Shaw66

This is true, but it's not about Brady as much as it's about Belichick. Brady gets rid of the ball fast because Belichick understood faster than everyone else that there simply isn't any way to protect the QB consistently the way teams could do it 20 years ago. Pass rushers are too good, and schemes are too complicated, to expect your blockers to build a nice, safe pocket, play after play. Belichick accepted that reality and asked himself how to deal with it. The way to deal with it is to have an offense where you virtually always can get a receiver open quickly, regardless of what defense you're looking at, and have a QB and receivers who can recognize the situation and react to it. Brady is about as good at it as you can imagine. He's smart, quick and accurate. But it works because Belichick's schemes always have someone open quickly; Brady is just the guy who takes advantage of it. I think that's one of the reasons we heard McBeane say after last season ended that they have to get Allen to take the easy short throw. They've learned from Belichick and Brady that you can have something like a 90% completion percentage on those throws - they're short, the receiver typically is wide open, and the pass rush doesn't have time to bother you. It is, in fact, the modern substitute for the effective running games 60 years ago. You can complete those passes all day long - that's why you see QBs completing 15 passes in a row sometimes. And it's particularly effective because once defenses react to try to stop that maddening short stuff, by dropping linebackers wider and shallower, you start finding receivers 15 yards down field over the middle with no defender within five yards, so you throw it to him. McBeane want to make Allen Brady-effective. He's smart, he's committed, and seems like he's the kind of guy who work in a system like that. If he can, the Bills could have the GOAT, because if he can play in his head like Brady, he's bigger, stronger, faster and has a better arm than Brady.

I know nothing about this guy, but I saw something about him a couple weeks ago, and everyone DOES think he's a wizard. I keep saying the same things over and over. I think McD is a closet Belichick disciple. I think that's one reason he wanted Daboll. Belichick has a pretty simple formula. 100% commitment to doing your job, learning and getting better. Continuity. Be physical. All in, all the time. A lot of what McDermott preaches. And this is why I think a trade out of 9 is likely. Success in the Belichick system, and I think McBeane believe that success in their system, has to do with brains, commitment and hard work. Once you get past QB, the notion that a player is a "game changer" really doesn't fly in their system. They want good athletes with the right attitude. If a guy is a great athlete, that's nice, but it isn't critical. Belichick wins by having built a sustainable system and by being good at finding good, hard-hitting athletes who will work for him in the system. That's exactly what McBeane say about what they're doing, and it's why they keep saying they want to build "the right way." What they mean by that is that a team built with the right work ethic and solid offensive and defensive systems can win football games year after year by plugging in the right kind of guys. It's not a star system. Except at quarterback, and McBeane think they have their QB. They just have to nurture him like BElichick nurtured Brady, and not let a McCarthy-Rodgers problem develop.

I keep saying this and saying this. Beane has been clear - he's building the team through the draft. He's using free agency to plug gaps. That means we probably will seen af offensive lineman or two added to the team this year through the draft, and there will be one or two next year, and the year after that. In the meantime, he's signing free agents as he thinks he needs them.

That's probably true. He's like those couple of camp favorites several years ago - everyone loved the guys, and then they got cut and never caught on anyplace else. But I'll come back to where I started - the guy seems to have great hands, and great hands can hide a lot of ills. We'll see.

As I said, I don't think trade ups to move higher in the second are that noteworthy. We're talking here about using major draft capital to move up higher than 9. That's what I think is unlikely. But as I said, what do I know? I don't have Beane's private number. And Dawkins and Jones weren't Beane's drafts.

I wonder about this a lot, and you may be right. I assume three of the trade ups are 22 to 12, 12 to seven and 23 to 16, or whatever the exact numbers were. Not sure what the fourth one was, but I don't think it was in the first round. QB is a special case, and I think MLB is a special case for McD, because he's experienced the importance of having a star there. You may be right that he thinks the same about a star DT. (One of the adages I often quote is that the most important players in the game are the guys who play closest to the ball, and McD now has three of the four - Center, QR, MLB. Monster DT is the one he's missing, so you may be right.) But when you listen to Beane talk about the D line prospects, he says they're deep in this draft. He said it in response to a question about whether he felt any urgency to go after a position. The clear implication was that he wasn't in a hurry to chase d line talent in the first round. That doesn't prove anything, but it's why I think he isn't so likely to trade up. Still, it's clear he has no fear, so anything is possible.

I don't think this is they way he thinks about it, just based on what he's said. I think he uses free agency as short-term, stop-gap measure. I think he's looking for Matt Milanos in the 3rd, 4th and 5th rounds. I don't think he believes in chasing game changing players in the first round, not once he has his QB and MLB. I think he's look to increase the total talent level on the team.

I really don't think the Bills think this way. I think McBeane view it this way: We've got our quarterback. We've got our middle linebacker. Now our job is to add talent, wherever that talent may fall on our roster. If the BPA is a DE, great. If he's a wideout, great. If he's a corner, great. If he's a guard, great. We'll take whoever the most talented guy is, and he will make out team better. I think their philosophy is that we will fill holes in free agency, we'll add talent in the draft, and we will play with the guys we have.

Actually, I think Duke is a direct threat to Jones. Certainly his hands are better. Jones has the better 40 time, but Jones never has struck as much of deep threat. We will see.

Jet sweeps are going to Andre Roberts this year. He's a better quick returner, and probably better on the jet sweeps, too.

That isn't BPA. That's a needs driven formula. Beane has been clear that is NOT what he does. They put a value on every player based on how good they expect him to be in the league. They do not put any value at all on whether they need a player at a particular position. What Beane claims is that in the first couple of rounds, they take the name at the top of the their board, regardless of position. Now, I think truth be told, if the name at the top is a QB, they might take the second name on their board. Or they will trade down to a lower pick. I think I'm correct, but I'll admit I'm guessing. I think McDermott is more of personal leader and mentor than most coaches in the league. He's a different kind of animal from Belichick. There wasn't any press about where Williams looked. My recollection is that all of a sudden, out of the blue, it was announced that he had signed with Buffalo. I don't recall any news about any visits, to Buffalo or otherwise. I think Williams was flying under the news media radar. It was known, apparently, that he had permission from his Canadian team to look for a US deal, but I never saw anything saying this guy was available. Because of his history, I'm rooting big-time for him. He's worked hard to be a success, and this is his shot.

To Doc and Moorman - they're going to go BPA. If it's a receiver, they'll take him. But I agree with fundamentally - I don't think the Bills are now thinking that they have any urgency in upgrading the outside receivers. I think they have it covered satisfactorily with Beasley, Brown, Williams, Jones, Foster and the kick returner from the Jets. Belichick would love to have that receiver room - in fact, we know he wanted Beasley.

I think he is a guy who got religion, if not literally, figuratively. Or dealt with alcoholism. He went to Canada with a renewed commitment to finally realize his potential after having screwed up a few times. You listen to his coach up there, and it sounds like that's what he did. So when he was looking at opportunities in the NFL, sure, he didn't want to have to try to beat out Robert Woods. But as importantly, he wanted to be somewhere where he is less likely to fall off the wagon. And that's where I'm guessing McDermott came into the equation. I think he desperately wants to do everything right, and I think he believes he needs a leader to help him stay on that path. You gotta remember, this guy was the No. 1 receiver recruit coming out of juco. That means, almost certainly, that one way or another he has NFL level talent. This is a guy who has taken some serious missteps in his personal life and who, by all reports, is working very hard to put that behind and get back on the path to success as a football player. He's McDermott's kind of guy.

No doubt, the absence of receiver talent was important. He knows he isn't going to get a lot of shots at the NFL, so he wanted to go somewhere where he could stick. But when you read about his past and what he says about it, I think he was looking for an emotional fit much more than the average player might. Frankly, he probably also viewed as a plus the low key lifestyle of Buffalo compared to New Orleans or LA or New York. He sounds like a guy who is genuinely committed to staying out of the 'hood.

I think he chose Buffalo because of McDermott. He's kind of like a recovering alcoholic. He knows he needs a supportive environment. He knows that absolute hard work and dedication to his job is what he needs to stay away from the world that has caused him so much trouble. And he knows that McDermott preaches that ethic. So I think he's in Buffalo because he saw in McDermott the perfect combination of football coach and personal counselor. He's going to run through walls for McDermott.

This is where I am on the guy. As I said, I love how he catches the ball. I also love his determination. The stories about him are that he's gotten his head screwed on straight, finally, and he is a ferocious worker. He's going to do everything possible to make the team. In other words, he's McDermott's kind of guy. I think his hands and his determination make him a good prospect to make the team. If he doesn't, then he just wasn't good enough.

I'm guilty of over-proping Beane because I don't thing he's failed seriously at anything yet. But you're right about Whaley. And you're right about the Bills not being in cap trouble; all that happened was with a new coach and GM there was a new philosophy about how to build a culture and a team, and several guys with big contracts didn't fit the philosophy, so they had to go. Whaley had a pretty clear vision, but he hadn't gotten the right coach or QB yet. Beane had a different vision, which required a house cleaning.

People used to claim that Overdorf had too much control, indirectly, over major personnel decisions, simply by exercising his control as the cap and contract guru. I can't imagine that he has that kind of control under Beane. Beane is highly structured and organized. There is, for lack of a better word, a process. There's a chain of command, and whenever Beane talks about the chain of command it's clear that he, McDermott, the Pegulas and no one else are in charge. I'd like to think that Beane's view of Overdorf is that he is someone who, compared to others in the league, is very good at what he does. And it's fair to say thT Overdorf has survived because he has adapted to the process. The process is all about total commitment to the team and continuous personal improvement. Overdorf has goals and objectives that are established for him by Beane and Overdorf jointly; Overdorf buys into the goals and objectives and he must be achieving them or he'd be gone. That's the way the process works. Changing the subject slightly, one thing that gives me hope for the offense this season is that the Bills kept Daboll. Part of working in the process is continuous improvement. The special teams under performed in a variety of ways, and Crossman is gone. The oline under performed and the oline coach is gone. I'm guessing that McBeane's evaluation process told them that the special teams problem was at the special teams coach level, but the evaluation told them the offensive problems were NOT at the offensive coordinator level. I mean, no one would have been shocked if the Bills had fired Daboll after last season. The fact that they didn't says to me that the Bills have a high level of confidence that Daboll can do the job, based on how he performed last season. That is, Daboll survived like Overdorf has survived. Which leads me to expect two things that we've talked about here extensively: 1. Josh Allen is going to be completing a lot more passes to underneath receivers, because he will be told by Daboll, repeatedly, to take the high percentage throw. 2. The receivers who play will be receivers who catch the ball well. That's why they got Beasley; they've said as much. He's going to be Allen's security blanket, as he was Prescott's - "when all else fails, Josh, Cole will be where you expect him to be - throw it to him." And, I'd guess they're hoping, Duke will be another. He'll run the route and he'll fight like hell to catch the ball. "And, Josh, you see that really big guy? That's Tyler Kroft. You can expect to see him out there, too. And, by the way, you already know Robert Foster, and this guy here is John Brown. When the defense gets tired of letting you complete passes to Cole and Duke or Zay and Kroft, they'll bring the safety down to plug the middle. That's when you'll see Foster or Brown running past their defenders, heading for the end zone. When that happens, throw it to them." And I think that this vision is very clearly on Daboll's plate - he knows it's his job to make it happen.

I agree with this. I don't expect the Bills to trade up. I agree that picks=power. And, yes, I wouldn't rule out a trade up, but I'm guessing that given his choice, Beane would rather have more picks in the first two or three rounds than a higher pick in the first. I think he's at the part of his plan for the future where he wants to start adding a lot of good, young talent. I don't think he's looking for a few stars. He's looking for a lot of quality players. And although Beane is completely clear that in the early rounds he's going purely BPA and not need, I think there's a sly exception to that rule. I think if they get to their pick at 9 and their BPA is NOT a true need guy, they will trade out of 9 (if there's a trade partner). That way they get maybe a late first round pick and a second round pick. Then they package some later picks with one of their seconds and move up into the late-first round - to end up, for example, with something like the 20th and 25th picks overall and #9 in the second round. That way they have three good picks in the first two rounds, and THEN they go BPA with each. That increases the chances that one of their BPA picks turns out to be, conveniently, also a need pick like a quality offensive lineman.

Yesterday I wrote somewhere that McBeane don't do anything without a reason. I don't think they planned to do last off-season what they did this off-season. I'd say there is a very high likelihood that they did off-season last year pretty much what they planned to do. As I wrote elsewhere, I think their plan was to do a two-year tear down, with the rebuild only starting in the second year and continuing in earnest in this, the third year. Beane has said that they considered doing a more gradual transition from the roster they inherited to the one they wanted, but they decided that although that would be less painful than the housecleaning they did, it wasn't the best way to go. And it's important to recognize that it wasn't just roster turnover they wanted to work on so they could build the culture they wanted; they also wanted to transition to their cap philosophy, which is to write big contracts only for homegrown talent they want to keep. They said after their first season that fans should expect the team to get worse before it gets better. They knew it would get worse because they were going to continue to jettison players whom they didn't want (for culture reasons, cap reasons or both) and they weren't going to replace the talent except through the draft. That's the thought that was behind the get worse before it gets better comment. They didn't say it, but they knew they would get worse because they didn't intend to start investing cap room in veteran players. Even after the 2018 season ended, Beane said fans shouldn't expect the Bills would spend all their cap money heading into the 2019 season. That isn't how they're building. The evidence is clear that they've followed this philosophy. I think they've made only two significant free agent acquisitions: Lotulelei and Morse. They're the only free agents over $10 million a year. Hyde, Beasley, Brown, Murphy are all just getting average good-player money. I used to think average good-player money was $5 million a year, but with cap increases it's gone up, and those guys are all in this group. I don't want to start a discussion about whether any of those are good signings or not (for example, I think the Bills got what they wanted in Star - a solid presence in the middle of the d line with a work ethic that will make him a leader now that Kyle is gone, but I'm happy to entertain the possibility that he isn't what they hoped). But that isn't the point - the point is that their philosophy in free agency was never to build by signing a lot of high-end free agent talent. Their philosophy is perhaps once in a while to get a guy you want to build on, like Morse, but the rest of the time the philosophy is just to fill gaps while they take their time drafting the guys they really want. So, when you look at 2018, I'd guess McBeane were blindsided by Wood and Incognito both leaving. Their plan probably was that those guys would be around and they needed just a couple of free agent journeymen to help shore up the weakest spots on the line. They were planning, I'd guess, to build the line over several years, replacing Richie and Eric as the time came, gradually getting better. When those two guys left unexpectedly, McBeane did what they always tell they will do, which is to stick to the plan. They didn't panic and say "we need more linemen in here, NOW!" They didn't, because that wasn't how they planned to build a better line. They planned to do it primarily through the draft. So they stuck by the plan, knowing that they'd have a pretty ugly offensive line in 2018. That may be one of the reasons they said things would get worse before they got better. They didn't do last season what they did this season - bring in a bunch of journeymen olinemen - because they also wanted to complete cleaning up the cap situation. Beane has said he wanted to clean it up completely and quickly before he started consuming cap again. That meant he was going to use 2018 to get out from under bad contracts and NOT to start getting into a bunch of new contracts. So that's what he did. He didn't sign a lot of free agents. He did have the revolving door for receivers, but he never was investing any serious money there. Instead, he just let 2018 play out so that he could get to 2019, which is when (I'm guessing) McBeane always thought the rebuild would begin in earnest. They probably also thought they'd get an offensive lineman pretty high in the 2018 draft, someone who would be a 2018 starter. But then the QB situation and the MLB situation fell in a way where they could get the two core players that they wanted to build on, and they used draft capital to make those two major moves, figuring they were more important than a lineman. It's important to remember that they have a long-term view of this (and presumably have the Pegulas support in that view). So having made the decision not to sign free-agent linemen in 2018, even though they lost their two best starters, in part on the assumption that they'd get some help in the draft, they pushed ahead with the long-term plan, which was get a QB and a middle linebacker. When that happened, the free agent linemen that might have helped as a stop gap had already been signed. You can't get after the draft the kind of free agent line talent the Bills got before the draft this year. (Again, I'm not saying they got great talent. They got enough talent that the line should be okay this season. The point is that no talent like they signed this year was available to the Bills AFTER the draft last season. Just like this season, all the talent at that level had already committed somewhere.) So, no, I don't think the Bills tried to do last year what they did this year. I think they had a plan last year for how they were going to build. It didn't go exactly as planned, because Richie and Eric left, but they did what they always say they are going to do - they stuck with the plan. They stuck with it because their long term view for the oline did not include any journeyman free agent they could have signed last year OR any journeyman free agent they actually did sign this year. (Morse being the exception - he isn't a journeyman). Their long-term view is that they are going to draft the entire offensive line of the future, except that some free agent journeyman signed for the short term might emerge as a keeper.

Like, I'd forgotten Crossman was gone. Farwell has very little experience coaching - two years as an assistant at Seattle. But he was a star special teamer in his day. He must be an intense competitor to have been a special teams standout, and intense competitors are what McD wants. The heat will be on him, because I think McD intends the Bills to be substantially improved this year.

I really haven't paid any attention to special teams. Thanks for this write up. There may be other positives, but you identify several aspects of the special teams that should improve. Crossman was well thought of a few years ago, right? I agree that he'll need to be creative, because it's pretty clear that McD's expectations of everyone is to get better, and for the units that were woeful, to get really better.

McD and B don't do anything without a reason. If I had to guess, I'd say this: First, they didn't want to go into the draft with a new GM. Whaley had been running a scouting process for a year, had been collecting information, distilling it and making judgments. And, as has been pointed, his background was scouting. He was reasonably good at evaluating talent. Second, the most important decision was QB, and they (the Pegulas and McD) didn't want a lameduck GM to make that decision. So, one way or another, they forced the tradeback. By doing that they assured that the new GM would have extra ammunition in the QB search. They also knew that the upcoming QB class was strong, so the extra first round pick would likely be useful. Third, McD knew he was going to tear down the team, but they had enough confidence in Whaley to let him pick at 29 and after that. Fourth, they began the tear down in 2017, but they also wanted to get a look at some guys through that season before they decided on everyone. That's why after 2017, they said fans shouldn't expect 2018 to be as good as the playoff season - because they knew that they weren't done cleaning house. So the rebuild began a bit in 2017, but it didn't begin in earnest until 2018, when Beane got to run his own draft. I don't have any trouble seeing McD having the beginnings of that plan in place before the 2017 draft, and the full fledged plan in place went into place shortly after Beane arrived. As I said, they don't do anything without a reason.

I think he has seriously good ability to go get the ball. His hands catches, albeit in a highlight real, are excellent if not outstanding. There's been a lot discussion about Zay Jones. Duke looks like a serious threat to take Jones's job, because he looks so sure-handed. This guy goes and gets the ball in a crowd, he doesn't seem to get outfought for the ball, he doesn't bobble it.

Great article. When i listen to McD it sounds like they're building to avoid this kind of thing. Article should be required readi.g for McBeane and Allen. Belichick and Brady got this right, and that's why they have the rings and McCarthy and Rodgers don't. If haven't read it, it's worth it.