Bray Wyatt

Cant every team use a goalie like that though?

6-1 now why am I still watching

Its not the goal tenders fault when we just make blind passes to the other team in our own zone

never listened to them before, never want to listen to them again lol

im streaming the game at work and have to listen to the damn devils announcers, ugh

these last two games are just awful, where was the team that played Montreal?

they do this every year it seems, every time we score, we let down, no excuse on that shorthand

While I agree with this, TT has showed that the cant be relied on consistently. We were +3 in turnover differential going into that last drive, not to mention a good punt return with a penalty tacked on to the end of it to give us good field position, and we still only put up 16 pts. Yes TT has not changed, but this tells me/reaffirms two things. 1. We need to draft a QB high next year. 2. Either we roll with status quo and try and eke into the playoffs, or go with the unknown quantity which has boom or bust potential. Good post, but to add on to another reason why they wont make the change now, is I think McD would lose the locker room if he made a change now.

I think it is a combo of things. Since the offense is based on the outside zone read and the right side of our line being bad it limits what we can do in the run game. If the D thinks we are running the ball, call a run blitz to the left side of our line. That way if we run left we get stopped for a loss, if we run right its going to suck because we cant block it.

if all healthy, I said glenn incognito wood groy dawkins

yeah I now don't like mrs Thompson and wish her baby boy was back

Did you not read the quote? He said he was more concerned with his performance than the team winning. That seems contradictory to what you are saying.

There is already another thread on the Andy Benoit article, this should be moved there

Your sarcasm meter must be broken

it is amazing how outraged people get, and where this thread has turned. On a sexism scale, I would have to think this has got to be on the low side

Let him get up to speed in practice this week but sit him out, then during the bye he can be inserted into starter role, and we can get two weeks to get Dawkins acclimated to the RT spot

True but they don't seem to be moving on from him yet, and its hard to win a shootout if you can't put one in the net (for some reason Chris Farley in Black Sheep came to mind when he is yelling at David Spade when they are playing checkers, "Its so easy to win when you never move your back row!")

What is up with the Sabres futility on shoot outs? I am no hockey expert, (I mean I understand the rules and what I am watching just wasn't raised in a hockey family so have had to learn as I go) and I try to catch as many games as I can, but couldn't we stash someone on the roster, like a 4th line type guy who just specializes in shootouts? It seems we need to get someone like Kotalik who was money

Personally I don't think he was trying to be sexist I think he is just an idiot

Rodak even when he gives credit to the bills praises the Pats. Like one of his recent ones, where he described what the bills were doing in the FO as the Pats formula

If we were stuck in a cave for 17 years, you should jump at any light you have as there is nothing to lose, whats the worst that can happen? you stay stuck in the cave? on the other hand, if the light is real....

I see Cincy as #3 scoring D and tampa as #16 Also, our offense is based on running the ball and we have faced 3 of the top 12 teams against the run (Denver, Carolina and Atl) \\ Cincy is lower on the run D side at #17 whereas tampa is #5

a couple issues here, while our offense hasn't scored lots of points, we have played some really great defenses which he didn't acknowledge. He also states we have these offensive powerhouses coming up but down plays what we did to Atlanta. It seems to me he is looking for things to prove that we wont succeed imo. It doesn't mean the points he makes aren't valid, just seems to me it was written as a piece to back up what he already thought instead of using data to reach a conclusion on its own

I wonder why the safeties?