SoCal Deek

This game boils down to Kelce against McD. If the Bills get it right they can neuter the Chiefs offense. If not Kelce’s going to have well in excess of a dozen catches.

I’m guessing that’s accurate but so is my statement on targets. The Bills passing offense is essentially ignoring the #2 WR. I’m not saying that’s good or bad, but it’s interesting to see how an offense can function with ten men.

Not sure if it’s ’not right’ or if it’s what they plan. A couple of weeks ago our #2 (Gabe Davis) had zero targets. This past week our new #2 (Sherfield) had zero targets. It’s hard to believe that’s by design but then again maybe Joe Brady is playing four dimensional chess.

Isn’t it actually pronounced HAWK?

I’m dying to learn why your job requires a ‘voice’. Are you a lounge singer? 😉

Welcome to the modern NFL. The television media can hide a playoff game on some ridiculous streaming app but the teams have to be careful what they wear. Sheeesh

25 years? Let me catch you up on the first 40. This might take a bit but here goes…. It was a warm summer evening in Detroit when a trucking tycoon set his sights on owning a professional football team. Yadda, yadda, yadda……😁

Anybody know if Beasley or John Brown can punt?

And so if that’s the case…and maybe it is…then shouldn’t the Bills staff have been doing likewise?

Rest maybe….prep work no. The Chiefs didn’t know who they were facing until late last night. And now they lose a day to travel and the Bills don’t, so it evens out.

Ouch….if you say so. 🙄

Do you know a lot of billionaires? Have you found them to be ‘not nice’?

It’s no different than picking your seats based on the sun angle. Unlike baseball, not all football stadiums face the same direction. (Most people don’t know that virtually all baseball fields face northeast.)

If you want my honest opinion the entire wind confusion thing sounds like utter nonsense. I guess it could be that the exterior skin could be used to break up wind a little bit, but that surface would neither increase or decrease snow.

Close. It was an f$ck up.

Yes it is….but the OPPOSITE side is getting the exact same percentage blocked by the roof.

I’m not being hostile. I’m trying to explain that just like a rain gauge collects rain the snow is going to fall on the roof, the seats, and the field in the exact proportions and percentages that each of those surfaces face the sky. None will be more and none will be less. So if the roof covers NONE of the stadium then everything will get snowed on. If the roof covers ALL of the stadium, then all of the stadium will be dry. And…if the roof covers FIFTY percent of the surface then fifty percent on the snow will be inside the ‘donut’. Make sense?

It’s the same thing you see in basketball. The coach wants to see how the offense is lined up prior to inbounding the ball. There’s no telling if it works to your benefit.

Huh? Physics isn’t your strong suit.

Answer: The refs are terrible. Period

Ugh! A roof neither CREATES nor DISAPPEARS snow or rain. There will be less of either inside the stadium by exact percentage that the roof covers when looking straight down on the bowl from an airplane.

This same thing happened to the Bills a year or two ago. I agree with you! Just because the ball touches the shoelace of a guy who is touching out of bounds it should NOT make ball be ruled out of bounds.

If the wind blows the snow, or rain, into the downwind part of the bowl that means the upwind side will be shielded. You only get snowdrifts on one side of your house.

No. The roof will cover the entire upper deck.

The cross sections somebody shared a few months back weren’t anywhere close to 70%. Maybe closer to 40 or 50% tops.