Buffalo03

Lol. You make it sound as though there aren't millions articles on the internet about pretty much anything that can be read all the time free of charge. I don't expect "labor" to be given to me for free. I don't expect free food at a restaurant, I don't expect mortgages to be free like the other guy you are agreeing with. I don't expect to have my car worked on for free. That's true labor. None of those are the same as reading an article online. And it's not Mel Kiper himself charging for it. It's the company he works for so it doesn't really have anything to do with labor. Espn plus should be for programming, not for being forced to read an article here and there on their website. I say it again, peacock and Amazon prime offer tons of shows and movies as part of their subscription. Does that mean it's right to make customers pay for football games on their platforms when ALL other games are available on local TV? No

I like to read as many mock draft articles as I can. Whether it's from Mel, or whoeever else. Anyone can pretty much read an article like that for free in a lot of places but you got the select few that include into a subscription along with TV shows and all that that they want them to pay for. It's ONE article and people are forced to pay $10.99 even though, they get more with the subscription, I want to read the one article. No one should have to oay for that. Just like I think the Amazon Prime football games and the playoff peacock game should have been free and forcing people to pay for that to watch a game even though those platforms offer other shows is just wrong

I KNOOOOOOWWWWWWW. again, I don't want to read all of their articles or watch their programming. I want to read THIS article. The game of thrones comparison is not the same thing. I pay for Netflix, I don't do it for one show. Even if I did, I understand that that's the only possible way I have access to thay show. I think it was wrong to make football fans subscribe to peacock just to watch a football game. Am I wrong for thinking that way too? The articles can be included with the ESPN plus subscription. That doesn't mean they can't make each individual article free to the reader.

I didn't misinterpret anything. I understand that. But reading that article is part of that 10.99. I don't wanna read all of their content. I wanna read specifically about the mock draft and I can't do so unless I pay the $10.99. So, why should anyone pay $10.99 if they want to read one thing? That's why putting one article as part of the subscription is just plain stupid

Because you were wrong about what you think I meant and made an ignorant comment about it and I clarified which I shouldn't have had to do to begin with because me thinking a mock draft should be free to read being compared to me thinking I should just get what I want for free is dead wrong and anyone should have enough common sense to understand that. Now have a good day

You interpret me thinking no one should pay a $10.99 subscription just to read a mock draft the same as I should just get anything I want for free. Which is not at all what I meant. You can admit how wrong you are instead of making a snide remark about it and saying I got called out

What name did I call anyone? And I got called out for BS. You both completely misinterpreted what I meant and tried to ridicule me for it so you can kiss my a**

That's not what I mean and you know it. So get the f**k out of here Jesus Christ, if you don't understand the difference between that and just trying to read a mock draft then there is absolutely no help for you

I'm so sick of these paywall articles. I shouldn't have to pay it to read someone's mock draft

I would agree with this but Hill is linked to one these stories every year. And there is actual proof he beat the sh*t out of an old gf nearly to death. Eventually you have to realize where there is smoke, there is fire

Because every coach in the league would admit that? Kinda like when my friends tell me how good looking and incredible I am when women turn my down for dates

Media member to McDermott: Do you think you will win a Super Bowl? McDermott: I don't know

Well, it is the thought that counts

I'd like to buy a vowel

Cocaine is a hell of a drug

This also just in. The NFL has received numerous letters from Chiefs, Dolphins, and Steelers fans complaining about how the OT playoff rules changing, and the Steelers vs Bills playoff game being moved due to being "cold", are now saying the 12 million dollar increase over salary cap expectations is to help the Bills because Allen can't win the big one and they are sick of the Buffalo favoritism. More on this story as it develops

Sounds like they need to start drug testing before people can join the forum. Thanks for ruining it for everyone

I don't think he's the type of guy you pay $30 million a year to either

Reid is definitely the better coach. I agree there

The team names don't work for me. They make the league sound stupid. No one wants to watch the Albany Peanut Butter Cup Eaters play football

I just don't know if he is the type of guy that a team wants to give $20 or $30 million a year to. I could be wrong

Would anyone take him to backup Allen for a year if possible?

I'm confused. Do you want the Bills to win, or?

I saw no difference between Douglas this season and early career Tre White. Douglas had like 5 INTs after the trade to us. He is pretty close to elite. But every team only has 2 maybe 3 true elite players. The Chiefs just have a top 3 all time HC coaching them

I mean there's Milano when healthy. Terrell Bernard. Ed Oliver played at an elite level this season. Rasul Douglas. Those are more than just above average guys