teef

weird. ok. guess some of us think our opinions are a bit more important than others...

you're certainly right. i guess the biggest question was how much better they felt wolford was than an injured off. i honestly have zero idea who wolford is as a qb, so it just seemed odd to me. there aren't very many teams that wouldn't force their, "franchise" starter in the game, broken finger or not. i'd guess they'd do that with allen, mahomes, etc as others have mentioned. either the rams thought very highly of wolford, or they didnt' think much of goff at all. after the trade, that seems to make a bit more sense.

i don't know why some see this as shocking. it all certainly makes a bit more sense now.

he's going to start crapping thunder, and lightning is going to shoot out of his mouth.

i don't care about the cards. i'm far more interested in why you moved. go on.

bummer.

good for him. you take the money when you can in this game.

no kidding! that's a nice tidbit, (i never use the word tidbit, but it seemed fitting here).

agreed, and i couldn't even think of the guy's name either.

then why not play an injured goff?

then why dress? i get that it's for an emergency situation, but apparently he was boarder line to dress. if it was the same situation with the bills, do you think they'd let barkley play? i'd assume they'd still go with josh, even with a broken thumb, unless they absolutely couldn't.

this came up on nfl radio. brady quinn mentioned that typically if the starter was hurt enough to not start, why even dress him? if the starter can play in any capacity, he should...especially in a playoff game.

i'm not somone who hates brady, but i'm not going to cheer for the guy to get another super bowl. ***** him and ***** the horse he rode in on.

are you happy to be back in upset mode?

i'm assuming this is what fans want when they mention working on the run game. just to know that a possible run play can have some success would be an improvement.

not a single mention of scurvy.

i think now the biggest question becomes....do we buy many of the $1/$2 tickets, or do we spring for the $5 or more tickets?

scratch off lotto tickets.

i'm not sure we have few enough holes to get that one missing piece. i think 2 or 3 very good FA signings,(not mega deals) could help in the right positions. at the end of the day, it's not a terrible problem to have that this team won 13 games and still has holes to fill. the bills can get better.

i think it's going to be a more interesting offseason than we may have realized.

completely agree. this team is good, but not good enough yet.

stop it, (saying stop it is my new thing). edit: josh's nerves didn't lose the game. the entire team team was high strung, a bit off, and just out matched. this wasn't strictly a josh problem. let's now make the nerve thing a new, major issue. as experience comes, confidence comes. he can handle the pressure, but for some reason people want to make this into a concern. for me now, it's not.

you beat me to it!!!

if this is the case, many need to quickly grow some testicles.

you're really that offened by the phrase, "stop it". jesus people are sensitive after a loss. the op is a guy who creates a million threads. in this thread, he just criticizes the fact that the wrs are beat up, and the staff should have done something. ok...like what? what can be done this late in a season to repair a dinged up group? i have no problem with him making the comment, but if you're going to be critical, offer a solution. notice how the op was asked to do so and didn't? why? he couldn't. there's no easy answer.