JaCrispy

This seems like a legit argument...Do you know if the Trump campaign has attempted to counter this point?

You are right- I probably should have combined, at least, a few of those threads...my bad...mods feel free... But the things I put on here are things I that I see and want to get other people’s opinions on... I want to hear other perspectives in case I’ve missed something... Potential election fraud and covid are the two biggest issues going on right now...so it only makes sense that people are talking about them in PPP... And if new videos or info comes out, I’ll try to keep it to one thread...👍

You may be right...but if it as you say, an innocent act, why the coy behavior, looking around to see if anyone is watching? Why not just hand it to the young man? Why pretend to stretch while she slips it into his pocket... Just playing devils advocate here, but you have to admit, the behavior does lend itself to question...

Ya know, Tiberius, that’s a great question...I’m really not sure...Id like to think there isn’t...but seeing things like this doesn’t help... And other countries have fraudulent elections, so I can’t put passed the realm of possibility...and with more and more technology being used, it would seem to make it easier to rig an election if people wanted to... It is said that every election has “some” fraud...the question then becomes, is it systemic? In school we learned about the fraud back in Chicago, during the 1960 elections between Nixon and Kennedy... But if there is fraud I don’t think it would be a Democrat or Republican thing...I think both parties are capable and complicit...I guess it just becomes a thing where “do the people decide for the parties”? Or “do the parties decide for the people”?

Video shows election night poll workers in Georgia taking (what looks to be) USB card from the computer and, surreptitiously, passing it along to another worker... On the surface, it appears like they are trying not to be detected... I was just wondering why this might be a big deal- what are the potential hazards that might make this a fraudulent situation?

If there was a transfer of the USB card, like the video creator suggests, how would that necessarily mean there was fraud?

I was so pissed off when the Bills drafted Allen...But I am so happy he was able to change my mind on picking him...This kid appears to be able to do whatever he puts his mind to...

The Bills roll nobody...they aren’t built or coached to blow teams out...not to mention the Bills are without Smoke and rarely play well in prime time...I’m not optimistic about this game...

Well, this is starting to get a little hyperbolic, and off track...but I will respond, going back to the OP.... I have no problem with the government advising certain safety precautions with regards to going to church...ultimately, however, I think it should be up to the individual to decide for themselves, whether they want to go or not... No one is forcing them to go, and no one should be allowed to be kept from going, if they so choose...And on top of that, no one is forcing those, afraid of the virus, to go out either... Now, if certain pastors or faiths choose not to open their houses of worship, that is their choice and ok too...I have a brother-in-law who is a pastor of a church...their doors have been closed since April, and that’s fine...But I also know of other pastors who have opened their churches...and I think that should be their prerogative, too... And, just for the record, I do not go to church, myself...I haven’t in 20 years...But, still, I see government restrictions on places of worship as unconstitutional...

Yes it is...but the world has seen far worse, and we will get through it now like others did in years passed...

No John Brown?

makes sense...

Nice post...much of what you say is kind of where I’m coming from...and your concerns are certainly legitimate imo... Good stuff...informative 👍

Great question...That portion of the quote is to protect against the government promoting or advocating for a particular religion... However, no single religion is being protected or advanced...the freedom to exercise religion pertains to ALL faiths...

First off, let’s just be honest with each other, and not try to pretend like we know how religious each member of the Supreme Court is... Second, I disagree with your notion that religion, itself, has to be anti science...Can some religious people be anti science? Sure...But there are also people, like myself, who believe in both... Third, if you read the quote from the constitution I previously posted, it clearly states, without ambiguity, what the law is- and a majority of the justices have correctly interpreted it, imo... Now, you may not agree with what the constitution clearly states...you might want the State to have ultimate power and control over those decisions...that is your right to have that opinion...but our country was not set up that way...And it has nothing to do with what the justices think about science or the virus, imo, and everything to do with what they think about the constitution and our God given human rights...👍

The Court May have some religious people on it, but I don’t think you have to be religious to come to the conclusion that the court did... “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”. It doesn’t say “unless there is a public health crisis” or “unless we are at war”. The rights in the constitution are considered God given human rights that no government can, simply, put a pause on whenever they feel like it...that’s the beauty of it. And people can choose whether they want to attend or not...

https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/03/politics/california-harvest-rock-newsom-supreme-court/index.html I think things like this are what make us the greatest nation in the world- our constitution, which protects individual God given rights over government infringement...just beautiful...power to the people!

Any threats against any whistle blowers, regardless of political affiliation, are not good...

Nice...she’s hot! 😍

The White isn’t bad on occasion...but I like the gray...it’s a classic old school look...

That should be an INT....defender had their hands on the ball 😉

A politician running on cutting taxes is not considered offering an illegal bribe...to think so is taking a major leap... So here’s how it works...when you start a business or agree to provide services for wages, everything you gross is your money...whatever you net is your money minus what the government has taken from you...therefore, a tax cut is essentially the government taking less of your money... There is no debt, specifically from tax cuts, because the funds are always there...There is only debt when the government chooses to spend money they do not have...and it is important to remember, government has no money unless they take it from you.

I would say it’s different...Funds for debt relief have to be taken from someone else...whereas taxes are taken from you... So, if you are bribed with a tax cut, you are only getting back what is legally yours, anyway...On the flip side, when someone enters into a financial agreement (student loans) and is bribed with debt relief, those funds used to pay for said debt relief does not belong to you... So, in that regard, I would say there is a difference...

I’m concerned with the RB position, but I agree with your overall philosophy for the upcoming draft...👍