Herc11

A run of 3 QBs and 3 WRs in the first 6 picks would be unprecedented. Not saying it won't happen, but highly unlikely.

I agree that it's an important step for Josh to make, as McDermott recently put it, become the face of the franchise. This move solidifies this as Josh's team. Now Josh needs to take the bull by the horns and demand excellence from his offense. With Diggs there, Josh would never of been able to do that.

The more and more I've thought about this the more it makes sense. 1: Diggs is 31 and prob only has a couple years left as #1. This draft is loaded and if you can get one of the top 3-4 WRs, you've effectively replaced him with a new #1 for the next 10 yrs. Trading him now, at least they got value to make the move to get one of those guys. 2: The trade clears his contract from the team going forward and gives them breathing room next year to move on from Miller if he doesn't produce this year. 3: dead cap is $31M. Diggs hit was $27M. So that's a $4M difference. Add on the rookie #1 WR cap hit, prob $2-4M and now that #1 cap hit is around $35M this year instead of $27M. They essentially are paying a slight premium to move on. 4: A rookie gives them, hopefully, a star WR on a rookie contract for the next 4 years or so, again, allowing money to be spent elsewhere.

So the name actually changes and would remain the English name? So the name actually changes and would remain the English name?

I think my brain went into safe mode and helped me forget how bad that draft was. Dear god, drafts like that are why a team will be in perennial suckage for years to come. The problems lies where its the same team drafting the massive disappointment year after year

Can you imagine being the kicker, the last line of defense, attempting a tackle on a returner that is now coming down the field full speed?

Regardless how much it's attempted. It's a cool element to the game for coaches to have in their tool box. A 45% success rate is pretty good.

A quick Google search came up with this: "In the NFL, about 10 times per year, a head coach pulls a “surprise” onside kick - which I define as one that occurs in the first, second, or third quarter of the game. This century there have been 192 surprise onside kicks. Those have been successful 87 times (45.3 percent).Mar 14, 2020"

That kind of sucks cause that eliminates surprise on-side kicks

I highly doubt 6-7 WRs get drafted before 28

I think regardless of these signings we still need a WR to replace Diggs and this the draft to do it. This may be Diggs' last year with us. What we do to get that WR? I think it's a fluid situation depending on how the draft is falling whether we stay put or move up. I'm sure they have their targets for who they are willing to trade up for if that person falls a bit to us. Maybe we get lucky and someone falls to us at 28 that the really like.

He'll probably pull a hammy signing his new contract. All jokes aside, dude is exactly the type of WR we need at #2. Big, physical, fast, and comes down with contested balls. Buuuuuut, has he ever played a complete season? Id only take him if he came in on a 1 yr prove it deal, which he may have to do post ACL. Is he also still getting all that guaranteed money from SD since they cut him?

I'd rather have Ekeler. He's the dual threat that Buffalo has been trying to get.

Still paying that dead cap hit...

Pretty much every big Chiefs game comes down to one thing. Who has the ball last. If we controlled the clock and score a TD we win. Nope, we stall and kick a FG. The SB ended the exact same way.

I stand corrected. I thought it was boyst. Regardless, no, I didn't twist anything. I stand by exactly what I said in both posts. There are plenty of conspiracies running around about her being involved. So if you believe that she is, then yes, you believe a conspiracy theory cause there is zero proof or facts to support this idea into anything more than a conspiracy.

Yes, I agree. I do see her concern with the tracking of her jet though. She's had several stalkers that have got themselves way to close to her. I also recognize that her and her PR team don't like the negative attention the tree huggers are bringing as well. That's definitely a large part of her problem with it. If Elon couldn't do anything about the guy the was tracking him, then I doubt she'll be able to. Is it even the same guy?

Wtf? Where did you even come from? Zero of my replies were directed at you. Are we only allowed to express an opinion that aligns with yours? GTFO

This has zero to do with the question I posed. I'm not talking about if you are annoyed with it all or not. My post was about whether someone believed she has fault in her _NFL_ overexposure or not. Was she just a girl in a relationship attending football games that everyone else took advantage of? Or is she involved in a deeper plot? My statement was suggesting that if you believe Taylor is involved in her over exposure in the NFL that you believe in the conspiracy theories surrounding that. Such as, the relationship is fake and is a media stunt collaborated between her and the NFL, etc... Do you believe she coordinated all the camera shots before,during, and after the games? The media and NFL taking advantage of her being at games and in a relationship with a player, has nothing to do with whatever else is going on in her life. Tell that to the people that says they are sick of seeing her because of all the overexposure the NFL gave her this year.

You realize a crime doesn't have to be committed to sue someone, right?

Is it really her fault that the NFL and the networks took full advantage of her newfound relationship? I guess if you believe in the conspiracies then you would say yes. Otherwise, she just a significant other that should have every right to attend her boyfriends game, just like every other player. I blame the NFL and the networks with their greed taking full advantage of the situation more than anything.

My point was that Lamar wasn't even the MVP on his own team.

That's exactly my point.

My bad, I thought I read QBR. Although, passer rating is also a made up calculated stat that has shown its weakness in the past. The whole reason ESPN tries to make something better by creating QBR.

Josh has haters, period. He has since day one and these people can't suck up their pride and admit they were wrong. The media should not be voting for these awards. Completely biased opinions.