SCBills

Trash. No idea what this station's obsession with Baltimore is every year. I think Miami and Buffalo have pretty equal rosters, so unless you're telling me that Tua is better than Allen, I'm not playing this game. KC and CIN, I'm fine with. This is the most talented team we've ever had, despite what the narrative based off last year's finish is... but I need to see what this team looks like before I trust them to be able to go toe to toe with those two when it matters.

He’s so obviously the best choice, yet it’s like talking to a wall with Trump supporters. If he can get the nomination, at least he’ll be able to win over MAGA by being the guy that will pardon Trump from the politically motivated prosecution of his idiotic document handling.

I'd be interested to see what the Bills are willing to pay Gabe Davis... Let's say Buffalo is willing to do 4 years at $$$ per AAV.... Would y'all be willing to offer that to D-Hop at say 3 yrs at the same AAV, then trade Gabe or let him walk after the season? If that money is already allocated, and the difference is simply accelerating the money due one year and taking a risk on a proven older player vs a somewhat unproven younger player.. I think I'd pull the trigger on D-Hop. If that isn't enough money for D-Hop, I'd then turn to Gabe and see if that works to lock him down before the season. I do agree with those who think Gabe is either locked up before the season or he is on a different team in '24. He either doesn't step up, again, then I think we'll decide to take a WR early. If he does step up, like Tremaine, we won't be able to afford him.

Agreed about the depth against a team also starting a makeshift OL.

I think last years defense could've been elite if Von and Hyde stayed healthy. Ultimately they didn't, and Tre never regained his prior self ability at any point in the season. Add in other serious injuries leading into the Bengals beatdown to end the season (Jones, Poyer, Phillips etc.,) and this defense was a shell of itself by the time we played Cinci. I do think Frazier was a liability in the postseason, so perhaps not a ton would've changed, but I have to think this defense performs better with a healthy Von, Hyde and Jones. Bengals only really had one injury against us on defense... their CB1. We were down EDGE, DT & S, along with two guys in Phillips and Poyer who had no business being on the field.

The leaders of our military are a joke.

All valid questions. Im not worried at all about McDermott. I just can’t see him letting this defense drop. This is what got him a HC job and he’s going to to want to remind everyone of that. In regards to Edmunds. I think the loss of him makes our defense different, and not necessarily worse. Very polarizing and interesting player, but he has very defined strengths and weaknesses - as alluded to by Beane. Regardless.. the swap of Edmunds for Floyd, Ford and Rapp is a significant improvement, imo.

If Von Miller is at least 80% of what he was last year, this defense could be a monster. We’re a bit dependent upon guys coming back from injury (Von, Tre, Hyde).. but if they are anywhere close to their prior selves, this is a Top 5 defense, legitimately. A defense that should carry over into the Playoffs. On Offense, people can think what they want, but the OL should be improved, Allen is healthy and the weapons are much better.

How can we make this about us? - LGBTQ, all the time

Oh?…

It’s disingenuous to ask this in the middle of June. The list of candidates is not what is there after the season. You could ask what people wish we did (past tense) or discuss this in the future tense, but as of right now.. everyone (college and pro) is locked in. The question makes no sense to demand an answer to at this point of the season.

Multiple year rebuild?.. Dolphins didn’t rebuild, with a far less talented and injury prone QB, under Mike McDaniel. If we underperform and/or come up short again in the Playoffs, I think the Pegula’s need to think long and hard about bringing in a new HC. AFC Championship Game is the minimum, imo, to potentially avoid this conversation. And if we don’t win that game, it has to be a competitive game, not another Chiefs ‘20 or Bengals ‘22 fiasco. I hope it doesn’t get to that.. but if it does, what exactly are we holding on to him for? We’ll have reached a point where we’ve seemingly plateaued as a franchise and risk him losing the locker room.

Ask me after the season. Im hopeful he is the guy, and this discussion goes by the wayside, but this question is nonsensical in the middle of June. If the team makes a jump in the postseason, I think most of us will want to stay the course. If we win the Super Bowl, his job is safe for years. If not, I’d think most will advocate for an offensive guy. The OC in Detroit comes to mind as an option off the top of my head.

Not shocking that you would react this way to one of the few Democrats that pushes back against the pharmaceutical industry, military industrial complex, mainstream media and censorship.

Agreed. I’m pretty excited to see what McDermott’s defense looks like. That being said, it’s bizarre that a defensive guy would allow his DC to run such a (seemingly) different style defense than the one he runs. Especially going from aggressive to bend-don’t-break. That seems like it would drive one crazy … I suppose the defense worked in the regular season, so alls well that ends well .. but those playoff games had to have been brutal to preside over?.. no?

Yup. They know exactly what this is about. They know their views are insanely unpopular, even in an almost 50/50 divided country. Because of the unpopularity of their views on targeting children, they intentionally reframe this as attacks on LGBTQ… but that doesn’t work anymore. Furthermore, they’ve collapsed support for the LGBTQ community, to the extent that people now feel free enough to now push back on Pride. What used to be a movement of inclusion and love, became co-opted by corporations and activists. And now, Americans are pushing back. They seem to be very persistent in wanting to target children, and now it’s not just White Evangelicals… it’s a coalition of Muslims, Hispanics and Black Fathers The media lies and obfuscation can’t save them … the truth of their intent has become known.

It’s still early, but man… I have no idea how DeSantis breaks through. He’d be the slam dunk nominee, with a high approval rating, if not for Trump. Instead, he cannot break through because the media is obsessed with DJT, and his approval rating is dropping because of the viciousness and cult following of die-hard Trump supporters. Can he win? Yea. Can he get most of the MAGA folks on board? Hopefully. But as someone who’s rooting for him, I just don’t see it right now. Not sure I trust any of these new polls, but somehow Trump is up 3-6 points on Biden nationally, with DeSantis in a statistical dead heat? I chalk that up to brand recognition and DeSantis unable, as it stands, to get his message out nationally - along with the true die-hard Trump supporters currently rejecting him I think we’re staring down the barrel of Trump vs Biden, when I’d venture a guess that DeSantis vs Newsom would likely be the best ideological choice for our country with two candidates in their prime. *I say Newsom because, regardless of his state’s failures, he’s a politician designed in a lab. That shouldn’t be underestimated.

PP realizes they are going to make more money off the cross sex hormone cash cow, therefore …

This is where it’s going to get awkward for Dems. These past few weeks we’ve seen protests from Armenians in LA, Hispanics in LA, Muslims in Minnesota, Muslims in Michigan and Muslims in Virginia, along with some viral speeches from black fathers at school board meetings.

You’re in the vast majority. Every poll on this topic shows Americans moving to the right. Whether it’s the targeting of children or the forced compliance of Pride, people are finally over it.

Yea, I’m done trying to discuss anything with you. You seem to lack reading comprehension, and - furthermore - when you can’t debate on substance, you cherry pick a sentence and decide you’ll simply make a random statement about that. The lowest form of debate.

Yes, there is a difference between a rigged election and a stolen election, given the actions typically associated with both terms. Stolen implies that Trump actually won, but it was taken from him. He alleges by fraudulent ballot harvesting and corrupted voting machines. I have not seen any evidence from his team that leads me to believe there is merit to that claim. Rigged implies that he was never going to win, because the powers that be were never going to allow it. In seeing how the media, tech, democrats and intelligence officials aligned on the Hunter Biden laptop story to censor, suppress and lie to the American public in an unprecedented manner .. yes, I do believe it was rigged. I do believe that certain forces within our government, media and tech were hell-bent on making sure they did all that was in their power to make sure he did not win re-election. And honestly, that should be obvious to everyone. Regardless of how you feel about Trump.

I don’t think Joe Biden is coherent enough to be a willing dictator, but everything Tucker lays out here is actually happening and his handlers have him acting like one, to an adoring media that treats him like one.

Ok, now it’s just weird. I’ve had to explain to you multiple times that I don’t believe the election was stolen via voter fraud. You literally just responded to a post of mine above, where I reiterate that I don’t believe there is proof of widespread voter fraud sufficient to alter the outcome of the election. And here you are again. Alleging that I believe there was voter fraud. You’re either strangely dishonest or are having a mental health episode.