SoCal Deek

So what exactly is the issue here?

Yes please?

Only read the first page but I’m going with Gabriel Davis.

Is this actually a thread. Someone started a thread and their initial post is “eek”. Really? Gesundheit!

All good points. So when it comes a vote in your state please make sure you mention these things.

She’s so desperate to have an abortion that she’s going to refrain from having sex for the right to have one? 😂😂😂

All excellent points. So go ahead and make that argument at the State House wherever you live.

I actually agree with you the election cycle dominance thing...but that's exactly why a left leaning clerk leaked it. My wife constantly reminds me that many people care very deeply about this issue. I'm not one of them. But....I am in favor of letting the States make their own laws. If the pro-life movement is indeed the minority that you claim, then just let the democratic process play itself out. This isn't about arrogance. The Court is contemplating correcting their own wrong. Isn't that the exact opposite of arrogance? As I've said in other posts....should the Court have said "what the heck, slavery's been around for years....we should probably let it stand."?

Now what? You realize that same point can be used as an ANTI-abortion argument. For example, should a woman have complete control over whether a man's baby is destroyed? Don't hurt yourself with all this high-level moral philosophy stuff. Your sweet spot is anti-Trump memes. Bye Bye

Geeez....there are trigger bills are both sides of the issue, depending on what State you live in! Many, if not all, of those bills will almost surely be looked at again. Some will survive and some will not. You are clearly on side of access to abortion services. I'm not going to take that away from you. Make your case in whichever State you live in....or move. It's the American process.

Because NOBODY is talking about a woman's body but you and your friends on the Left. Can you guess which body we ARE talking about? See if you can. Think for a second. You can do it. I know you can!

Geeeez....let me catch you up here. The Supreme Court would not be banning abortion. That's not their job. If the leaked opinion is true and correct it's an example of the Court understanding their role in American system of government and correcting their previous mistake. You may not like it but I think we should leave it up to the Court to decide what they want to spend their time on.

Fascinating utter lack of logic...as is to be expected.

Keep digging "bro". You're making some solid arguments here today. (sarcasm)

So in the Vice President's view of the world....you can take your grandmother down to the basement and kill her, so long as you do it in private. Sure...that makes sense. How does it go again Kamala: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Privacy? No, that's not it.

The GOP is in favor of letting the State decide the issue....or what most people call DEMOCRACY! Can you post a childish cartoon that looks like that?

So the question is, and I'm certainly not saying that I know, is whether he was instructed to do that, or did he do it on his own.

Close. The concepts of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness were always preceded by the premise that all men are created equal. But to make that work, they had to convince themselves that blacks were not fully human. The exact same thing applies today. In order to convince themselves that life is 'take-able' the Left has had to convince itself that the forming baby is also not fully human. Same problem...different century. I am literally SHOCKED that Tibs (who's extremely sensitive to the slavery issue) cannot see the connection.

I don't know what that means...but I'll defend your right to say it. 👍

No doubt....but to my way of thinking, just about anything would be better than the strategy they chose to employ. As I said earlier these same type of strategies are used throughout sports to 'shorten' the game. I was very disappointed that they didn't try any of them.

"Teams can do it once in a given game. If they do it twice, officials are expected to declare the situation to be a palpably unfair act, with a 15-yard penalty and restoration of the lost time on the clock." How many times do you think they'd have needed to do it with only 13 seconds on the clock? The point is to not be blatant about it.

What rule prevented them from doing it? The game doesn't end. You are trying to burn clock.

It's been said over and over and over again. You simply hold the WRs at the line of scrimmage, take the five yard penalty, and the clock runs out. It's not complicated. In the NBA they do it in the final minute of almost every single game.

The baby is NOT her body!

I'm not the least bit intrigued to go to any of those international games...but...I've said it before, if the Bills are scheduled in a future year (and you can possibly afford to go) you will not regret the experience. We had a blast in London!