SCBills

Achane sounds iffy based on reports, but as you said.. I wouldn't sleep on Wilson and Wright.

A lot of what I’m seeing today indicates that 60%ish of undecideds aren’t truly undecided. They lean Trump but are uneasy about it.

This man used to have so much drip, now look at him…

I try to be pretty open minded.. I have my views but try to call things as I see them. I’m open about my dislike of Trump and where he falls short. I’ll be honest.. nobody outside the MSNBC bubble agrees with your post here. It doesn’t mean they love Trump, it doesn’t even mean they’ll vote for him, but much of what you say here is delusional and clouded with bias.

Will be interesting to see if polling reflects this… Im voting Trump, but he very clearly lost the debate. Anyone saying he won is not being honest. The moderators were also, very clearly, a major story out of the debate. I see this sentiment from alot of independent voices today. “Trump didn’t come across well, but omg… those moderators…” I think Kamala probably could’ve got him off his game without their help. He very clearly fell for her crowd size bait like 5 minutes in. But with the moderators being so over the top, it blunts much of his poor performance.

This music thread is clearly not in sync with my tastes 😂 Current track starting off my workout playlist…

This is a separate topic - more of a political one, as opposed to moderator bias which I am discussing with the other poster. However, in relation to you question.. Trump doesn’t have a good answer on any of this. Mainly because the pro-life movement is very hardline and he needs them. But he also needs to expand his base to the undecideds. It also doesn’t help that he’s forced by the moderators to answer as to whether he supports a ban, but Kamala gets saved by the mods when pressed on if she supports any protections for the baby at all. As someone who loves politics in general as an observer… when the debate went abortion in Question 2, right after Kamala was able to put Trump on the defense over the friggin economy of all things Question 1.. I figured it would be a long night for him.

A fact check would be to point out what we’re discussing - not to blanket fact check the entire content of Trump’s comments under the guise of a fact check. But Linsey Davis is unaware of what’s going on in a few states - as it seems you were prior to an hour ago - and could not provide an accurate fact check. If you are incapable of providing context on such a nuanced topic in which Trump discussed multiple aspects of this issue, a blanket fact check with zero depth is unacceptable.

You're suddenly very concerned with the accuracy of verbiage on a complicated and nuanced topic in a debate format that allows you two minutes to discuss multiple issues at a time. This topic should be left to folks like you and I discussing what’s happening and deciding who and what we want to believe .. not being forced to digest a blanket fact check that requires this level of discourse to determine the veracity of such a claim. The fact of the matter, and the crux of Trumps point, is that under prior Minnesota law, life-saving care would have been provided that infant. Fast forward to Tim Walz changing the legislation, those babies were only given comfort care as they died. This is hardly acceptable to have Linsey Davis injecting her opinionated fact check into a live debate. And you know it.

Here’s some context on the topic. Linked below. And regardless, it was an incorrect fact check. We can discuss the nuance, but Trump wasn’t wrong & her fact check was quite literally incorrect. https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/08/06/under-gov-tim-walz-babies-born-alive-in-botched-abortions-were-left-to-die-then-he-removed-reporting-requirements/amp/

Linsey Davis fact check on abortion was wrong. Trump referenced letting the baby die after they’re born. This has happened 8 times in Minnesota since Tim Walz changed language in their legislation to require only comfort care to be provided to a baby that survives an abortion, instead of life-saving care.

Politically, yea. I think they’d be fairer to her than you think .. similar to the CNN debate. Also, I don’t think you know what free speech means.. not sure why you keep bringing that up in this context.

“Deal with these networks” = Don’t agree to debates/interviews with people who hate you. I forgot, there’s libs in here, and your first inclination is an authoritarian wielding of power.

Republicans need to be smarter moving forward. If they don’t blacklist ABC after this, then they deserve outcomes like we saw last night. Theres bias.. and then there’s egregious bias. We saw the latter. I won’t mince words. Last night went about as well as it could for Harris. Trump came across poorly and she never had to deviate from platitudes and attack lines. The GOP needs to take a long hard look at the political landscape and how they deal with these networks moving forward.

Well… That was an ambush. Trump took the bait and was off his game all night. Came across defensive & angry as the debate was somehow a referendum on a man who hasn’t been in office for four years. Kamala was on the offense, made very easy by the line of questioning from ABC, along with the absolutely unprofessional actions of the moderators. One of the most disgraceful performances by a news network at this level I think I’ve ever seen in my life. Republicans would be wise to blacklist ABC News from this moment forward. That said… what happened, happened.. and Trump needs to hope the news cycle moves on quick and he can get back to having the momentum he had pre-debate. Kamala didn’t do much of anything to educate voters.. nor was she ever pressed to by the moderators. But she came across far more coherent in her answers. My only critique of her is I have no idea who coached her to be so emotive with her facial cues as Trump was speaking. Extremely off-putting to anyone who isn’t predisposed to root for her. The Abdul line was classic Trump, but unfortunately the rest of the debate - for him - was him arguing with David Muir and having to deal with botched fact checks from Linsey Davis in real time. Especially egregious out the gate with the abortion fact check where Northam is on video saying that and Tim Walz did remove protections in Minnesota to save babies born alive after attempted abortions - leading to 8 documented cases of them being made comfortable as they died, as opposed to being required to be given life saving medical treatment. This is what Trump dealt with all night. But he didn’t handle it well. Remains to be seen how polling changes, if at all. The betting markets have.

We dominated Arizona after 1.5 quarters and in fluky fashion almost lost. Miami beat Jacksonville and in fluky fashion, won.

If Von looks like he did on Sunday, against Miami, he may very well come down with another 1-2 sacks. The only reason he didn't have a multi-sack day on Sunday was due to Kyler escaping, along with us mistakenly slow rushing most of the first half. Tua is not Kyler in terms of mobility and their OL isn't very good. Let's all hope Von, Rousseau, Jones and Oliver play to their abilities, because that will help Dorian, Cam, Rapp & Hamlin immensely.

Beat Miami on Thursday Night and I'm right there with you.

Lol.. Miami looked awful and Jacksonville literally fumbled the game away. You can think Miami is the 4th best team but to say "based solely on Week 1 results" is a hilarious take.

It is absolutely wild to me that some people want to pretend like Von Miller dog walking the Tackle back into Kyler Murray shouldn't count as a sack. Some of y'all gotta let that hate in your heart go.. not able to see things rationally.

Who was Campbell going at on the Jags OL? It seems, money aside, the Bills did want to get stronger on the interior against power rushers.. leading to the release of Morse and moving McGovern to Center.

Biggest difference in our division is the non-common opponents. We play Ravens and Chiefs, whereas the Dolphins play Raiders and Browns, Jets have Steelers and Broncos.

Not sure what to take from the BUF/AZ game.. Our Offense looked dominant against a bad defense and our defense was as bad as it's ever looked for one half and then dominated the other half. Chiefs look like the class of the AFC at this point, shocking, I know. BAL was outplayed most of the game and while they almost stole it at the end, their OL looks like a massive liability and Lamar can't play like that every game.. he won't make it to Week 10. CIN is a bad vibes team. I'm not exactly sure how good Joe Burrow really is and there's a lot of "me first" going on in that WR room. I didn't watch any of the Dolphins game, but I think they're probably a similar team to us and JAX is who they are.. an ok team that just can't get it together. Jets looked bad... and they'll probably get to our game at 4-1 or 3-2 at worst, but Aaron Rodgers arm still looks 30, but his body looks old.. get him off his spot and/or hit him a few times and he looks washed. Their defense lacks pass rush without a Bryce Huff/Hassan Reddick out there to compliment Quinnen Williams and I have no idea what happened to their run defense but that was a mess. I expected them to lose.. I didn't expect the game to be over at halftime.

Sounds good to me. According to those breaking down the game, Brown & Dawkins were dominant Week 1. Some of y'all thought we were retaining him for 12-15M!? Nah.. that was never happening. The options were let him walk or sign him to a contract like this. I can understand wanting to let him walk for that money, but it wasn't an "overpay". People are typically fine throwing big money at a skill position guy, but having a 18M per year weapon doesn't matter much if you're having to run around like Lamar Jackson due to a neglected OL. Hopefully we show Miami that it was a mistake to neglect their OL on Thursday Night as well..

Also of note .. Dolphins without Chubb and OBJ. We all knew this, but those are two guys they are counting on, who aren’t going to be out there Thursday Night.