Herc11

Maybe cuz we lost our WR 1 and 2 in the same off season

McDermott can't help himself. Had to go D back to back.

Would love to see them package some of those 5ths, the 6th and 7th into a couple 2's. To give them four 2nd rounders, 3rd, and 4th

Beane got a stock pile now toove back up in this draft

Beane really does want Franklin

SF must of wanted Worthy. Only reason for KC to trade up.

Dallas letting Det jump us to get who we want in spite of us jumping them for kincaid last year. Jerry got that petty in him

McDaniel prob got a chubby writing worthy on that card. Don't see him resisting picking him

If that's the going price, that explains why Beane didn't make the big move

Minny paid a STEEP price to move up 6 picks

It doesn't say the extent of her relationships with Pierce, or the other players. Does say she was extremely close. Maybe she's pulling a reverse Zach Wilson? I'd think that would definitely be behavior that could cause distractions.

My guess is, you have the game data for the top of the draft. Maybe they spend more time evaluating those they like rds 2-7 to decide where on there board they will fall.

To be fair. Humans are disgusting on the internet. But I do agree with your post

The dude that made the comment isnt wrong. A good amount of fans have turned in him and have absolutely been bashing him.

Why does that make him a dipshit? $100k to him is a drop in the bucket. Id venture to guess he is making a statement that he is the #1 WR in Houston.

https://twitter.com/jasrifootball/status/1776280133759844419?t=0mLfZ9s-US5O7MqrKFUzAQ&s=19

A run of 3 QBs and 3 WRs in the first 6 picks would be unprecedented. Not saying it won't happen, but highly unlikely.

I agree that it's an important step for Josh to make, as McDermott recently put it, become the face of the franchise. This move solidifies this as Josh's team. Now Josh needs to take the bull by the horns and demand excellence from his offense. With Diggs there, Josh would never of been able to do that.

The more and more I've thought about this the more it makes sense. 1: Diggs is 31 and prob only has a couple years left as #1. This draft is loaded and if you can get one of the top 3-4 WRs, you've effectively replaced him with a new #1 for the next 10 yrs. Trading him now, at least they got value to make the move to get one of those guys. 2: The trade clears his contract from the team going forward and gives them breathing room next year to move on from Miller if he doesn't produce this year. 3: dead cap is $31M. Diggs hit was $27M. So that's a $4M difference. Add on the rookie #1 WR cap hit, prob $2-4M and now that #1 cap hit is around $35M this year instead of $27M. They essentially are paying a slight premium to move on. 4: A rookie gives them, hopefully, a star WR on a rookie contract for the next 4 years or so, again, allowing money to be spent elsewhere.

So the name actually changes and would remain the English name? So the name actually changes and would remain the English name?

I think my brain went into safe mode and helped me forget how bad that draft was. Dear god, drafts like that are why a team will be in perennial suckage for years to come. The problems lies where its the same team drafting the massive disappointment year after year

Can you imagine being the kicker, the last line of defense, attempting a tackle on a returner that is now coming down the field full speed?

Regardless how much it's attempted. It's a cool element to the game for coaches to have in their tool box. A 45% success rate is pretty good.

A quick Google search came up with this: "In the NFL, about 10 times per year, a head coach pulls a “surprise” onside kick - which I define as one that occurs in the first, second, or third quarter of the game. This century there have been 192 surprise onside kicks. Those have been successful 87 times (45.3 percent).Mar 14, 2020"

That kind of sucks cause that eliminates surprise on-side kicks