kinda be going through the motions and that was before his ACL injury
  2. It wasn't inexplicable. He seemed lazy and barely did anything when he was on the field. I have no issue with us parting ways with him
  3. I read the headline thinking Milano and DaQuon would only miss 8 weeks. Damn you
  4. Ok. I did read that but again, how many plays do Chiefs RBs get stuffed behind the line because of missed blocked assignments or wrong lineups? And is that Mahomes's fault? Is Mahomes flawed? and what do you mean most of what I said is incorrect? You literally said if the offense struggles, it's because of Josh. But there are tons of things that make an offense struggle. Not just Josh because he is the QB. That's where you're ignorant and that IS what you said so don't give me bs
  5. Yes SOME. But you know some of what happens wrong in the Chiefs offense is Mahomes's fault. Is he "flawed" to? Josh is not perfect. But to say offensive struggles are 100% on him which is what you said, then you are ignorant. Dropped passes are not on Josh. Bad oline protection is not on Josh. You realize, that the pads protection calls may be right and that our oline just doesn't block the way they should, right? Or when a lineman misses his man, is that on Josh too? A RB fumbling a ball is not on Josh. Yes, you are very ignorant if you think that's the case. Get a life
  6. The sad part is, no matter how many valid points we make. You won't change your mind. It is NOT Josh's fault if WRs drop passes unless they are insanely off target which is not the case most times. It is not Josh's fault if he drops back to pass and had the entire defense in his face as soon as he drops back. But you think it is, you realize how that makes no sense and why you are ignorant, right?
  7. Shhhh. It's all Josh's fault
  8. He has plenty of times, yes What do you mean his recognition and anticipation? If by recognition you mean he should know when to audible out of certain calls, I agree. Otherwise, I don't think he has problems with recognition in plays on the field So, if we struggle because of dropped passes, that's on Josh? Are you really that ignorant?
  9. His only flaw is he tries to be Superman a few times here and there when he shouldn't. Other than that, he has no flaws at all. He is not a flaw QB
  10. I remember when we drafted Youboty. I read it as Youngbooty for a second. That was fun
  11. All I think about is him getting ran over by Derrick Henry with a mean stiff arm. I can't unsee it
  12. Elam is bad player. But this is the scheme he's supposed to fit in. That's why he was drafted. You don't sign or draft players for a 3-4 system when you run a 4-3 and then when multiple guys go down that excel in the 4-3 system put in 3-4 scheme players and then say "we didn't adjust to a 3-4". It doesn't make sense. These players practice all week in one system. Having to learn a completely separate system because of injuries don't make any sense and there isn'tany time. Especially making a trip to another country. You just plug in the next best players in the same system. Unfortunately, Elam is not good and as good as Williams may be, he isn't Milano. Tim Settle isn't Daquon Jones. Dane Jackson isn't Benford. That all makes a difference
  13. These players are drafted and signed because they are supposed to be scheme fits so when one guy goes down, the next guy steps right in. You don't change an entire scheme to accommodate a few players. They ran the same defensive scheme because these guys are supposed to have a smooth transition but the players aren't as good. That's the problem. And there are 4 of them out there.
  14. Changing our scheme with a downgrade in talent doesn't really help much. Eventually the lack of talent is going to show and be a problem. That's why they are backups
  15. What we did worked fine when our defense was fine. What we did this week didn't work because affected by missing an interior starter. A starting LB that got hurt on the opening series, both of our starting DBs out which is why Ridley had his way with Elam. Rousseau was out. You may not wanna look at it that way but it was a huge factor. You're one of those where our entire defense could be 11 backups and would say "the problem is our scheme". Not having guys that are very good high profile starters matters
  16. Yes they did. They showed his leg getting all twisted up in a pile of players
  17. How can we stop them consistently with 4 missing defensive starters?
  18. Yes but we were also operating with a defense down 4 starters. That makes a difference. It irritates me when I hear "no excuses" when we are missing almost half of one side of the ball. One player is one thing. 4 players is a different story. Kaiir Elam is a major problem. The Jags probably don't convert a bunch of 3rd and longs with Tre White out there. Or possibly even Benford out there. That stuff makes a difference
  19. Ok. Everyone needs to continue making plays lol. Not just them. Hyde has made plays is what I'm saying
  20. Hyde had 2 picks coming into today. He got beat on a deep ball today that he shouldn't have been covering Ridley on anyway
  21. So, we haven't lost 4 defensive starters that wouldn't have made a difference?
  22. Then you have to take into account that the Chiefs will have to lost 2 or 3 more times to even have a chance at it and we are already a game back
  23. Part of that is the shotgun run plays on 1st and 10 and 2nd and 10
  24. Just stop? Lmao. How will we get the 1 seed with no Tre White, Matt Milano, DaQuon Jones for an extended period of time. Kaiir Elam is a huge liability in coverage. We have to hope Benford doesn't miss anymore time. It's a mess right now. Just pure fact. It isn't gonna be easy
×
×
  • Create New...